Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

STATE v. WINDER 348 N.Y.S.2d 270 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1973)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "STATE v. WINDER 348 N.Y.S.2d 270 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1973)"— Presentation transcript:

1 STATE v. WINDER 348 N.Y.S.2d 270 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1973)
Case Brief Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

2 Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
STATE v. WINDER PURPOSE: Winder refines the boundaries of unauthorized practice of law, stressing the personal contact character of lawyer-client relations. Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

3 Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
STATE v. WINDER CAUSE OF ACTION: Proceeding to enjoin alleged unlawful practice of law. Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

4 Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
STATE v. WINDER FACTS: Winder sold a “Divorce Yourself Kit” with forms and instructions. Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

5 Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
STATE v. WINDER ISSUE: Whether selling the Kit constituted unlawful practice of law. Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

6 Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
STATE v. WINDER HOLDING: No, selling the Kit was not the practice of law, but enjoining the defendant from advising and counseling individuals on specific problems was proper. Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.

7 Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.
STATE v. WINDER REASONING: Personal contact is an essential ingredient of the attorney-client relationship (representing and advising a particular person in a particular situation). This is not present in selling forms or books about the law and is therefore not the practice of law. Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.


Download ppt "STATE v. WINDER 348 N.Y.S.2d 270 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1973)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google