Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Jasper E. Hunt with Robin A. Barry, Ph.D.
How Telling is Author Voice? Further Associations Between Personality and Writing Jasper E. Hunt with Robin A. Barry, Ph.D. Dept. of Psychology University of Wyoming
2
A Note on Writing “The problem of language acquisition is extremely complex. It is difficult to give precise definitions of the concept of ‘language’ and the concept of ‘acquisition’ and the concept of ‘children.’ There is much uncertainty about the interpretation of experimental data and a great deal of controversy surrounding the theories. More research needs to be done.” - Steven Pinker, The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person’s Guide to Writing in the 21st Century!
3
A Note on Writing “When we open a cookbook, we completely put aside—and expect the author to put aside—the kind of question that leads to the heart of certain philosophic and religious traditions. Is it possible to talk about cooking? Do eggs really exist? Is food something about which knowledge is possible? Can anyone ever tell us anything true about cooking? … We do not expect the writer to be immobilized by preliminary discussions of whether it is possible to talk about ‘cooking,’ if such a thing even exists.” - Francis-Noël Thomas & Mark Turner, Clear and Simple as the Truth: Writing Classic Prose
4
Why Study Writing? The human condition Scientific interest
How variable are writing tendencies? What is personality? Practical interest: anonymity/privacy
5
Where Do We Stand? “That people differ in the ways they talk and write is hardly a novel observation.” (Pennebaker & King, 1999) Writing is an individual difference for: Writing is associated with a variety of personality variables
6
Formal Informal vs.
7
The Present Study: Participants/Measures
86 cohabiting couples (82 opposite-sex, 4 same-sex) Age: M = 23.02, SD = 4.07 Marital Status: Not married (83%), Married (11%), Engaged (6%) Measures Relational attachment style (Fraley, Waller, & Brennan, 2000) Mindfulness (MAAS; Brown & Ryan, 2003) Ruminative response style (RRS; Treynor, Gonzales, & Nolen- Hoeksema, 2003; Whitmer & Gotlib, 2011) Self-trust not to commit relational transgressions
8
The Present Study: Procedure
Participants completed personality measures Participants then wrote about a time when they felt emotionally vulnerable Knew they would have a conversation about it with their partner Almost all participants wrote informally (e.g. bullet-point lists) Writing samples were linguistically analyzed using LIWC software (Pennebaker, Francis, & Booth, 2001) Correlational analysis was used to determine relationships between writing styles and personality variables
10
Interpretation People who trust themselves not to commit relational transgressions write less! Trust to not physically hurt one’s partner explains 15.9% of WC variation People who brood use more words and a greater variety of words when writing about their vulnerability Weak effects across the board
11
Discussion (So what?) Even informal writing reflects personality
Language use is an individual difference Ecological validity Be careful what you write online!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.