1. LSSIP Year 2011 KOM ESSIP Plan Edition 2011
20-21 September 2011

2. Alignment with ATM MP (I)
LSSIP
Alignment with ATM MP (I)
European ATM Master Plan
Level 1
Executive
view
Level 2
Planning view
OI Steps (80 in IP1)
Deployment view
ESSIP Plan and ESSIP Report
Level 3
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

3. Alignment with ATM MP (II)
LSSIP
11/06/2018
Alignment with ATM MP (II)
Following the request of many members of the SJU (SCG/15),
SJU launched alignment of ESSIP with the 2nd layer of European ATM Master Plan as part of SWP C.02:
“Performance, Deployment, Financial Incentives Planning and Reporting.”
Result: C.02–IP1-ESSIP Alignment
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM
Enter here your Presentation Title 3

4. Alignment with ATM MP (III)
For ESSIP Plan ed. 2011
New way of working relying on WPC participants to provide technical contents.
Outline Descriptions developed to investigate new detailed ESSIP Implementation Objectives and SLoAs to be included in the ESSIP Plan edition 2011.
Some legacy ESSIP objectives do not relate to OI steps. To be kept until their achievement.
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

5. Alignment with ATM MP (IV)
The European Deployment Plan
How to translate OIs Steps / Systems Enablers into planned implementation activities for each group of stakeholders??
ESSIP Implementation
Objectives
OI Steps
Systems enablers
Translation of OI Steps
/ Systems Enablers
into Planned Activities
ESSIP Toolkit
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

6. Alignment with ATM MP (V)
Approach
Phased-approach to translate OI Steps / Systems enablers into Implementation Objectives
Step 1: Deployment Analysis of OI Step / System enablers
1a/ Description Sheet :
Comprehensive picture of the network evolution to achieve OI Steps / System Enablers by providing detailed information in respect of WHAT to implement
(1b/ Deployment Conditions Sheet)
(when, where, transitions, exemptions, etc…)
Step 2: Identification of Implementation Objectives to cover OI Steps / Systems Enablers
Step 3: Details of Implementation Objectives
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

7. Example: extract from Description Form for OI step AOM-0202
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

8. Example: extract from ESSIP objective AOM19
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

9. Results of SESAR WP C2 Early Task
LSSIP
11/06/2018
Alignment with ATM MP (VIII)
Results of SESAR WP C2 Early Task
Objective: full coverage and alignement between level 2 and level 3 (ESSIP) of the ATM Master Plan for IP1
33 OI steps fully covered by existing ESSIP
5 OI steps partially covered by existing ESSIP  2 Outline Descriptions
8 OI steps without associated ESSIP  8 Outline Descriptions
22 OI steps for which no ESSIP required
12 OI steps – Enablers are with insufficient information
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM
Enter here your Presentation Title 9

10. Alignment with ATM MP (X)
LSSIP
Alignment with ATM MP (X)
ESSIP Plan Edition 2011:
39 fully covered by ESSIP Plan Edition 2011 objectives = mature enough + requiring coordinated planning
10 SES
23 SESAR
16 ‘ECIP’
Feb 2011 – deployment analysis of 80 OI Steps + further update:
4 with Outline Descr.
37 remaining ones
ESSIP Plan Edition 2011: full analysis performed through deployment analysis of WP C2 early task //
SO SITUATION IS AS FOLLOWS 39
//CLICK 4 37
AND THIS GIVES US THE NEW ESSIP Plan
//NEXT SLIDE
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

11. Alignment with ATM MP (XI)
Next Steps / Next Cycle
1st Master Plan Update (expected for 03/2012)
Changes to OI steps and (System) Enablers, based on recommendations from Deployment analysis for ESSIP Plan ed. 2011
Deployment scenario
“Deployment scenarios … Once they are proposed as the preferred scenario for implementation they should be accompanied (if necessary) by a proposal for financial incentives and a proposal for regulation. Both are subject to decisions outside the SESAR context. While these decisions are prepared and taken, the preferred and selected scenario is developed into implementation objectives. Once the decision on financial incentives and regulation is taken, the implementation objective then becomes part of the ESSIP” (C.02-D01 - Process for Performance/Deployment Planning, Financial Incentives and Reporting Ed )
Gap-analysis
Same as for ESSIP Plan ed. 2011
Proposals for new / revised objectives
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

