1. Tom Lastoskie Chair Jack Galuardi Vice Chair
ESH Committee
Tom Lastoskie
Chair
Jack Galuardi
Vice Chair

2. Overview Workshop Presentation/Discussion
Results of 2016 “Green’ Team Workshop Activity
ESH Committee Membership
Items of Discussion/Contention
Do We Need to Add New Criteria?
New ‘Thread’ or Incorporate in ‘Existing Thread’?
How to Codify These Changes?
Do We Use the Term ESH or EHS?
‘Special Handling’ Needs Better Definition/Explanation in the MRL Deskbook and User Guide
Proposed Actions

3. Results of 2016 “Green’ Team ESH Workshop Activity

4. Feedback on Proposed Matrix Change (From 2016 MRL Workshop) Environmental, Safety, and Health
‘Green’ Team Assessment of proposed additional criteria
Value added: potentially
Recommendations:
Investigate as an additional thread, not incorporated in existing threads
General Comments/ Observations
Criteria need to be at a high level (addressing mfg issues and concerns)
Criteria should be able to observe this on the floor
Needed (early and often) (industry)
May be out of scope (govt) and scope creep (industry)
Recommended Actions
Needs a lot more work

5. ‘Green’ Team Members (2016)
-Tom Lastoskie – AFIT (OPR)
-Jack Galuardi – APT
-Harry Diaz – DCMA
-Michael Ganowsky – Boeing
-Jason Schmidt – Boeing
-Greg Krieger – BAE
Rob Arthur – DAU
Scott Pearl – AFRL
Josh Rosen – Northrop
-Eric Whitman – Draper
Jordan Masters – ARDEC
Gary Stanley – OSD Ctr
-Steve Anderson – NAVAIR

6. All members verified their membership
ESH Committee Members
Tom Lastoskie – Chair
Jack Galuardi – Vice Chair
Michael Ganowsky – Member, Boeing
Jason Schmidt – Member, Boeing
Greg Krieger – Member, BAE
Eric Whitman – Member, Draper
Harry Diaz-Agosto – Member, DCMA
Steve Anderson – Member, Navy (NAVAIR)
David Karr – Member, USAF (LCMC)
All members verified their membership
All members verified their membership

7. Items of Discussion/Contention

8. Do We Need to Add New Criteria?
Overwhelmingly, the answer is YES!!!

9. 2. New ‘Thread’ or Incorporate in
‘Existing Thread’?
This item is the ‘Contentious’ area!
A few points:
Predominately, DoD personnel want to keep the current Matrix setup of 9 Threads
Predominately, Industry personnel would like to have a 10th Thread for ESH
A Majority of personnel stated that ESH is NOT a primary functional responsibility of Manufacturing/Quality
Compromise is necessary to move forward

10. 3. How to Codify These Changes?
Add/Update Criteria
Update ‘MRL Users Guide’ to Reflect Changes to Criteria

11. 4. Do We Use the Term ESH or EHS?
No strong feedback on either term

12. 5. ‘Special Handling’ Needs Better Definition/Explanation in the MRL Deskbook and User Guide
Overwhelmingly, the answer is YES!!!

13. Proposed Actions for ESH (5 Items)

14. Update Criteria as Identified on the File ‘MRL_Matrix_with_ESH_Updates_for_worksho p.xlsx’ for Threads ‘D’ and ‘H’; Sub-Threads ‘D.4 – Special Handling’ and ‘H.2 – Facilities’
This Action to be Agreed/Completed at this Workshop
Update ‘MRL Users Guide’ to Reflect Changes to Criteria and Incorporate the ‘Industry Comments/Recommendations’ included in the above File

15. Select the Term ESH or EHS
Incorporate New Wording in the MRL Deskbook to Address Situations Where Industry May Look at Some Areas of Manufacturing/Quality Differently Than DoD
This Action to be Started (Hopefully, Agreed/Completed) at this Workshop
Select the Term ESH or EHS
This Action to be Agreed/Completed at this Workshop
Define/Explain ‘Special Handling’ With Better Wording in the MRL Deskbook and User Guide