Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLee Miller Modified over 6 years ago
1
Hierarchical Clustering and Network Topology Identification
Rui Castro Mark Coates Rob Nowak Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Copyright © Rui Castro
2
Topology Identification
Ratnasamy & McCanne (1999) Duffield, et al (2000,01,02) Bestravos, et al (2001) Coates, et al (2001) Shih & Hero (2002) Pairwise delay measurements reveal topology Copyright © Rui Castro
3
Topology Identification
Challenges: 12 % never respond,15 % multiple interfaces - Barford et al (2000) detect level-2 topology “invisible” to IP layer (e.g., switches) Copyright © Rui Castro
4
Relationship between Topology ID and Hierarchical Clustering
Copyright © Rui Castro
5
Do not need clock synchronization!!
Sandwich Probing Do not need clock synchronization!! Copyright © Rui Castro
6
Sandwich Probing we can infer that receivers 3 & 4 have a longer shared path than 3 & 5 Topology imposes constraints more shared queues larger Copyright © Rui Castro
7
Delay Covariance more shared queues larger covariance
Copyright © Rui Castro
8
Measurement Framework
Key Assumptions: stationarity fixed (but unknown) routes temporal independence spatial independence Multiple measurements individual measurement CLT Copyright © Rui Castro
9
Maximum Likelihood Tree - MLT
The maximum likelihood tree (MLT) is defined as where product of Gaussian densities Two Approaches: Binary tree construction based on bottom-up, recursive selection and pair-merging process Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) tree search measurements unknown similarity metric values, measurement likelihood forest of possible trees, monotonicity constrain set, for tree Copyright © Rui Castro
10
Internet Experiments – Sandwich Probing
Traceroute topology MCMC topology UNO ALT topology Copyright © Rui Castro
11
Internet Experiments – RTT Delay Covariance
Traceroute topology Estimated topology Thanks to Yolanda Tsang & Mehmet Yildiz Copyright © Rui Castro
12
Final Remarks and Comments
Clever probing and sampling schemes reveal “hidden” network structure and behavior Likelihood based methods are a natural choice to account for uncertainty in the data Sampling methods relying solely on RTT can be devised R. Castro, M. Coates and R. Nowak, "Likelihood Based Hierarchical Clustering", IEEE Transactions in Signal Processing, August R. Castro, M. Coates, G. Liang, R. Nowak and B. Yu, "Network Tomography: Recent Developments", Statistical Science, 2004 (invited paper, to appear). Complex interplay between measurement/probing techniques, statistical modeling, and computational methods for optimization Copyright © Rui Castro
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.