1. TALENTS IN MOTION-ENCURAGING THE GIFTED IN THE CONTEXT OF MIGRATION AND INTERCULTURAL EXCANGE
15th International ECHA Conference Talents in Motion-Encuraging the Gifted in the context of migration and Intercultural exchange March, Vienna, Ljiljana Krneta, PhD, Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Banja Luka, BiH

2. There are different theoretical models of giftedness, those:
Introduction
There are different theoretical models of giftedness, those:
Based on hereditary factors - genetic studies, (Mönks and Mason, 1993; Marland, 1997;
Based on cognitive factors - Sternberg (1990,2001)
Studying the student achievement (Renzulli, 1986, Koren, 1989)
Sistematic approaches (Tannenbaum, 1983; Heller, 1996;Gojkov, 2006, 2012 )

3. Introuction
There is still no consensus on what it means to be gifted and different models have different identification strategies
Some of the research in BH, last years, has been conducted on:
- the status of gifted students in society and school in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Krneta,D. and Krneta, Lj.,2006, 2008)
- gifted perceptions (Krneta,Lj. 2010, 2012, 2013.)
- how to encourage gifted students (Krneta,D.,2014)

4. Method Empirical - nonexperimental research, transversal study
Survey and theoretical-comparative approach
Research problem: - Is there difference in perception of present and vision of future between gifted and other studens?
Two hypotesis:
- There is a statisticaly significant difference in perception of present between gifted and other students
- There is a statisticaly significant difference in vision of future between gifted and other students

5. METHOD
Sample is stratified-purposive sample
1155 students primary (58,78%)and high school (42,22%) Bosnia and Herzegovina,
14-18 years old,
557 (48,22%)male
593(51, 56%) female
Dwelling:vilage, small town, big town

6. INSTRUMENTS
Scale teacher is working efficiency perception –was constructed according to the model of Likert scale
It is fave levels scale, consisted 16 statmens, Scale is designed for research purposes
Questionnaire for students (designed for the purpose of this research with questions regarding students socio-economic status, gender,school achivement from current and last school year...)
The test of general intelligence F-2: two groups, on the basis of IQ tests:low and high results. Test IQ:was applied wich is based on perceptual speed, more or less complex visual structures.

7. RESULTS AND DISSCUSION
Table 1. Distribution of results of perception of present
Chi-square = 9,55; df=3;p=0.023, statisticaly significant at 0.05 level
What are your thoughts and views on present? AM
Strongly agree
Mostly agree
Neutral
Mostly disagree
Strongly disagree
...I feel hopeless
4.22 16
2.32 44
6.39 92
13.37
144
20.93
390
56.68
...I am dissapointed with my life
4.17 28
4.06 42
6.10
104
15.11
124
18.02
...I feel unhapy
3.99 30
4.36
110
15.98
114
16.56
368
53.48
...I feel very happy
3.92
240
34.88
226
32.84
172
25.00 20
2.90

8. RESULTS AND DISSCUSION
Table 2 - Distribution of results of vision of future
Chi-square=3,975;df=3;p=0.26 and is not statisticaly significant
What are your thoughts and views on future AM
Very much
Somewhat
Moderately
Not really
Not at all
How much you believe your future will be good?
3.64
120
17.44
248
36.04
278
40.40 36
5.23 6
.87
How much wellbeing do you expect in your future?
3.63 96
13.95
294
42.73
250
36.33 42
6.10
Are you worried when thinking about future?
3.43 58
8.43 50
7.26
236
34.30
216
31.39
126
18.31
Do you fear future?
3.29 72
10.46 74
10.75
228
33.13
184
26.74

9. RESULTS AND DISSCUSION
Results of discriminant analysis indicate that are significant differences in the perception of the teachers working efficiency between students from different levels of intellectualabilities.
Differences between students with low and high intelectual abilities are related to the following operating characteristic of the teachers:“Does not make a differences among students“,Contributes to the overall development of students personality“, Serve as a role model for students, „Knows his own profession,

10. Results and disscusion
„Successfully transfers knowladge to students“.
Students who have high intellectual abilities often perceive that an effective teacher needs to“ Successfully transfer the knowledge“.
The results proved the starting hypotesis that there are differences in the perception of the performance of effective teachers with respect to the intellectual abilities of students.

