Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
CHAPTER 6 Audit Evidence
2
An auditor must address four decisions regarding evidence accumulation:
3
Which audit procedures should be used?
An auditor must address four decisions regarding evidence accumulation: Which audit procedures should be used?
4
Which audit procedures should be used?
What are audit procedures?
5
Which audit procedures should be used?
An audit procedure is a detailed instruction for the collection of a type of audit evidence.
6
Which audit procedures should be used?
In general, the auditor will seek the most appropriate procedures that are also cost-feasible.
7
What sample size should be selected?
An auditor must address four decisions regarding evidence accumulation: MORE LESS What sample size should be selected?
8
Which items should be selected for testing?
An auditor must address four decisions regarding evidence accumulation: Which items should be selected for testing?
9
Which items should be selected for testing?
The auditor will consider: - random/judgmental selection
10
Which items should be selected for testing?
The auditor will consider: - random/judgmental selection - materiality
11
Which items should be selected for testing?
The auditor will consider: - random/judgmental selection - materiality - results of prior audits
12
When should the procedures be performed?
An auditor must address four decisions regarding evidence accumulation: When should the procedures be performed? December ?
13
When should the procedures be performed?
December The auditor will consider procedures that should be performed before, on, or after the balance sheet date.
14
When should the procedures be performed?
An auditor must address four decisions regarding evidence accumulation: Which audit procedures should be used? What sample size should be selected? Which items should be selected for testing? When should the procedures be performed?
15
When should the procedures be performed?
Which audit procedures should be used? What sample size should be selected? Which items should be selected for testing? When should the procedures be performed? After these questions have been answered and the specific audit objectives have been identified, an audit program is constructed.
16
What is an audit program?
After these questions have been answered and the specific audit objectives have been identified, an audit program is constructed. What is an audit program?
17
An audit program is a list of
After these questions have been answered and the specific audit objectives have been identified, an audit program is constructed. An audit program is a list of detailed audit procedures for each component or cycle specifying proce-dure timing, sample sizes, and selection methods.
18
Persuasiveness of evidence is determined by:
relevance timeliness sufficiency appropriate- ness
19
Persuasiveness of evidence is determined by:
relevance timeliness sufficiency appropriate- ness Which of these are specifically mentioned in the 3rd examination standard?
20
sufficiency Which of these are specifically mentioned in the 3rd examination standard? appropriate- ness
21
Evidence must pertain to the specific audit objective.
relevance Evidence must pertain to the specific audit objective.
22
Evidence must pertain to the specific audit objective.
relevance Example: An auditor is concerned about the completeness of accounts payable (a/p). Why would confirmation of a/p bal- ances be an irrelevant procedure?
23
Example: An auditor is concerned about
relevance Example: An auditor is concerned about the completeness of accounts payable (a/p). Why would confirmation of a/p bal- ances be an irrelevant procedure? Confirmation addresses existence. For completeness, a search is needed.
24
Appropriateness concerns the believability and trustworthi-
ness of the evidence.
25
Appropriateness concerns the believability and trustworthiness
of the evidence. Appropriateness is determined by: - independence of the evidence provider
26
Appropriateness concerns the believability and trustworthiness
of the evidence. Appropriateness is determined by: - independence of the evidence provider - effectiveness of client’s internal controls
27
Appropriateness concerns the believability and trustworthiness
of the evidence. Appropriateness is determined by: - independence of the evidence provider - effectiveness of client’s internal controls - auditor’s direct knowledge
28
Appropriateness concerns the believability and trustworthiness
of the evidence. Appropriateness is determined by: - independence of the evidence provider - effectiveness of client’s internal controls - auditor’s direct knowledge - qualifications of information provider
29
Appropriateness concerns the believability and trustworthiness
of the evidence. Appropriateness is determined by: - independence of the evidence provider - effectiveness of client’s internal controls - auditor’s direct knowledge - qualifications of information provider - degree of objectivity
30
Appropriateness concerns the believability and trustworthiness
of the evidence. appropriate- ness Appropriateness is a measure of evidence quality, it cannot be enhanced by a larger sample size.
