Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDamian Walsh Modified over 6 years ago
1
*University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
The CRYSTAL trial: Efficacy and safety of irinotecan and 5-FU/FA with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer Eric Van Cutsem*, M Nowacki, I Lang, S Cascinu, I Shchepotin, J Maurel, P Rougier, D Cunningham, J Nippgen, C-H Köhne *University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
2
Cetuximab: mechanism of action
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is expressed by most CRCs Cetuximab is an IgG1 monoclonal antibody that: Specifically targets EGFR with high affinity Inhibits endogenous ligand binding thereby blocking dimerization, TK phosphorylation, and receptor-dependent downstream signaling Induces antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC)
3
Phase I/II trials: cetuximab plus irinotecan in first line mCRC
+ 5-FU/LV/ irinotecan (IFL) 1 + 5-FU/LV/ irinotecan (FOLFIRI)2 Cetuximab + 5-FU/LV/ irinotecan (AIO)3 No. of patients 29 42 21 Response rate (CR+PR) 48% 45% 67% Stable disease (SD) 42% 38% 29% Disease control (CR+PR+MR+SD) 90% 83% 96% Median survival (months) NA 23 33 1Rosenberg et al. ASCO 2002:Abstr 536; 2 Rougier et al, ASCO 2004:Abstr 3513; 3Folprecht et al. Ann Oncol 2006;17:
4
CRYSTAL trial: Study design
Cetuximab + FOLFIRI Cetuximab IV 400 mg/m2 on day 1, then 250 mg/m2 weekly + irinotecan (180mg/m2) + 5-FU (400 mg/m2 bolus + 2400 mg/m2 as 46-hr continuous infusion) + FA every 2 weeks EGFR-expressing metastatic CRC R FOLFIRI irinotecan (180 mg/m2) + 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus + 2400 mg/m2 as 46-hr continuous infusion) + FA every 2 weeks Stratification factors: Regions ECOG PS Populations Randomized patients n=1217 Safety population n=1202 ITT population: n=1198
5
CRYSTAL trial: Study endpoints
Primary endpoint: Progression-free survival time (as assessed by blinded independent review) Secondary endpoints: Overall response rate (independently reviewed) Disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) Overall survival time Quality of life (EORTC QLQ C30) Safety
6
CRYSTAL trial: Statistical considerations
Assumption for sample size calculation: 633 events (documented PDs) required to detect a hazard ratio of 0.8 with 80% power Protocol required a sample size of 1080 patients A central stratified permuted block randomization procedure was used with regions (Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Rest of World) and ECOG PS (0/1, 2) as randomization strata Two interim assessments of safety data were conducted by an independent DSMB Assessments were performed every 8 weeks
7
CRYSTAL trial: Main inclusion criteria
Histologically confirmed unresectable mCRC EGFR expression in primary tumor or metastasis as detected by IHC ≥ 1 bi-dimensionally measurable lesion No previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease; adjuvant therapy was allowed if stopped at least 6 months before randomization (no irinotecan) ECOG PS ≤ 2 at study entry Adequate organ and bone marrow function Signed informed consent
8
CRYSTAL trial: Patient baseline characteristics (1)
ITT population FOLFIRI n=599 Cetuximab + FOLFIRI Median age, years [range] 61 [ ] [ ] Gender, % Male Female 59 41 62 38 ECOG PS, % 1 2 53 43 4 55 Tumor localization, % Colon Rectum Colon and rectum 60
9
CRYSTAL trial: Patient baseline characteristics (2)
ITT population, % FOLFIRI n=599 Cetuximab + FOLFIRI Adjuvant chemotherapy 17 19 Radiotherapy pre-treatment 12 11 No. metastatic sites ≤ 2 83 86 Liver metastases only 22 20 LDH > UNL 45 Alk. Phosph. ≥ 300 U/L 13 Leucocytes > 10,000/mm3 16
10
CRYSTAL trial: Safety: Grade 3/4 AE
FOLFIRI n=602, % Cetuximab + FOLFIRI n=600, % Any 59.5 78.0 Neutropenia 23.3 26.7 Febrile neutropenia 2.2 2.7 Diarrhea 10.5 15.2 Vomiting 5.0 4.5 Fatigue Skin reactionsa 0.2 18.7 Infusion-related reactions 2.3 aThere were no grade 4 skin reactions Magnesium levels were measured in only 20% of the patients (0.2% vs. 1.8%)
11
CRYSTAL trial: Reasons for treatment discontinuation
*SD=symptomatic deterioration
12
CRYSTAL trial: Deaths on study
FOLFIRI n=602, % Cetuximab + FOLFIRI n=600, % All deaths within 60 days after treatment start 3.0 3.2 All deaths from treatment start to 30 days after end of treatment - of these treatment-related* 4.3 1.0 5.5 0.8 *No deaths were cetuximab-related
13
Progression-free survival time (months)
