Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Integrative Projects: Getting Started

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Integrative Projects: Getting Started"— Presentation transcript:

1 Integrative Projects: Getting Started
sina mccants mossayeb teachers college, columbia university

2 selecting a research topic: range and scope
part one selecting a research topic: range and scope concept by charles tilly, columbia university (2006)

3 an instance: one time and place
changes accept answer and questions innovatory contribution: you contribute a seemingly new idea outside of existing arguments in the field provides new answer to old question significant contribution: you contribute new evidence / support to an existing argument, that has bearing on a controversy of the topic challenges accepted answer to old questions RANGE OF CONTRIBUTION (RESULTS) confirms contested answer to old questions basic contribution: you contribute more evidence / support to existing arguments modifies accepted answers to old questions an instance: one time and place confirms accepted answers to old questions fills in information gap SCOPE OF CONCLUSIONS an instance several instances all instances concept by charles tilly, columbia university (2006)

4 IMPACT RISK greatest risk greatest impact area of impact least impact
changes accept answer and questions greatest risk provides new answer to old question greatest impact challenges accepted answer to old questions IMPACT ON THE FIELD confirms contested answer to old questions RISK ASSOCIATED area of impact modifies accepted answers to old questions least impact confirms accepted answers to old questions fills in information gap least risk SCOPE The potential for impact on the field increases as scope and range of research increase however, there is a direct correlation between impact of innovatory research / more instances AND risk of strong opposition to your research findings concept by charles tilly, columbia university (2006)

5 IMPACT RISK area of impact
changes accept answer and questions greatest impact / greatest risk provides new answer to old question challenges accepted answer to old questions IMPACT ON THE FIELD confirms contested answer to old questions RISK ASSOCIATED area of impact modifies accepted answers to old questions confirms accepted answers to old questions fills in information gap least impact / least risk SCOPE the red shaded area represent the most risky area but potentially bears the greatest impact the blue shaded area represents the ideal range and scope of research for dissertation work the green shaded area represents the ideal range and scope of research for masters thesis / integrative projects concept by charles tilly, columbia university (2006)

6 Questions by Charles Tilly (2006)
AN ALL-PURPOSE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR RESEARCH PROPOSALS What main questions will your study address? Why, how, and to whom do those questions matter? What sorts of answers to those questions are worth considering? How will your study address the questions? What form will the evidence take? What are some possible conclusions from the evidence? What are the main technical problems you will have to solve? What are the main conceptual problems you will have to solve? What are the main theoretical problems you will have to solve? What are the main practical problems you will have to solve? Where will you start? Why there? What form will the final product(s) take? AN ALL-PURPOSE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PAPERS, THESES, & BOOKS In one sentence, what question(s) does this work answer? In one sentence, what answer(s) does it give? Who should care about the question(s)? Why and how? What other answers must we reject if we accept yours? Why should we prefer your answer(s)? How have you investigated the question(s)? What arguments and evidence are you presenting for your answer(s)? Why should we believe your arguments? Your evidence? If you are right, what general conclusions should we draw? Questions by Charles Tilly (2006)

7 part two ip proposal writing

8 IP Proposal Template 1. Title of Project
2. Research Question (1 sentence for each question) 3. Anticipated Findings (1-2 sentences) 4. Importance & Relevance (1 paragraph) 5. Foundational Theories (2-5 sentences) 6. Methods (2-5 sentences, use bullet points) 7. Unit of analysis (or) object of inquiry (1 sentence) 8. Selective Bibliography of Sources (5-10 sources) 9. Timeframe (create table or chart indicating the stages of your IP research/writing IP Proposal Template. Copyright 2006 – Sina M. Mossayeb

9 IP Proposal Template – Example
Title of Project: Emigration and Education: The Case of the Iranian-American Community Research Question: Do Iranians immigrate to the United States only because of “push factors” (i.e. situation in Iran) or are there “pull factors” that attract Iranian immigrants to the United States? More specifically, does perceived educational opportunity in the United States effect Iranians’ decision to immigrate to the United States. Anticipated Findings: While I anticipate that push factors are a driving force for migration, pull factors (such as perceived educational opportunity) might also play an influential role in the decision to immigrate specifically to the United States. If perceived educational opportunity in the United States and limited educational opportunity in Iran does affect the decision of Iranian immigrants, a new area of research related to emigration and education in the Iranian community will be opened. IP Proposal Template. Copyright 2006 – Sina M. Mossayeb

10 IP Proposal Template – Example (continued)
Importance & Relevance (Why is it important? To whom is it important?) Over 900,000 Iranians live in the United States today. Popular discourse about Iranian immigration to the United States focuses on the social and political freedoms associated with relocation. The prevailing literature on Iranian immigration explains why people leave Iran; but accounts remain limited to a unilateral force--namely, unfavorable conditions in Iran. I regard the study as a contributive investigation of the potential correlation between perceived educational opportunity (or lack thereof) and immigration. This study will highlight new areas requiring further research and identify a new motive for Iranian immigration to the United States. Subsequent findings will inform policy makers in the United States and Iran. IP Proposal Template. Copyright 2006 – Sina M. Mossayeb

11 IP Proposal Template – Example (continued)
Theoretical Foundation (theories, concepts, previous research, etc.) I draw on the historical and economic analysis of primarily three scholars (Sakurai, Habibi, and Torbat) who point to Iran’s (a) higher education screening policies; (b) degrading higher education quality; and (c) limited higher education access and capacity. According to the three authors, these constitute contributive “push factors” for emigration (in addition to social, political, and religious suppression). Therefore, the theoretical foundation on which I build my inquiry has to do the push factors above, inciting me to ask if there are any pull factors. Methods (How are you doing to answer your question?) Literature Review Analysis of Statistical Data (i.e. census data, etc.) Examination of Iranian Policies (government documents and statements) Survey of 101 Iranian-American immigrants (using internet surveys) Unit of Analysis (or) Object of Inquiry Iranian Immigrants to the United States IP Proposal Template. Copyright 2006 – Sina M. Mossayeb

12 IP Proposal Template – Example (continued)
Selective Bibliography List of 5-10 books, articles, and other sources. IP Timeframe (ex. Degree to be awarded in May) Approval of IP by Advisor in February 1st Degree Application turned in by February 1st First Final Draft of IP to be turned in April December January February March April Do preliminary research on topic Identify case and unit of analysis Write draft of topic question Collect 5-10 sources Come up with research methods Submit IP proposal(s) to advisor for consideration and feedback (come up with 1-3 proposals to be on the safe side) After receiving “go-ahead” from advisor read further sources and compile data If not begun, start writing IP After first draft is complete give to others to read for opinion and feedback Additional research if necessary Revisions to IP and preparation for final submission Make sure formatting is correct Turn in 1st Final Draft to Advisor IP Proposal Template. Copyright 2006 – Sina M. Mossayeb

13 … get started! sina mossayeb, peer advisor mossayeb@tc.edu
grace dodge hall + room wed (2-4) & thur (appointments) = advising


Download ppt "Integrative Projects: Getting Started"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google