1. Date of download: 10/23/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Constitutive Model for Soft Materials Incorporating Viscoelasticity and Mullins Effect
J. Appl. Mech. 2016;84(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
(a) Nominal stress–stretch curves of the tough gel under uniaxial cyclic loading at different loading rates and (b) nominal stress–stretch curves of the tough gel under multiple uniaxial cyclic loading

2. Date of download: 10/23/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Constitutive Model for Soft Materials Incorporating Viscoelasticity and Mullins Effect
J. Appl. Mech. 2016;84(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Rheological model with Mullins effect: (a) a damageable spring in series with a Kevin unit and (b) a damageable spring in parallel with a Maxwell unit

3. Date of download: 10/23/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Constitutive Model for Soft Materials Incorporating Viscoelasticity and Mullins Effect
J. Appl. Mech. 2016;84(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
(a) Samples of four different materials and (b) Shimadzu tensile tester

4. Date of download: 10/23/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Constitutive Model for Soft Materials Incorporating Viscoelasticity and Mullins Effect
J. Appl. Mech. 2016;84(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Nominal stress–stretch curves for uniaxial tension tests at a nominal strain rate 3.33×10-3/s : (a) tough gel, (b) VHB, (c) NBR, and (d) PU. The dots are experimental data and the solid lines are theoretical predictions.

5. Date of download: 10/23/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Constitutive Model for Soft Materials Incorporating Viscoelasticity and Mullins Effect
J. Appl. Mech. 2016;84(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Representative profile of the history of applied stretch in stress relaxation tests

6. Date of download: 10/23/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Constitutive Model for Soft Materials Incorporating Viscoelasticity and Mullins Effect
J. Appl. Mech. 2016;84(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Experimental results and theoretical predictions for stress relaxation tests of the tough gel under different loading rates (a), (c) stress–stretch curves and (b), (d) stress-time history

7. Date of download: 10/23/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Constitutive Model for Soft Materials Incorporating Viscoelasticity and Mullins Effect
J. Appl. Mech. 2016;84(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Experimental results and theoretical predictions for stress relaxation tests of VHB under different loading rates

8. Date of download: 10/23/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Constitutive Model for Soft Materials Incorporating Viscoelasticity and Mullins Effect
J. Appl. Mech. 2016;84(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Experimental results and theoretical predictions for stress relaxation tests of NBR under different loading rates

9. Date of download: 10/23/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Constitutive Model for Soft Materials Incorporating Viscoelasticity and Mullins Effect
J. Appl. Mech. 2016;84(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Experimental results and theoretical predictions for stress relaxation tests of PU under different loading rates

10. Date of download: 10/23/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Constitutive Model for Soft Materials Incorporating Viscoelasticity and Mullins Effect
J. Appl. Mech. 2016;84(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Comparisons of stress–stretch curves for the tough gel under different loading rates. The curve under the loading rate 3.33×10-3/s is from the uniaxial tensile test. The curves under the other two loading rates are from the stress relaxation tests.