Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

New Jersey Department of Education December 2012

Published byChester Jennings Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "New Jersey Department of Education December 2012"— Presentation transcript:

1 New Jersey Department of Education December 2012
Performance Division 2012 Student Outcomes New Jersey Department of Education December 2012 New Jersey Department of Education

2 Agenda The 2011 graduation data in a national context
The 5-year, adjusted cohort graduation rate, 2011 cohort The 4-year, adjusted cohort graduation rate, 2012 cohort 2012 Language Arts Results 2012 Mathematics Results 2012 Science Results Quick Looks Charter School Improvement Grant (SIG) Grantee Results Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

3 Graduation Rates Performance Division
New Jersey Department of Education

4 The 4-Year, Adjusted Cohort Rate
Beginning in 2011, New Jersey calculated subgroup, school, district, and state graduation rates using the federally-mandated “adjusted cohort” calculation, based on student-level data submitted by districts over the past four years in NJSMART. The “adjusted cohort” formula divides the number of 4-year graduates (i.e., those students receiving a diploma) by the number of first-time ninth graders who entered the cohort four years earlier. In equation form, the rate calculates: Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education 4-Year Cohort Graduates in Year 2011 [First-Time 9th Graders in Fall 2007] + [Transfers In] – [Verified Transfers Out] – [Excluded From Cohort]

5 The 5-Year, Adjusted Cohort Rate
The “5-year adjusted cohort” formula divides the number of 5-year graduates (i.e., those students receiving a diploma) by the number of first-time ninth graders who entered the cohort five years earlier. In equation form, the rate calculates: Performance Division 5-Year Cohort Graduates in Year 2012 [First-Time 9th Graders in Fall 2007] + [Transfers In] – [Verified Transfers Out] – [Excluded From Cohort] New Jersey Department of Education

6 Understanding “Adjusted”
Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

7 2011 Results, ‘sister’ states
Special Education Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged New Jersey 83% (12th) 73% (4th) 68% (11th) 71% (19th) Maryland 83% 57% 54% 74% Massachusetts 66% 56% 70% Connecticut 61% 59% 62% Pennsylvania 71% 63% New York 77% 48% 46% 69% Delaware 78% 65% Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education Important notes: While the methodology is the same across the country, each state is able to define its own criteria for what is a ‘graduate’ in terms of exit exams, course taking and passing requirements, and the use of alternative pathways to demonstrating mastery of state standards. USDOE released this data provisionally in November 2012.

8 2011 Results, ‘sister’ states
African American Hispanic Asian White New Jersey 69% (24th) 73% (15th) 93% (2nd) 90% (3rd) Maryland 76% 72% 93% 89% Massachusetts 71% 62% 88% Connecticut 64% 92% Pennsylvania 65% New York 63% 86% Delaware 73% 90% 82% Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education Important note: Results show that we outrank all of our sister states in every category except for “African American” & “Economically Disadvantaged”

9 NJ grad rates for 2011 cohort, 4 v. 5 year
Statewide 83% 86% Limited English Proficient 68% 77% Special Education 73% 78% Economically Disadvantaged 71% African American 69% 74% Asian 93% 95% Hispanic White 90% 92% Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

10 NJ 4-year grad rate, 2011 v. 2012 2011, 4-year 2012, 4-year Statewide
83% 86% Limited English Proficient 68% 73% Special Education 74% Economically Disadvantaged 71% 75% African American 69% Asian 93% 95% Hispanic 77% White 90% Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

11 NJ 4-year grad rate for large urban districts, 2011 v. 2012
Statewide 83% 86% Camden 56.9% 49.3% Jersey City 69.9% 67.3% Newark 61.3% 68.7% Paterson 64.0% 66.4% Trenton 47.7% 48.4% Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

12 Describing the cohorts
2011 2012 Count of Graduates 95,185 93,818 Count in Adjusted Cohort 114,449 108,510 Drop out 5,383 4,771 Exempt from Cohort 6,519 6,854 Unverified Transfers 6,802 3,840 Continuing 7,080 5,776 Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

13 2012 Graduation Appeals September 10th through October 5th.
3,350 student-level high school graduation rate appeals were filed by 109 unique districts compared to 7,500 in 2011. LEAs reported that the new user interface within NJ SMART was easy to navigate and that user support guides, live trainings, and FAQs were clear and intuitive. Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

14 Reasons for Appeal Performance Division
New Jersey Department of Education

15 Graduation Pathways 2011, 4-year 2012, 4-year HPSA graduate 82% 80%
AHSA/Appeal/Other 14% 17% Exempt from Passing 4% Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

