Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Reducing postharvest brown rot problems - a systems approach

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Reducing postharvest brown rot problems - a systems approach"— Presentation transcript:

1 Reducing postharvest brown rot problems - a systems approach

2 Booklet BMPs for brown rot (2015)
Resources Brown rot control – project SF12004 Booklet BMPs for brown rot (2015) Summerfruit – HIA (2015) Summerfruit - HIA (2015)

3 Best practices to reduce postharvest brown rot (a systems approach)
Know the disease risk factors Effective pre-harvest control Determination of rot risk at harvest Effective postharvest management

4 Know the disease risk factors
Block history (disease carry-over) Climatic conditions Crop susceptibility Stage of fruit maturity Fruit injuries increase susceptibility

5 Orchard sanitation key to reduce brown rot problems
Phases of brown rot Sources of spore for infection Twig blight Blossom blight (latent infection) Fruit rot Orchard sanitation key to reduce brown rot problems Post-harvest brown rot

6 Fruit susceptibility to Monilinia infection (fresh market)
Flowers & fruitlets susceptible Ripe fruit susceptible Immature fruit least susceptible around pit hardening Injury increases fruit susceptibility Kreidl, Edwards, Villalta (2015). APPJ

7 Monilinia spore infection requirements (Brochure)
Kreidl, Edwards, Villalta (2015). APPJ

8 Strategies for blossom blight and pre-harvest fruit brown rot control
well-timed application of protectant and post-infection fungicide sprays apply according to infection risk (ie spore infection risk and crop susceptibility) more targeted (risk-based) spray programs low disease blocks high disease blocks (ie late season cultivars)

9 Factors to consider in risk-based spray programs
Sanitation to reduce inoculum Infection risk high (blossom blight & young fruit): aim prevention primary infection Pre-harvest: risk very high ripe fruit Infection risk in green fruit depends on: weather, fruit injury, disease pressure, etc.

10 Effect of fungicide treatments on blossom blight incidence

11 Blossom blight control
integrate orchard sanitation, infection risk prediction and fungicide sprays 2-3 sprays required from 5% bloom, then full bloom (i.e. 80% bloom) to shuck-fall, adjusted as per infection period frequency and fungicide efficacy A preventive approach is more effective than relying on post-infection treatments

12 Efficacy of x2 pre-harvest fungicide sprays on fruit brown rot control
Late season nectarine, Victoria Crop stage Untreated With Tilt With Fontelis With BASF P With Luna Sensation With Syngenta P Bloom-shuck fall No sprays Chorus, Sumisclex, Syllit Chorus, Fontelis, Syllit Chorus, BASF P, Syllit Chorus, Bayer P, Syllit Chorus, Syngenta P, Syllit Green fruit Thiram Pre-harvest No spray Tilt x2 Fontelis x2 BASF P x2 Bayer P x2 Syngenta P x2 Please notice: BASF P, Syngenta P and Bayer P are NOT registered for stone fruit in Australia

13 EXAMPLE ONLY - PLEASE READ THE LABEL BEFORE USING FUNGICIDES
Example of fungicides used in commercial trials in stone fruit (fresh market) orchards during Tactics Bloom - shuck fall Post-bloom 30-50 days Pit hardening Pre-harvest 3-4 weeks Post-harvest Example existing fungicides* Chorus Sumisclex Syllit Thiram Tilt, etc Ziram Mancozeb, etc Tilt Saprol, etc Scholar Other? New chemistry (MRL issues?) Fontelis Luna Sensation _ Fontelis, Luna Sensation Spray interval? 7-10 days interval 14-30 days interval or as per rain 1-14 days interval * To prevent overuse, Tilt used preferably preventively or for post-infection ONLY when necessary? EXAMPLE ONLY - PLEASE READ THE LABEL BEFORE USING FUNGICIDES

14 Example typical spray program in blocks with brown rot problems (e. g
Example typical spray program in blocks with brown rot problems (e.g. late season cv) Sprays (black symbols) applied preventively before infection periods of low and high infection risk severity during flowering-shuck fall (pink), post-bloom (light green), post-pit hardening (green) and pre-harvest (red). This spraying strategy can be adjusted according to site disease pressure (i.e. over-wintered inoculum and crop susceptibility) and stages of fruit susceptibility. Always read the label before using a fungicide product.

