Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Lessinger v. Commissioner

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Lessinger v. Commissioner"— Presentation transcript:

1 Lessinger v. Commissioner
872 F. 2d 619 (C.A.-2, 1989) Reversed: 85 T.C. 824 (1985) Yanina McMann Tax 8030

2 Background Sal Lessinger; sole proprietor of “Universal Screw and Bolt Co.” Incorporated under New York law by his attorney Entity had negative net worth at the transfer (liabilities > assets) “Loan receiveable- SL” entry on books for $255,499

3 Q1 & Analysis 1 Q1: When assets are transferred but no new stock is issued, does the transfer still qualify as Sec. 351? Yes. If it’s a sole shareholder and the transfer is into a wholly-owned operation.

4 Q2 and Analysis 2 Was the created debt real and countable toward the non-recognition when there is negative net worth (Sec 357(c))? Commissioner: no due date, interest rate Taxpayer: later signed a prom. note; Midland Marine used is as collateral; Yes, the debt is real

5 Q3 and Analysis 3 What is the adjusted basis of the transferred property to the corporation? No gain recognized under Sec. 351 unless falls under Sec. 357(c) Normally, basis = asset In this case: basis to corp. is face amount in hands of taxpayer


Download ppt "Lessinger v. Commissioner"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google