1. Benefits expected from data providers
Marek Ostanek, Director Department of Data Management, UKE

2. Status o mapping in Poland
Infrastructure mapping _done
Theoretical max speed of Internet_download
Service mapping _done
Demand mapping _done
Investment _done
Quality service _ under develepment

3. Infrastructure mapping in relation to TUV requirements

4. Fixed NUTS3
EU Grid
Grid 250*250

5. % of buildings with fixed speed
Initiative
NUTS / GRID ID
QoS Type
Technology Internet Access Provider
Time
Technology Customer End User
Operator
Additional indicator
Quality criteria
Result of combinations
Name of Initiative ID 1
Group: All/Unknown
All time / Unknown
All/Unknown
Availability Households
Infrastructure
Min
spatial resolution 2
Group: Wired
Working Days
LAN
Operator (physical) XXX
Availability Inhabitants
Speed Down
Max 3
Group: Wireless
Weekends
WLAN …
Availability Area
Speed Up
Average
Group: Mobile
Day Peak
Mobile
Operator (physical) ZZZ
Availability Addresses
Latency
Median
Group: NGA
Day Non peak
Operator (virtual) XXX
Availability Roads
Jitter
Group 1
Single: DSL/ADSL
Take-up
Packet loss
Group 2
Single: CATV
Operator (virtual) ZZZ
Measurement Only
Data Usage
Group 3
Single: FTTC/VDSL
Measurement Comparison
Group 4
Single: FTTH/B
Group 5
Single: UMTS/3G
Number of measurements
Single: LTE/4G
Number of Operators (physical)
Single: 2G
Number of Operators (virtual)
Single: WiMAX/WLAN
Names of Operators (physical)
Single: Satellite
Names of Operators (virtual)
Theoretical
Grid 1km- Many buildings with different speed _DSl , the same problem exists in mobile
% of buildings with fixed speed
Yes
Yes No No
Yes
Yes
Yes/No
Yes
Measurements
Grid 1km- Many buildings with different measurements speed _DSl , the same problem exists in mobile - many measuremets. What we should present on the map?
Only part of grid has network or mobile coverage?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

6. Theoretical VDSL Supplier 1 FTTH Supplier 2 Mobile Supp. 3 Max 2Mb/s
For this grid:
Supp.1, 3 b, max 10Mb/s
Supp.1, 2 b, max 2Mb/s
Supp.2, 5 b, more than100Mb/s
Sold 2Mb/s
Max 10Mb/s
Max 30Mb/s
Sold 100Mb/s

7. Service mapping

8. Check your address
Enter the address
Proprietary name

9. Quality mapping
Under development

10. Data sources for the purposes of QoS/QoE mapping
NPK - Measurement Tool under the project on
Information System on Broadband Infrastructure and
the Broadband Poland portal

11. Data sources for the purposes of QoS/QoE mapping
BEREC Model of QoS evaluation of the ISP in the provision of internet access services (IAS)
Applications for the auditors/testers
Measurement probes

12. Internet Access Provider Network Internet eXchange Point
Data sources for the purposes of QoS/QoE mapping
Model of Client Application Measurement in NPK
Internet Network
Main Test Server
Analytic Reporting System
Test Results
Data Base
Testing Data
Reference Test Server
Test Application
Test Server
Test Application
Measuremet
Measuremet
Internet Network
Internet Access Provider Network
Test Application and
End User Equipment
Access Network
IP Edge Router
Internet eXchange Point
Termination Network Point
Testing Stream

13. MEF 23.1

14. Theoretical VDSL Supplier 1 FTTH Supplier 2 Mobile Supp. 3 Max 2Mb/s
For this grid:
Supp.1, 3 b, max 10Mb/s
Supp.1, 2 b, max 2Mb/s
Supp.2, 5 b, more than100Mb/s
Sold 2Mb/s
Max 10Mb/s
Max 30Mb/s
Sold 100Mb/s

15. Benefits expected from data providers Polish perspective
We are changing the low and we are going to:
abolish the possibility to block the information secret entrepreneurs on building level,
the name of the service provider is no longer a secret,
offered rate and the technology also.
Comparing the theoretical internet speed or sold service with measurement for fixed address we give the negotiation power to customer.
Collecting measurements data from Internet users we will be able to recognize area where quality of service is worse. That way Polish NRA based on professional measurement done by certificated tolls can press supplier to improve quality.
Benefit for potential infrastructure investor is that they can find the niche where quality is bad and no one is going to improve this. Then they can start to thing about new business.

16. Questions? What do you expect from this mapping application?
Readable and understandable format of input data       
Which of features could provide a value-added for you (first ideas)? 
Trends and predictions     
Who should get access to the expert version of the platform? 
NRA experts, Government experts, Analytics, 
Where do you see the main challenge of this project?
Data capture from many sources. Obligation for data suppliers( NRA’s) ?
Final visualization of collected data,
Aggregation algorithms
Different kind of data like data from Sam Knows tools or separates measurements of users.
Correlation of official measurements like drive test for mobile with singles users measurements. What should be sent do EU portal?

17. Thank you for your attention
Marek Ostanek
Office of Electronic Communications
Thank you for your attention. I hope you find this presentation interesting.
If you have any questions, I would be glad to answer them.