15 Example spray program in a block with early season cv with low brown rot pressure
Mummies = 0% blossom blight = 0% green fruit = 0% brown rot = 0% Fungicide program Copper Ziram Sillyt Tilt Thiram Saprol

16 Example spray program in a block with late season cv with history of brown rot problems
Mummies = 2 m2 blossom blight = 0% green fruit = 0% brown rot = 7.5% Standard Treatment Copper Chorus Sumisclex Syllit Thiragranz Tilt

17 Management of pre-harvest brown rot
If weather wet and disease pressure high (e.g. spores around and fruit injury) – fruit must be protected with fungicides (ie 7-14 days intervals as per product efficacy) Benefits of pre-harvest sprays: inhibit sporulation of existing infections protect fruit from new infections reduce inoculum preventing more infections

18 Risk of brown rot at harvest and postharvest
Risk fruit rots at harvest: infections initiated early season (latent) infection during the fruit ripening period Risk fruit rots postharvest: quiescent (latent) infection in ripe fruit spores contaminating fruit surfaces spores in flumes and dump tank post-harvest decay fungi infect tissue mostly through wounds but also healthy tissues

19 Integrated postharvest control of brown rot and other decay-causing fungi
Management most effective using integrated strategy that includes: pre-harvest fungicide sprays (inhibit infections at harvest) determination of fruit infections (latent) at harvest post-harvest fungicides (protect fruit from infections) effective post-harvest sanitation decay control practices

20 Determination of fruit infection (latent) at harvest
Incubate fruit under moist conditions at room temperature (18-25°C) Assess fruit rot levels after 5-7 days incubation Collect min. 120 fruit per block (1 ha) 7 days before harvest

21 Estimate overall rot risk at harvest to develop a postharvest and market strategy
Overall rot risk: integrate orchard information (spray dairy, insect pressure, block history) with measured fruit rot levels Subsequent post-harvest handling practices will influence the overall risk! Infected fruit require post-harvest treatment Disease-free fruit for premium markets!

22 Effect of post-harvest treatments on brown rot control (fruit held for 10 days at 0°C and then 10 days at 20°C) x3 pre-harvest sprays + post-harvest treatment (Autumn Snow peach) x1 pre-harvest spray + post-harvest treatment : Arctic Snow nectarine

23 Control of blue mold wound infection by Scholar (apples)
Fruit wound-inoculated with Penicillium spp. Fruit dipped in various fungicide treatments Fruit stored for 2-3 weeks room temperature

24 Best postharvest practices to reduce decay-causing organisms
harvest fruit at right time, avoid injuries and cool quickly store fruit optimum temperature to retard ripening/softening remove plant pathogens from equipment with effective sanitisers sanitisers kill microorganisms and spores suspended in water but they often do not protect wounded tissue against subsequent infection from spores lodged in wounds

25 Disinfestation activity of some postharvest treatments
Delivery system Disinfestation Activity Chlorine water fruit surface/in solution Ozone water/air water poor solubility in air/antisporulation Scholar fungicide* wound protection *export MRLs concerns Always read the label before using a fungicide product.

26 Are there effective alternatives to post-harvest fungicides?
few products available with wide spectrum fungicidal activity alternatives are often less effective than fungicides biocontrols inconsistent control – compatibility issues with chemicals! high calcium content known to help reduce incidence fruit rots Key considerations when selecting post-harvest treatments: efficacy (pathogen type in the fruit and decay) location of pathogen in the fruit, is it a wound or contact protection product?

27 Acknowledgements HIA, Summerfruit Australia and DEDJTR for funding the research Team: Oscar Villalta, Robert Holmes, Simone Kreidl, Collaborators: Jacky Edwards, Kim Plummer, Phil Keane, Hu Baishi, Belen Guijarro, Chin Gouk, M. Hossain Many fruit growers in Renmark, Swan Hill, Cobram and Bangalow for collaborating with field trials

28 Thanks

29 Example of spectrum of activity of registered or proposed post-harvest fungicides in the USA
Class Crops Fungi/decay Fludioxonil Phenylpyrrole Stone fruit Pome fruit Brown rot, Gray mold, Rhizopus rot, Penicillium decays Fenhexamid Hydroxyanilide Stone fruit, pome fruit Brown rot, Gray mold Pyrimethanil Anilinopyrimidine Brown rot, Penicillium decay, Gray mold In Australia, fludioxonil,thiabendazole, iprodione and imazalil have been available for post-harvest control of fungal rots of pome fruit Always read the label before using a fungicide product.

30 Management of pre-harvest and post-harvest brown rot (continuation)
Benefits of sanitation post-harvest practices: maintain good sanitation to reduce spore levels available for infections harvest correct maturity for storage and reduce injuries use correct storage temperature to stop growth of target fruit rot fungi and slow decay development

31 Management of pre-harvest and post-harvest brown rot
Benefits of post-harvest fungicidal treatments: inhibit sporulation of existing infections prevent new infections (wound infections) is a contact or wound protection treatment?


Download ppt "Reducing postharvest brown rot problems - a systems approach"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google