16 Language Arts Literacy (LAL)
Performance Division Language Arts Literacy (LAL) New Jersey Department of Education

17 LAL Proficiency and Above By Grade
Grade Level 2009 2010 2011 2012 Difference Third 62.8 59.7 63.1 66.8 3.7 Fourth 63.0 59.5 58.6 -4.2 Fifth 65.8 61.0 62.1 1.1 Sixth 69.7 65.3 64.6 -2.2 Seventh 71.9 69.0 63.4 -2.4 Eighth 81.7 82.2 82.0 -0.1 HSPA Aggregate 87.4 89.1 90.7 92.7 2.0 NJASK Aggregate 69.2 66.5 66.6 65.9 -0.7 Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

18 NJASK LAL Gaps, Proficient and above
Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

19 HSPA LAL Gaps, Proficient and above (Includes re-takers)
Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

20 3rd grade targets in language arts
Yearly progress target gain, based on a 2011 proficiency of 63.1%, six year horizon 2012 results (surpassing goal of 66.2%) Progress goal in 2013 Count of 3rd grade students not proficient in LAL in 2012 Number of new proficient students needed to make progress goal in 2013 3.1% Performance Division 66.8% 69.2% 34,000 New Jersey Department of Education 2,035

21 Performance Division Mathematics New Jersey Department of Education

22 MATH Proficiency and Above By Grade
Grade Level 2009 2010 2011 2012 Difference Third 75.1 77.9 78.8 78.3 -0.5 Fourth 72.8 76.8 79.1 77.1 -2.0 Fifth 77.2 78.6 80.5 83.1 2.6 Sixth 70.8 71.7 77.4 1.4 Seventh 66.3 64.3 65.8 63.3 -2.5 Eighth 71.2 68.4 71.5 0.2 HSPA Aggregate 81.0 80.7 82.3 83.3 1.0 NJASK Aggregate 72.2 73.0 75.5 75.3 -0.2 Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

23 NJASK Math Gaps, Proficient and above
Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

24 HSPA Math Gaps, Proficient and above (Includes re-takers)
Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

25 Performance Division Science New Jersey Department of Education

26 Science, Proficient and above
Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

27 Biology End Of Course, Proficient and above
Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

28 Performance Division Quick Looks New Jersey Department of Education

29 LAL Proficiency 2011 and 2012: Charter
Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

30 Math Proficiency 2011 and 2012: Charter
Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

31 Cohort One SIG Grantees, Language Arts
Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

32 Cohort One SIG Grantees, Math
Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

33 Cohort Two SIG Grantees, Language Arts
Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

34 Cohort Two SIG Grantees, Math
Performance Division New Jersey Department of Education

35 Questions? Thank You! Performance Division
New Jersey Department of Education Thank You!

Download ppt "New Jersey Department of Education December 2012"

Similar presentations

Wyoming Public High Schools The Federal Four-Year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate, or “on- time” graduation rate, is based on requirements introduced by.

Wyoming Public High Schools The Federal Four-Year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate, or “on- time” graduation rate, is based on requirements introduced by.
Understanding the New Graduation Rate Sample Presentation 1.

Understanding the New Graduation Rate Sample Presentation 1.
Cohort Graduation Exit Code Review December 18, 2014.

Cohort Graduation Exit Code Review December 18, 2014.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores 2003 -2011 Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.

NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.
School Report Cards 2004–2005. 2 The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.

School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE 2009-10 Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Orange Data Outcomes NJASK and HSPA October 2013 1.

Orange Data Outcomes NJASK and HSPA October
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.

1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
1 Cohort Graduation Rate October 1, 2010 Jonathan Wiens, Assessment and Accountability Greg Houser, Student Learning and Partnerships Oregon Department.

1 Cohort Graduation Rate October 1, 2010 Jonathan Wiens, Assessment and Accountability Greg Houser, Student Learning and Partnerships Oregon Department.
New DC OSSE ESEA Accountability. DC OSSE ESEA Accountability Classification Overview I. DC OSSE Accountability System II. Classification of Schools III.

New DC OSSE ESEA Accountability. DC OSSE ESEA Accountability Classification Overview I. DC OSSE Accountability System II. Classification of Schools III.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.

2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.

Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
1 Graduation and Other Results: Students Who Began 9 th Grade in 2000 and 2001.

1 Graduation and Other Results: Students Who Began 9 th Grade in 2000 and 2001.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.

1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Carolyn M. Wood - Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems October 31, 2012 1.

Carolyn M. Wood - Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems October 31,
Graduation – 2013 Cohort New Jersey Department of Education.

Graduation – 2013 Cohort New Jersey Department of Education.
How Does Oregon Report Graduation Rates? Cohort Graduation Rate This year’s release reports on graduation rates for students who first entered high school.

How Does Oregon Report Graduation Rates? Cohort Graduation Rate This year’s release reports on graduation rates for students who first entered high school.
1 2011 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.

Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.

MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google