1. SHARE: A Public Good to Increase Scholarly Innovation
Jeffrey Spies
COS | SHARE | UVA Y
@jeffspies
Presented at UC CoUL, 2017/07/19

2. Efficiency, quality, inclusivity, diversity

3. Mission Increase openness, integrity, and reproducibility of scholarly research.
Efficiency, quality, inclusivity, diversity

4. …in service of increased research efficiency, quality, inclusivity, and diversity.
Efficiency, quality, inclusivity, diversity

5. Mission To maximize research impact by making research widely accessible, discoverable, and reusable.
Efficiency, quality, inclusivity, diversity

6. How SHARE is building a free, open dataset of research activity across the research workflow.
Efficiency, quality, inclusivity, diversity

7. How …by gathering, cleaning, linking, and enhancing scholarly metadata.
Efficiency, quality, inclusivity, diversity

8. Providers
Gather
API
Consumers

9. Current stats 31. 9M across 151 sources. E. g. , 16. 8M articles, 2
Current stats 31.9M across 151 sources. E.g., 16.8M articles, 2.0M preprints, 1.3M datasets, 18.4k software packages
Efficiency, quality, inclusivity, diversity

10. Publish Report Search / Discovery Develop Idea Design Study
Collect Data
Store Data
Analyze Data
Write Report
Try to append
Low quality-not going to happen at all
There’s integration costs,
Learning costs,
Transition costs

11. If we seek to facilitate reproducibility, replicability, extension, and reuse…

12. We need to move beyond description of outcomes to description of process or, better, sharing actual process.

13. OSF organizes and shares research workflow.
Publish Report
Search / Discovery
Develop Idea
Design Study
Collect Data
Store Data
Analyze Data
Write Report
OSF organizes and shares research workflow.
SHARE describes it.

14. Public goods foster innovation.
Efficiency, quality, inclusivity, diversity

16.
Aggregator: 5 non-COS sites

21. Expanding the model Preprint + Peer Review = Journal Journals not as gatekeepers, but as evaluators and amplifiers
Preprints decouple publication and evaluation allowing for the rapid dissemination of content.

22. Aside I’m looking forward to working with Brian and Ginny on Red OA.
Efficiency, quality, inclusivity, diversity

23. Scaling Our Services We can’t be active in every community
Scaling Our Services We can’t be active in every community. That’s not scalable.

24. Scaling Our Services But we can support members within those communities--that know them and speak their language.

26. <share-search /> </menu> <share>
<providers-facet />
<types-facet />
<authors-facet />
<subjects-facet />
</share>
This is about what writing a new frontend against the OSF will look like. Maybe curley braces rather than angle brackets.

29. Scaling between and within communities
Efficiency, quality, inclusivity, diversity

30. Service learning Balances instruction with a pragmatic, real-life opportunity to serve in the community.

31. The Pedagogy Learning how to learn via big, meaningful, real-world projects in a supportive environment that fosters independence and ownership.
112 student interns

32. Increasing our reach via focus with a stakeholder model
Increasing our reach via focus with a stakeholder model. -or- If you build it, they will not necessarily come.
Efficiency, quality, inclusivity, diversity

34. UCSD came to COS with plans to
Design a schema
Build a database
Run a database server
Create a web app
Run a web app server
Design a front-end
Collect and curate data from around campus

35. UCSD left COS with a plan to
Design a schema
Build a database
Run a database server
Create a web app
Run a web app server
Design a front-end
Collect and curate data from around campus

36. A good deal for both groups
We can’t build a UCSD dashboard without UCSD data
That data needed to be curated
They are curation experts
They know their community
We received
Feedback on dashboard design
Insight into curation workflow
A dedicated partner

37. It’s not just about metrics
These are stories we can tell about our campuses. And it’s not just about productivity. It’s about diversity, growth, and change.

38. In my opinion The use of institutional identifiers is the most important task that the metadata community can take up.

39. SHARE: A Public Good to Increase Scholarly Innovation
Find this presentation at
_mit_spies.pptx
SHARE: A Public Good to Increase Scholarly Innovation
Jeffrey Spies
@jeffspies