Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKristopher Bradley Modified over 6 years ago
1
the following information is not an official position
Unclassified my opinions are not an official position of the U.S. Navy
2
Conventional Wisdom? a better way for the Navy to
refuel ships overseas Matthew Philipp
3
Terminology Bunker as a noun: a shipboard compartment for fuel
Harbor or bay Bunker as a noun: a shipboard compartment for fuel Bunker as a verb: to provide a ship with fuel Navy vessel FUEL Oil tanker boom boom
4
The problem Does the Navy need to build fuel piers across the entire globe in support of the war on terrorism? The U.S. does not know where the war on terrorism will take us, but conventional (non-nuclear) naval vessels will require fuel to get there. NO NO
5
Getting fuel Forward presence Complying overseas Preventing pollution
Agenda Getting fuel Forward presence Complying overseas Preventing pollution Future implications
6
Where Navy ships get fuel
Location: At fuel pier At anchor Underway Location: At fuel pier At anchor Underway Location: At fuel pier At anchor Underway Location: At fuel pier At anchor Underway primary method “bunkering” FUEL Oil tanker
7
Implications of forward presence
Where could Navy ships refuel pier-side? from Atlantic Suez Aden USS Cole (Oct 2000) to Gulf
8
Refuel by “bunkering” in strategic harbors and bays
A solution Refuel by “bunkering” in strategic harbors and bays FUEL Navy vessel Oil tanker
9
Complying overseas Greek use of “dispersants” Host nation sensitivity
… sometimes less sensitive Oil spill sensitivity Greek use of “dispersants” Greek tanker Aegean Sea (1992)
10
Best management practices: Skimmer pre-positioned
Preventing pollution Best management practices: Skimmer pre-positioned Boom pre-deployed
11
… the Navy does not budget for spill response
Decision making Risk-adverse culture - “minimize risk” to: safety and health the environment mission success safety and health the environment mission success safety and health the environment mission success $ X … the Navy does not budget for spill response
12
= Global refueling need
Future implications Transformation: Expeditionary Strike Group Expeditionary Strike Group More battle groups Less ships (increased capabilities) Positioned at more locations = Global refueling need
13
the most sustainable solution
Conclusion USS Cole (Oct 2000) the most sustainable solution Environment Mission
14
Conventional Wisdom? Questions
15
this presentation, please leave your business card
for a copy of my paper or this presentation, please leave your business card Matt’s
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.