Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Utilizing Feedback to Improve CPR Performance
Nicole Kupchik RN, MN, CCNS, CCRN, PCCN, CMC & Cindy Ruiz APN, MS, CCRN
2
Presenter Disclosure Information
Nicole Kupchik Utilizing Feedback to Improve CPR Performance FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Physio-Control Inc., Covidien (Speaker’s Bureau) UNLABELED/UNAPPROVED USES DISCLOSURE: None
3
Presenter Disclosure Information
Cindy Ruiz Utilizing Feedback to Improve CPR Performance FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: None UNLABELED/UNAPPROVED USES DISCLOSURE:
4
Objectives Describe the importance of measuring CPR rate, depth & chest compression fraction to improve CPR quality in hospital resuscitation events. Discuss ways to provide feedback and training to staff on CPR quality to improve performance. Facebook: Nicole Kupchik Consulting
5
Compression rate Too Slow Too Fast 100 – 120 per minute (Before 2010)
(After 2010) 100 – 120 per minute
6
Chest Compression Fraction
The amount of time spent providing compressions May also be called “compression ratio” Goal: At least 80%! Many high performing EMS systems shoot for >90% HUGE issue in hospital – Too many interruptions!
7
AHA Consensus Recommendation
2013 Consensus Recommendation “…resuscitation data from the defibrillator or any other device or source documentation that captures data at the scene should be used for feedback to the team.” Circulation, 2013
8
How do you implement change?
Resuscitations feel disorganized Humans + Adrenaline = Compressions that are WAY too fast!!! Too fast = too shallow & unlikely to have good recoil Metronomes + Capnography Need to measure performance & provide feedback!!!
9
CPR Report Card
10
CPR Report Card ROSC
11
Ventilations Assisted ventilations given every 3 – 4 seconds
12
Fast rates & depth CC Rate 141
13
Northwest Community Hospital’s story
In winter of 2014 Code Blue Committee wanted to increase our focus on high quality CPR & ETCO2 Had no way to assess CPR quality Inconsistent getting the ETCO2 device to codes We discovered we could download the CPR data from our defibs and review cases So we looked at some baseline data
14
December 2014 – Case #1
15
Case #1 20 sec.
16
Case #2 - Issues with fast CC Rates
17
Case #2 ROSC
18
Case #3 – Continued issues with CC rate
19
Case #3 ROSC
20
Case #4 - Pre shock pause issues
38 second pre-shock pause
21
Continued work to improve
Started Mock Codes Decided to focus on first responder activities: Activating the code Starting compressions Quality of compressions Airway AED Suction
22
Case #5 – 2 mos later - Improvement
8 second pulse check
23
Case #6 – Minimized pre & post shock pauses
2 seconds
24
Case #7 – Overall HUGE improvement!!!
25
Case #7 - Improvement
26
Case #7 - Rhythm check ONLY 3 second pulse check!!!!
27
More work to improve It was discovered at the mock codes staff fumbled to find to CPR mask – red stickers were posted on the drawer with the mask Pre-implementation survey Post-implementation staff surveys very positive!! But we wanted to do more to recognize their efforts!!!
28
How long is too long to attempt resuscitation?
58 y/o male admitted to the ortho unit post laminectomy 8 hours post-op he suffered 70 min Vfib arrest ETCO2 remained in the s during the code Taken to cath lab & stented The next day he was awake & alert but remained intubated Discharged to home on day 7 fully intact
29
Vfib arrest, shocked 8 times
Short pre & post shock pauses!!!! CCF was 81% CC rates were a bit fast, 120s – 130s
31
In conclusion… High Quality CPR is one of the most important aspects of successful resuscitation! Focus on minimizing interruptions in compressions Defibrillate early with minimal pre/post shock pauses You will not improve what you don’t measure!!!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.