Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Francesca Sammarruca University of Idaho

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Francesca Sammarruca University of Idaho"— Presentation transcript:

1 Francesca Sammarruca University of Idaho
How well does the chiral expansion converge in nuclear and neutron matter? Francesca Sammarruca University of Idaho 8th International Workshop on Chiral Dynamics June 29 - July 3, 2015 Pisa, Italy Research supported in part by the US Department of Energy.

2 Collaborators: L. Coraggio (INFN, Naples) J.W. Holt (University of Washington) N. Itaco (INFN and University of Naples) R. Machleidt (University of Idaho) L.E. Marcucci (INFN, Pisa)

3 Nuclear/neutron matter as a testing ground for many-body theories.
OUTLINE: Nuclear/neutron matter as a testing ground for many-body theories. Different approaches to predicting nuclear/neutron matter properties: advantages/disadvantages. Chiral EFT and error quantification. Chiral forces: Overview. Order-by-order nuclear/neutron matter calculations. Conclusions, outlook.

4 After more than 8 decades of nuclear physics,
still a lot is unknown about the nuclear chart. Particularly true for systems with large isospin asymmetry

5 Experimental programs at RIBF
(and the upcoming FRIB) will have widespread impact, filling some of the gaps in our incomplete knowledge of the nuclear chart. Isospin-Asymmetric Nuclear Matter (IANM) is closely related to neutron-rich nuclei and is a convenient theoretical laboratory. Studies of IANM (particularly the symmetry energy contribution to the EoS), are now particularly timely, as they support rich on-going and future experimental effort. The EoS of highly neutron-rich matter is crucial to understand wide-ranging questions in nuclear structure.

6 The goal of microscopic nuclear physics:
To derive the properties of nuclear systems from the basic nuclear interactions (AB INITIO)

7 Meson-theoretic interactions have been used extensively
in nuclear matter calculations (and still are). Problem: The 3NFs employed in these calculations have only a lose connection to the associated 2NFs. How to select the contributions to be retained?

8 (virtual nucleon-antinucleon excitation)
Relativistic approaches have focused on the Dirac-Brueckner-Hartree-Fock (DBHF) framework together with relativistic OBEPs, and are suitable to address a broad range of momenta/densities. DBHF: An efficient way to include a particular class of 3NF. (virtual nucleon-antinucleon excitation)

9 Problem shared by all non-EFT-based approaches:
It is essentially impossible to estimate reliably the actual uncertainty associated with a particular prediction. The philosophy of EFT and power counting: When correctly implemented, EFT provides a well-defined path to calculate observables whose truncation error should decrease systematically as higher orders are included.

10 EFT: A framework in which the properties governed by
low-energy physics are specified by the choice of degrees of freedom and symmetries, and can be computed systematically. Short-range physics is included through the processes of regularization and renormalization Power counting: an organizational scheme to rank-order the various diagrams. Nuclear two- and few-body forces emerge on equal footing in a controlled hierarchy.

11

12 Sources of uncertainty:
QUANTIFICATION OF THE UNCERTAINTY IN NUCLEONIC MATTER Sources of uncertainty: 1) Many-body method (not inherent to EFT) 2) ERRORS IN THE LECs AND THEIR PROPAGATION IN THE HAMILTONIAN: Short-range (NN) LECs Long-range (pi-N) LECs 3) Regulator dependence 4) Truncation error

13 Nuclear matter has been approached with
a broad spectrum of many-body methods: Coupled-cluster Many-body perturbation Monte Carlo: Variational MC Green’s function MC

14 Uncertainty from the many-body method:
We adopt infinite summation of particle-particle (pp) ladder diagrams. From recent coupled-cluster calculations extended beyond pp and hh ladders [Hagen et al., PRC89, (2014)], we conclude: Negligible effect in neutron matter About +/-1 MeV in symmetric nuclear matter We determine that the pp ladder approximation provides sufficient accuracy for our purposes.