31
sufficiency Sufficiency is a measure of quantity. In general, the larger the sample size, the more persuasive the evidence.
32
Auditors must balance the trade-off be-
More evidence yields more assurance and higher audit costs. MORE LESS Less evidence yields less assurance and lower audit costs. Auditors must balance the trade-off be- tween gathering more or less evidence.
33
Sufficiency must be addressed for each audit test and each component
of the financial statements.
34
Sufficiency must be addressed for each audit test and each component
of the financial statements. An appropriate sample size may be determined by auditor judgment and/or by statistical sampling.
35
In determining a sufficient sample
sufficiency In determining a sufficient sample size, an auditor will also consider: - “representativeness”
36
In determining a sufficient sample
sufficiency In determining a sufficient sample size, an auditor will also consider: - “representativeness” - materiality, large dollar amounts
37
In determining a sufficient sample
sufficiency In determining a sufficient sample size, an auditor will also consider: - “representativeness” - materiality, large dollar amounts - items with high probability of misstatement
38
When should audit evidence be gathered?
timeliness When should audit evidence be gathered?
39
When should audit evidence be gathered?
timeliness When should audit evidence be gathered? - evidence related to balance sheet accounts should be collected as close to the balance sheet date as possible
40
When should audit evidence be gathered?
timeliness When should audit evidence be gathered? - evidence related to balance sheet accounts should be collected as close to the balance sheet date as possible - evidence related to income statement accounts should be collected from throughout the period rather than from only part of the period
41
Evidence is considered persuasive only if all four determinants have been met. relevance timeliness sufficiency appropriate- ness
42
With regard to the adequacy and costs of audit evidence:
absolute certainty convincing evidence requires
43
With regard to the adequacy and costs of audit evidence:
absolute certainty requires convincing evidence requires high audit costs
44
With regard to the adequacy and costs of audit evidence:
requires absolute certainty convincing evidence high audit costs requires reasonable certainty persuasive evidence
45
With regard to the adequacy and costs of audit evidence:
requires absolute certainty convincing evidence high audit costs reasonable certainty requires persuasive evidence requires reasonable audit costs
46
Types of evidence - physical examination - inspection or
count by the auditor of a tangible asset very appropriate evidence!
47
Types of evidence - physical examination
- confirmation - receipt of a written or oral response from an independent third party at the auditor’s request auditor Canada 46 client’s customer very appropriate evidence!
48
process must be controlled
Types of evidence - physical examination - confirmation - receipt of a written or oral response from an independent third party at the auditor’s request The confirmation process must be controlled by the auditor.
49
a sample of accounts receivable should be confirmed by the
Types of evidence - physical examination - confirmation - receipt of a written re- sponse from an independent third party at the auditor’s request Whenever reasonable, a sample of accounts receivable should be confirmed by the auditor.
50
Types of evidence - physical examination - confirmation
- documentation (vouching) - auditor examination of client documents and records
51
What is the difference between internal and external documents?
52
What is the difference between internal and external documents?
External documents are usually on the client’s premises but were either pre- pared by a third party or processed by a third party (more persuasive).
53
What is the difference between internal and external documents?
Internal documents have been prepared by the client and have not left the client’s premises (less persuasive).
54
What is the primary determinant of the appropriateness of internal documents?
55
What is the primary determinant of the appropriateness of internal documents?
control
56
Types of evidence What is the difference between physical
- physical examination - confirmation - documentation What is the difference between physical examination and documentation?
57
What is the difference between physical examination and documentation?
