Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Industrialized Democracies “…the worst from of government except for all the others that have been tried.”

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Industrialized Democracies “…the worst from of government except for all the others that have been tried.”"— Presentation transcript:

1 The Industrialized Democracies “…the worst from of government except for all the others that have been tried.”

2

3 Thinking About Democracy
Key Questions Why did democracy emerge in these countries? Why did democracy become so remarkably durable in the second half of the 20th century? Why is there so much debate about public policy in the industrialized democracies in the first years of the 21st century? why has that debate not gone one step farther and led many people to question their regimes or democracy itself?

4 elections key principles:
elections are about who governs, not basic principles voters choose who will govern in free, open, and reasonably honest elections elections are just part of the systems that guarantee basic personal and political freedoms

5 electoral differences among democracies
USA holds elections on fixed schedule; parliamentary systems do not USA and France elect their chief executives; Britain does not proportional, winner take all, coalition

6 differences in government
USA: division and separation of powers all legislation is a product of compromise Parliamentary system: unified or fused government party discipline usually guarantees support for majority’s legislative proposals

7 despite differences, countries that are democratic do 2 things:
guarantee individual liberties choose rulers through competitive elections democracy is about the relationship between the ruler and the rules

8 necessary features of a democracy
(1) rights: basic individual freedoms guaranteed (2) competitive elections government to be chosen through regular, free and fair elections (3) the rule of law clear, fair laws, in constitutions or statutes (vs. arbitrary, personal power)

9 (4) civil society and culture
in a stable democracy, people accept the rules and also “buy in” (5) capitalism and affluence without this, hard to sustain (1), (2) and (3) for extended time

10 The Origins of the Democratic State
domestic concerns more important than international concerns Eurocentric historical connection development took a long time

11 The Origins of the Democratic State
Evolution of democratic thought Hobbes Laissez-faire Locke Suffrage

12 recent origin of modern democracy (late 18th century)
opposition to society governed by feudal institutions, values and hierarchy key addition to democratic thought: limited government government as referee

13 Hobbes: how to avoid “war of all against all”?
cede some freedom to the Leviathan industrial capitalism  dominant economic system  shift toward democratic government laissez-faire capitalism: the invisible hand of the marketplace (liberal capitalism) Locke: role of the state: protect life, liberty and property

14 4 great transformations of the last 500 years
how countries handled the following = how democracy developed creation of the nation and state role of religion in society and government development of pressures for democracy the industrial revolution

15 where democratization was difficult, no consensual resolution  led to cleavages [deep social divisions] example of France and Italy: role of church in politics example of Germany and Italy: not unified states until late 19th century

16 economic and military “catch-up”: Britain/France vs
economic and military “catch-up”: Britain/France vs. Germany, Japan, Italy new democracies turned to authoritarian leaders and fascism influence of cold war on development of strong democratic states in Western Europe and Japan: containment

17

18 Political Culture and Participation
how people’s thoughts and actions can buttress or undermine democracies democratic beliefs coexisting with a degree of political passivity political efficacy + willingness to do anything because they trust leaders to do what is right

19 legitimacy : critical in successful democracies
people accept the rules of the game critical distinction between government and regime: can oppose the government without challenging the constitutional order itself feeling of legitimacy remains despite dramatic drop in most forms of political participation and trust for most politicians

20 social capital : degree to which a society has networks that build trust and cooperation
attitude of tolerance institutions that instill respect for views and actions of others

21 Political Parties and Elections
democracies give citizens many ways to participate in political life most important: participation in competitive elections political parties: the organizations responsible for contesting (running) elections and forming governments afterward

22

23 most political parties have roots in cleavages left by historical transformations (deeper in some countries than in others) typical left-right spectrum defines parties

24

25 left parties: remnants of communist parties
opposed capitalism, supported USSR during cold war social democratic parties: supported nationalization of industry, extensive social welfare programs, greater equality opposed USSR

26 liberals/radicals 19th century, supported fundamental change – separation of church and state, market economy democracy Christian Democratic Parties unresolved divisions over relationship between church and state appeal primarily to Catholics in Germany and France Right secular conservatives – values similar to Christian Dems but no religious agenda

27 catch-all parties try to appeal to all voters 1950s: shift in public opinion to center economic growth, expansion of welfare state, escalation of cold war end-of-ideology theory

28 growing influence of television
undermines ability of parties to take strong ideological positions, shape public opinion for long increase cynicism

29 Ideology Belief North America Liberalism Limited state role in society and economic activity; high degree of personal freedom over social equality Conservative Communism Limited personal freedom, strong state in order to achieve social equality; state owns property, market forces eliminated, state takes over economic decisions Radical Social Democracy/ Socialism Private property and markets, but strong state role in regulation and providing benefits to public; balance freedom and equality Liberal Fascism Low degree of personal freedom and equality in order to achieve powerful state Reactionary Anarchism Elimination of state and private property to achieve freedom and equality

30

31 postindustrial in last half century, advanced democracies have experienced clear shift from economies based primarily on industry and manufacturing to economies based on service