15 Findings from the Granada group (arXiv:1407.7784 (2014)):
Applied 205 MC samples of smooth local potentials (all with chi-squared/datum of about 1) and found an uncertainty of +/- 15 keV for the triton B.E. Uncertainty from the NN LECs: In a standard BHF calculation of nuclear matter with local high-precision potentials from the Nijmegen group, we find an uncertainty of +/- 0.6 MeV in the E/A at normal density. (Consistent with a similar study of the Granada group using Skyrme forces.) Thus: For the NN LECs, we believe that the uncertainty arising from errors in the NN data has only negligible impact in the many-body system.

16 Uncertainty in Pi-N LECs:
They impact mostly high partial waves (those where no contacts are available). At NLO: D waves and higher At N3LO: F waves and higher Therefore, we expect this to cause only small uncertainty in nuclear matter. However, a systematic investigation with consideration of pi-N LECs uncertainty in both 2NF and (consistent) 3NF has not yet been done.

17 17

18 REGULARIZATION and CUTOFF DEPENDENCE:
Chiral NN potentials are multiplied by a regulator function: which sets the “UV scale”. Potentials with different cutoffs constitute a family with the same long-range properties. Cutoff dependence is expected to decrease with increasing order.

19 NLO Cutoff = MeV

20 NLO NLO NNLO Cutoff = 450-800 MeV R. Machleidt R. Machleidt
Chiral NFs NTSE2014, June 23-27, 2014 Chiral NFs NTSE2014, June 23-27, 2014 20 20

21 NLO NLO NLO NNLO NNLO N3LO Cutoff = 450-800 MeV Cutoff = 450-600 MeV
R. Machleidt R. Machleidt R. Machleidt Chiral NFs NTSE2014, June 23-27, 2014 Chiral NFs NTSE2014, June 23-27, 2014 Chiral NFs NTSE2014, June 23-27, 2014 21 21 21

22 At the 2N level: Excellent order-by-order improvement. From NLO to N2LO: No new contacts are generated. At N2LO, subleading 2PE contributions allow for a better description of the intermediate-range attraction (they encode the important physics of correlated 2PE). Only at N3LO high-precision quality description of the NN data becomes possible (additional contacts).

23 Moving on to nuclear matter:
We proceed with the particle-particle ladder approximation (see above), with NN forces as described above, and 3NF…..

24 3NFs make their first appearance at N2LO:
The 3NF LECs are fitted to the binding energies of 3H and 3He and the Gamow-Teller matrix element for triton beta-decay. (Marcucci et al.).

25 Predictions at NLO (yellow), N2LO (red), N3LO (blue),
varying in each case the cutoff in the regulator function applied to the chiral NN potential between 450 and 600 MeV.

26 Observations from the nuclear matter (SNM) calculations:
Large spread at NLO and N2LO; Bands do not overlap. Thus, their width is not a suitable representation of the uncertainty in the respective orders. Cutoff dependence is reduced in our N3LO calculation. But, still large uncertainty. Missing contributions (3NF at N3LO) could be a source of uncertainty. Better convergence pattern with the lower ( MeV) cutoffs.

27 Same study, for neutron matter..
Yellow: NLO Red: N2LO Blue: N3LO

28 For neutron matter (NM):
Generally weaker cutoff dependence than in SNM. Similar observations apply as in SNM with regard to the bands not overlapping. Results are not well converged. Overall: Although cutoff sensitivity decreases with increasing order, cutoff variations generally underestimate the uncertainty.

29 …and, similar study for the symmetry energy
Yellow: NLO Red: N2LO Blue: N3LO

30 Summary and Conclusions:
Order-by-order convergence studies with chiral forces are very important. Our goal is to lay the foundation for such calculations of nuclear many-body systems. At this time, we conclude: At low orders in the chiral expansion, no indication of good convergence. Our N3LO calculations indicate a pattern of slow convergence for the lower values of the cutoff.

31 Program to make the analysis broader and more systematic:
OUTLOOK Program to make the analysis broader and more systematic: Vary the pi-N LECs. For each set of ci, construct NN potentials and use them consistently in the 2NF and the 3NF. For each set, refit the cD and cE LECs to the A=3 system. Start series of calculations at N4LO! N4LO is very promising. See Few-Body talks this afternoon…


Download ppt "Francesca Sammarruca University of Idaho"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google