Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Acknowledgements to all FCC study teams

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Acknowledgements to all FCC study teams"— Presentation transcript:

1 Acknowledgements to all FCC study teams
SMB FCC Civil Engineering FCC Week Rome, 2016 C. Cook, J. Osborne Acknowledgements to all FCC study teams C. Cook

2 FCC Civil Engineering Outline
History of the FCC civil engineering study FCC underground civil structures Naming Convention Cross-sections - Single and double tunnel proposals - Transfer lines - Combining FCC-hh and FCC-ee requirements Construction methods, rates and risks Inclined access tunnels Study of options for position of FCC Intersecting vs. Non-intersecting MDI and civil engineering - Experimental area layout FCC-he civil engineering Main challenges and future steps (costing) John: Chronological description of study since Washington. Advertise other CE talks. MCA, TOT development, AMBERG studies, ILC C. Cook

3 Recent history of the FCC civil engineering study
C. Cook

4 FCC Civil Engineering Naming Convention TO BE UPDATED C. Cook

5 FCC underground structures – double tunnel proposal
FCC Civil Engineering FCC underground structures – double tunnel proposal TO BE UPDATED C. Cook

6 ZAC map (ok to show?) & FHI design
FCC Civil Engineering LHC to FCC transfer lines ZAC map (ok to show?) & FHI design C. Cook

7 Combining FCC-hh and FCC-ee
FCC Civil Engineering Combining FCC-hh and FCC-ee Infrastructure must be designed to house both machines, at different times Boundary conditions for FCC-hh and FCC-ee beam separation in a given tunnel Max. separation FCC-ee beams Min. & max. separation FCC-ee & FCC-hh beams Change background O. Katsunobu C. Cook

8 Combining FCC-hh and FCC-ee
FCC Civil Engineering Combining FCC-hh and FCC-ee Widening of tunnel around FCC-ee IPs necessary ~1km either side of two IPs = ~4km total widened tunnel Tapered from ~16m at experimental halls to 6m over 1km C. Cook

9 FCC construction – Methods, progress rates and risks
FCC Civil Engineering FCC construction – Methods, progress rates and risks C. Cook

10 Inclined access tunnels
FCC Civil Engineering Inclined access tunnels C. Cook

11 Plan view drawing - Alexis
FCC Civil Engineering Machine Detector Interface Thanks to MDI-hh, MDI-ee, HSE Plan view drawing - Alexis C. Cook

12 ‘Intersecting’ vs. ‘Non-intersecting’ position of the FCC
FCC Civil Engineering ‘Intersecting’ vs. ‘Non-intersecting’ position of the FCC 100km ‘Intersecting’ option TO BE UPDATED Limestone region: Jura Max overburden: 650m Deepest shaft: 392m % of tunnel in limestone: 13.5% Total shaft depths: 3211m Challenges: 7.8km tunnelling through Jura limestone 300m-400m deep shafts and caverns in molasse C. Cook

13 ‘Intersecting’ vs. ‘Non-intersecting’ position of the FCC
FCC Civil Engineering ‘Intersecting’ vs. ‘Non-intersecting’ position of the FCC 100km ‘Non-Intersecting’ option TO BE UPDATED Limestone region: Prealps Max overburden: 1350m Deepest shaft: 383m % of tunnel in limestone: 4.4% Total shaft depths: 3095m Challenges: 11.6km tunnelling through Prealps geology 1.35km maximum tunnel overburden 300m-400m deep shafts and caverns in molasse C. Cook

14 ‘Intersecting’ vs. ‘Non-intersecting’ position of the FCC
FCC Civil Engineering ‘Intersecting’ vs. ‘Non-intersecting’ position of the FCC C. Cook

15 ‘Intersecting’ vs. ‘Non-intersecting’ position of the FCC
FCC Civil Engineering ‘Intersecting’ vs. ‘Non-intersecting’ position of the FCC 93km option C. Cook

16 FCC Civil Engineering Amberg Study C. Cook

17 FCC Civil Engineering FCC-he LHeC / FCC-he Independent FCC-he
Point L, F, H or B LHeC / FCC-he LHC P8 & FCC PB LHeC C. Cook

18 Main challenges and future steps
FCC Civil Engineering Main challenges and future steps C. Cook

19


Download ppt "Acknowledgements to all FCC study teams"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google