- physical examination - inspection or count by the auditor of a tangible asset - documentation (vouching) - auditor examination of client documents and records
58
Types of evidence - physical examination - confirmation
- documentation (vouching) - observation - using the senses to audit; often an informal procedure requiring follow-up procedures
59
Types of evidence - physical examination - confirmation
- documentation (vouching) - observation - inquiries of client - useful but biased and not persuasive unless supported by another form of evidence CPA
60
Types of evidence - physical examination - confirmation
- documentation (vouching) - observation - inquiries of client - reperformance - checking the accuracy of client calculations and transfers of information (often performed by an audit software package).
61
Types of evidence - physical examination - confirmation
- documentation (vouching) - observation - inquiries of client - reperformance - analytical procedures - involve analy- sis of comparisons and interrelation- ships in data (may be performed by an audit software package).
62
Analytical procedures should be used during the planning and completion phases of the audit...
63
Analytical procedures should be used during the planning and completion phases of the audit...
but they may also be beneficial at other times during the audit.
64
Purposes of Analytical Procedures
- facilitate understanding of client’s business and industry
65
Purposes of Analytical Procedures
- facilitate understanding of client’s business and industry - may indicate financial difficulty and the cli- ent’s ability to con- tinue as a going concern Bert’s Boutique Going Out of Business Sale!
66
Purposes of Analytical Procedures
- facilitate understanding of client’s business and industry - may indicate financial difficulty and the client’s ability to continue as a going concern - may indicate misstatements in the financial statements
67
Purposes of Analytical Procedures
- facilitate understanding of client’s business and industry - may indicate financial difficulty and the client’s ability to continue as a going concern - may indicate misstatements in the financial statements - may result in a reduction of detailed audit tests
68
Types of Analytical Procedures
- industry comparisons How do the client’s financial ratios compare with those of the industry?
69
Types of Analytical Procedures
- industry comparisons - comparisons with prior years Ace Company 2003 financial statements Ace Company 2004 financial statements
70
Types of Analytical Procedures
- industry comparisons - comparisons with prior years Ace Company 2003 financial statements Ace Company 2004 financial statements Conclusions from a 2-year analy- sis may be erroneous. WHY?
71
Types of Analytical Procedures
- industry comparisons - comparisons with prior years - comparisons with client-determined expected results, e.g., budgets
72
Types of Analytical Procedures
- industry comparisons - comparisons with prior years - comparisons with client-determined expected results - comparisons with auditor-determined expected results, examples: account can be calculated from sales commissions ?????????????????
73
Types of Analytical Procedures
- industry comparisons - comparisons with prior years - comparisons with client-determined expected results - comparisons with auditor-determined expected results, examples: account can be calculated from sales commissions sales depreciation expense ??????????????????
74
Types of Analytical Procedures
- industry comparisons - comparisons with prior years - comparisons with client-determined expected results - comparisons with auditor-determined expected results, examples: account can be calculated from sales commissions sales depreciation expense fixed assets interest expense ??????????????????
75
Types of Analytical Procedures
- industry comparisons - comparisons with prior years - comparisons with client-determined expected results - comparisons with auditor-determined expected results, examples: account can be calculated from sales commissions sales depreciation expense fixed assets interest expense notes/bonds payable
76
Types of Analytical Procedures
- industry comparisons - comparisons with prior years - comparisons with client-determined expected results - comparisons with auditor-determined - comparisons with expected results, using nonfinancial data, example: account can be calculated from equipment maintenance expense ???????
77
Types of Analytical Procedures
- industry comparisons - comparisons with prior years - comparisons with client-determined expected results - comparisons with auditor-determined - comparisons with expected results, using nonfinancial data, example: account can be calculated from equipment maintenance expense production
78
Analytical proce- dures are often facilitated by audit software.
79
If analytical procedures disclose unusual fluc-tuations or variances, the auditor should in-vestigate by gathering additional evidence.
80
If analytical procedures disclose unusual fluc-tuations or variances, the auditor should investigate
by gathering additional evidence. The auditor should con-sider whether fluctua- tions or variances are material and whether they may be reasonably justifiable.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.