32 employment by economic sector, 1960 - 2004
SERVICES INDUSTRY AGRICULTURE United States 1960 2004 58% 78% 33% 20% 9% 2% Canada 55% 75% 32% 22% 13% 3% Japan 41% 68% 29% 28% 30% 4% France 39% 73% 38% 23%

33 postmodern premodern: focus on traditional forms of authority and basic survival modern: focus on rationality and science, individualism, autonomy, progress postmodern: focus on nonmaterial gain

34 postmaterialist rapid economic growth, improved living conditions 3rd affluent generation, assumed economic security focus on ‘higher order’ values: job and personal satisfaction, self-actualization, international understanding

35 postmaterialist, cont. less conservative than earlier generations of affluent voters not left – serious reservations about welfare state, socialism more supportive of peace and environmental movements most likely to support Green party agenda

36 the new right older, less educated, low skill most threatened by high-tech, automation, outsourcing priorities: maintain standard of living, national economic strength, security hostile to rights of women and minorities, supportive of economic nationalism and traditional values

37 realignment emergence of ‘new’ parties reflects how slowly individual parties and the national party system respond to social and economic change “realignment”: a shift in the basic electoral balance of power in which substantial groups in a society change their longterm party identification

38 dealignment always precedes realignment
realignment cont. dealignment always precedes realignment voters have to sever psychological ties rates of party identification have plummeted voter skepticism about what parties/ politicians can deliver

39 interest groups a feature of all industrialized democracies
trade unions, business groups and other associations that are most visible, disruptive and influential relationship between interest groups and decision makers varies tremendously from country to country interest groups that concentrate on economic issues and represent groups that are central to the country’s economic future tend to have most influence

40 political protest also a feature of all industrialized democracies
great variation in tactics, numbers, longevity, scope (national, regional, local), ideology main catalyst for anger: feeling that electoral process does not represent them most do not question legitimacy of the regime fringe groups have little influence

41 The Democratic State the power relationship between the state and society key feature: how representation of the people in government is handled informal access to government (political parties, interest groups, protest) do give citizens in industrial democracies more influence BUT democratic states do impose limits on what people can do

42 Presidential vs. Parliamentary systems
both based on critical democratic principle of competitive elections only one industrialized democracy has a true presidential system: USA

43 United States: overall intent of founders:
create a state in which it would be very difficult for rulers to: abuse power or act quickly need to compromise is not a problem – it is the norm

44 Parliamentary system: with a secure majority party or coalition, PM has little need to compromise
quick, decisive, predictable action US President: little leverage over what congress does – noncompliant bills can be drastically altered or easily defeated at many points – incoherent result Parliament: majority can guarantee that proposals it introduces are passed intact - compliant

45 US Presidential system: power is separated
Parliamentary system: power is fused after election, parliament selects PM not elected by country as a whole normally head of majority party or coalition parties PM appoints rest of the cabinet MPs who retain their seats while serving in the cabinet

46 Cabinet responsibility to Parliament
most important feature of parliamentary system government remains in office until the next election if and only if it retains the support of the majority on all major pieces of legislation

47 vote of confidence government must keep its majority on votes of confidence, in which parliament is explicitly asked to affirm its support for the government if government loses, it must resign a new majority can come into existence within existing parliament to form a new government or Parliament is dissolved, leading to new election

48 in Parliamentary system, legislative process rarely produces more than slight changes in an introduced bill where there is a clear majority in Parliamentary system, lobbyists have to exert their influence before legislation is submitted to parliament

49

50

51 the rest of the state: the bureaucrats
law making and governing requires expertise that most elected officials lack 2 additional sets of actors: civil servants in the bureaucracy leading interest group representatives

52 theoretically, civil servants are dispassionate and apolitical
recruited and promoted on basis of merit ideal: objective, scientific, expert, not motivated buy ideology or personal agenda, follow rules clearly laid out in law reality: civil servants are important, unelected, unaccountable policy makers

53 iron triangle alliance between business, bureaucratic and political elites in U.S., A close relationship between an agency, a congressional committee and an interest group

54

55 Public Policy orthodox economic theory: state should not interfere in economy properly functioning markets, driven by balancing effects of supply and demand will provide maximum wealth at minimum cost

56 limitations: free markets will not provide collective or public goods markets will only function optimally with certain conditions that they will not self-impose: competition, absence of concentration of wealth or power

57 Economic policy: from the interventionist state to privatization
made even more necessary after Industrial Revolution offers services that private/charitable sectors can’t or won’t offer basic health care education unemployment compensation pensions

58 21st century economic transformations  effects on economic policy of democratic states
economic center of gravity shifting from manufacturing to service sector millions of jobs lost to automation or to the third world globalization of economic activity  no state has the power it once had to enact and implement its own economic policies

59 Foreign policy cold war: most industrialized democracies followed foreign policy lead of USA post cold war: USA remains sole military superpower western allies remain close on most issues of national security more autonomy on issues of trade, environmental policy, etc. intersection of international relations and comparative politics


Download ppt "The Industrialized Democracies “…the worst from of government except for all the others that have been tried.”"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google