CRYSTAL trial: Primary endpoint PFS met ITT population independent review 1.0 FOLFIRI, n=599 Cetuximab + FOLFIRI, n=599 0.8 0.9 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 HR = 0.851; 95% CI = [ ] Stratified log-rank p-value = 8.9 mo PFS estimate 1-year PFS rate 23% vs 34% 8.0 mo 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Subjects at risk FOLFIRI alone 599 492 402 293 178 83 35 16 7 4 1 Cetuximab + FOLFIRI 499 392 298 196 103 58 29 12 5 Progression-free survival time (months)
14
CRYSTAL trial: Independent assessment of response
FOLFIRI % Cetuximab + FOLFIRI CR PR SD PD 0.3 38.4 46.7 9.0 0.5 46.4 37.4 8.8 ORR 95%CI 38.7 [ ] 46.9 [ ] DCR** 85.5 84.3 p-value* = *Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test ** DCR: disease control rate
15
CRYSTAL trial: Surgery with curative intent
FOLFIRI alone Cetuximab + FOLFIRI ITT population (pre-planned) Liver metastases only population (exploratory) 4.5 9.8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Percentage (%) n=134 / n=122 No residual tumor in patients with liver metastases p=0.0034* odds ratio 3.0 [95% CI: ] n=599 / group n=599 / group *CMH test
16
Progression-free survival time (months)
CRYSTAL trial: Primary endpoint PFS subgroup: liver metastases only 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Cetuximab + FOLFIRI, n=122 FOLFIRI, n=134 HR = 0.637; 95% CI = [ ] Stratified log-rank p-value = 0.023 11.4 mo PFS estimate 9.2 mo 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Subjects at risk Progression-free survival time (months) FOLFIRI alone 134 115 93 68 36 18 6 3 7 4 1 Cetuximab + FOLFIRI 122 100 84 74 51 26 15 6 2 1 1
17
CRYSTAL trial: PFS time subgroup analyses
HR [95% CI] All ITT subjects (n=1198) 0.851 [ ] Subgroup (number of patients) Age < 65 years (n=751) 0.775 [ ] ≥ 65 years (n=446) 0.989 [ ] ECOG Performance Status 0,1 (n=1156) 0.839 [ ] 2 (n=42) 1.187 [ ] Involved disease sites ≤ 2 (n=1016) 0.862 [ ] > 2 (n=166) 0.794 [ ] Liver metastases only Yes (n=256) 0.637 [ ] No (n=942) 0.913 [ ] Prior adjuvant therapy Yes (n=243) 0.816 [ ] No (n=955) 0.858 [ ] Leucocytes > 10000/mm3 (n=214) 0.765 [ ] See Lewis et al. BMJ Jun 16;322(7300): PubMed-ID: ≤ 10000/mm3 (n=943) 0.874 [ ] Alkaline Phosphatase ≥ 300 U/L (n=151) 0.819 [ ] < 300 U/L (n=986) 0.836 [ ] LDH > UNL (n=540) 0.790 [ ] ≤ UNL (n=516) 0.956 [ ] 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 Favors Cetuximab+FOLFIRI Favors FOLFIRI
18
Progression-free survival time (months)
CRYSTAL trial: Subgroup analysis of PFS time by on-study skin reactions: cetuximab + FOLFIRI Skin reaction grade 0 or 1, n=244 *There were no grade 4 skin reactions 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 Progression-free survival time (months) 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 PFS estimate Skin reaction grade 2, n=243 Skin reaction grade 3*, n=112 11.3 mo 5.4 mo 9.4 mo
19
CRYSTAL trial: Treatment exposure
5-FU Irinotecan Cetuximab FOLFIRI alone n=602 Cetuximab + FOLFIRI n=600 FOLFIRI alone Median duration of treatment, weeks 25.4 26.0 25.6 25.0 Median number of infusions [range] 12 [0 - 47] [0 - 41] [1 - 47] 24 [1 - 88] Relative dose intensity ≥ 80%,% 92 88 78 74 81 Dose reduction ≥ 1 level, % 10 20 25 11 Dose delay ≥ 9 days, % 56 58 55 51
20
CRYSTAL trial: Conclusions (1)
The CRYSTAL trial met its primary objective of demonstrating that the addition of cetuximab to FOLFIRI in the first-line treatment of EGFR-detectable mCRC significantly increased PFS There was a 15% risk reduction for progression in patients treated with cetuximab plus FOLFIRI compared to FOLFIRI
21
CRYSTAL trial: Conclusions (2)
The addition of cetuximab to FOLFIRI was associated with: Higher response rates (p=0.0038) Threefold higher R0 resection rates for initially unresectable disease (p=0.0034) Patients with liver metastases as the only disease site achieved a longer PFS than the whole population Skin reactions showed a strong correlation with efficacy
22
CRYSTAL trial: Conclusions (3)
Treatment was generally well-tolerated Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were similar in both groups Grade 3/4 diarrhea was more frequent with the combination Skin toxicity was in the expected range All cause mortality 60-days-after-treatment-start and 30-days-after-treatment-stop was similar in both groups No cetuximab-related deaths
23
CRYSTAL trial: Conclusions (4)
Survival follow-up, QoL and molecular marker evaluation is ongoing
24
CRYSTAL trial: Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank: The patients The investigators, co-investigators and study teams at the 201 centers in 32 countries involved in this study The study team at Merck KGaA
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.