11. RESULTS AND DISSCUSION
Practical implications: the purpose of the research results is to bring about better understanding of the gifted and other students
The results are specific for one point in time because of the transversal research
Further research is needed in order to understand more the gifted and their positon in the society.

12. IN PRACTICE
POSTER „ RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTELLECTUAL OF STUDENTS AND PERCEPTION OF WORK EFFICIENCY OF THE TEACHERS“
FLAJERI: Ljiljana KRNETA, PhD, Faculty of Political Scineces ,University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Vanja NISIC, Master sociology, Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Banja Luka, BiH
Duško BAJIĆ, Academy of ARTS, University of Banja Luka, BiH
Dušan UROSEVIC,,Academy of ARTS, University of Banja, BiH
Milos VUJIC, Master Academy of Fine Arts, University Belgrade, Serbia

13. BIBLIOGRAFY
- Andrilović, V. Čudina, M. (1985), Psihologija učenja i nastave, Zagreb, Školska knjiga
- Đurić, Đ., (1987), Vaspitanje mladih u višenacionalnoj zajednici, Novi Sad, Pedagoški zavod Vojvodine,
- Gojkov, G.(2008):Didaktika darovitih, Vršac, Visoka škola strukovnih studija za vaspitače, M.Pavlov
- Gojkov, G. i Stojanović, A.(2010): Purpose in value structure of the gifted as critical ability and inner moral guide, Zbornik II- International scientific konference, Bled. Slovenia
- Juriševič. M.i Vogrinc, J.(2013):Aktualna i metodološka vprašanja na področju identifikacije nadarjenih učencev v Sloveniji, Zbornik 18-Metodološki problemi istraživanja darovitosti, Vršac, Visoka škola strukovnih studijaza vaspitače i Univerzitet de vest Aurel Vlajku,
Arad, Ruminija
- Havelka, N. i sar. (1993): Efekti osnovnog školovanja, Beograd,Institut za psihologiju,
- Hoogeveen, L.(2010): The social emotional effects of special educational provisions forgifted children, Zbornik-II International scientific konference 2010, Bled, Slovenia
- Sutherland, M. (2010): The early years:firm foundations for future success, Zbornik-II International scientific konference, 2010, Bled, Slovenia
- Vlahović, V.-Štetić, Urednica(2008): Daroviti učenici; teorijski pristup i primjena u školi,Zagreb, Institut za društvena istraživanja u Zagrebu,
- Rot, N. i Havelka, N., (1972): Izrada skale za ispitivanje oblika nacionalne vezanosti, Ljubljana , IV Kongres psihologa Jugoslavije,
- Krneta, Lj.(2013): Ličnost učenika i percepcija radne efikasnosti nastavnika, Grafid, Banja Luka
Krneta, Lj. i Simunić, E. (2012): Podsticanje emocionalne kompetentnosti darovitih učenika u školi, Zbornik 11, Metodološki problemi istraživanja darovitosti , Vršac,Visoka škola strukovnih studija za obrazovanje vaspitača i Univerzitet de vast Aurel Vlajku, Arad, Rumunija
Krneta, Lj.(2014): Perseption of Present and Vision of gifted students, 14 Internacionalna konferencija ,ECHA –Digital age of gifted, Ljubljana, Slovenia

14. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION ! krnetaljiljana@yahoo.com

15. THE GIFTED AND OTHER STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF THE PRESENT AND THEIR VISION OF THE FUTURE
14th International ECHA Conference Thinking Giftedness - Giftedness in the Digital Age September, Ljubljana Ljiljana Krneta, PhD, Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Banja Luka, BiH