12. ESSIP Plan Edition 2011- Now part of WPC.2
EUROCONTROL does not develop any more ESSIP objectives in isolation through its working arrangements/teams.
The ESSIP plan is now Official deliverable of SESAR JU
EUROCONTROL is Task Leader (T-2.3 in WP C.02)
7 contributors (AIRBUS, ALENIA, DFS, ENAV, NATS, SEAC, THALES,)
1 reviewer (INDRA)
WPC.02 Partners provide:
Technical input in developing Outline descriptions
Technical feed-back in developing an ESSIP objective
Technical feed-back in drafting an ESSIP Plan Document
Review of ESSIP Plan Document
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

13. ESSIP Plan Edition 2011 significant changes endorsed by the PC
INF01 -> Achieved
HUM04 -> Overtaken by new ATCO Reg.
HUM05 -> Will be overtaken by EASA Reg.
NAV06 -> Overtaken by SESAR WP15.3
DELETE
Removed /
Achieved
OUT
AOP09 - Dependent Parallel Operations
ATC15 - En-route Support for AMAN
ATC16 - ACASII
COM11 - Voice Over IP
Introduce
item
CREATE
NEW
New ARN Version
NEW
AOM20
OUT
AOM18
Alignment with
Regulation
NEW
ITY-ADQ
OUT
INF05
ADAPT
New SLoAs: AOP05 (ASP06, USE05), ENV02 (APO02), ITY-AGVCS (ASP05)
Scope ECAC: ATC12, HUM02.1, HUM03.1
Dates aligned with ATM MP: AOP04.2, ATC02.2, ATC12
Dates aligned with amended Reg.: ITY-FMTP
Alignment
with ATM MP
& SES Regulations
CHANGES
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

14. ESSIP Plan Edition 2011 significant changes endorsed by the PC
INF01 -> Achieved
HUM04 -> Overtaken by new ATCO Reg.
HUM05 -> Will be overtaken by EASA Reg.
NAV06 -> Overtaken by SESAR WP15.3
DELETE
Removed /
Achieved
OUT
AOP09 - Dependent Parallel Operations
ATC15 - En-route Support for AMAN
ATC16 - ACASII
COM11 - Voice Over IP
Introduce
item
CREATE
NEW
New ARN Version
NEW
AOM20
OUT
AOM18
Alignment with
Regulation
NEW
ITY-ADQ
OUT
INF05
ESSIP  49 Active
ESSIP Edition 2011  49 Active
Only xx applicable to <State>
ADAPT
New SLoAs: AOP05 (ASP06, USE05), ENV02 (APO02), ITY-AGVCS (ASP05)
Scope ECAC: ATC12, HUM02.1, HUM03.1
Dates aligned with ATM MP: AOP04.2, ATC02.2, ATC12
Dates aligned with amended Reg.: ITY-FMTP
Alignment
with ATM MP
& SES Regulations
CHANGES
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

15. ESSIP Edition 2011 OBJECTIVES
Related to EC IR
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

16. ESSIP Plan Edition 2011 changes: Impact on <State>
AOP09 - Dependent Parallel Operations
ATC15 - En-route Support for AMAN
ATC16 - ACASII
COM11 - Voice Over IP
<State> to decide applicability
CREATE
NEW
Objectives are ‘ECAC’, so applicable to <State>
NEW
AOM20 - ARN V7
Objective is EU+ so applicable to <State>
NEW
ITY-ADQ
AOP05: New SLoAs (ASP06, USE05)
ENV02: New SLoA (APO02)
ITY-AGVCS: New SLoA (ASP05)
ATC12: Scope ECAC
HUM02.1: Scope ECAC
HUM03.1 Scope ECAC
AOP04.2: Dates aligned with ATM MP
ATC02.2: Dates aligned with ATM MP
ATC12: Dates aligned with ATM MP
ITY-FMTP: Dates aligned with amended Reg.
xxx
ADAPT
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

17. New Objectives: AOM20 – ARN Version 7
FOC: 10/2013; Stakeholders: ASP, MIL
The objective replaces former AOM 18
Area of applicability: ECAC States
Link to ATM MP: [AOM-0203], [AOM-0205], [AOM-0401], [AOM-0402], [AOM-0504], [AOM-0801], [AOM-0802], [DCB-0203], [DCB-0204], [SDM-0101], [SDM-0103]
Implement ARN Version 7:
as a response to the Airspace Action Plan and the 2015 Airspace Concept and Strategy for the ECAC States;
in accordance with Advanced Airspace Scheme (AAS) principles taking into account military requirements;
will consolidate into a network approach the first FAB developments, Free Route Airspace implementation, and Terminal Airspace System developments;
will ensure the delivery of the airspace structure elements of IP1.
Managed as usual through RNDSG
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

18. New Objectives: AOP09 – Optimised Dependent Parallel Operations
FOC: 12/2015; Stakeholders: REG, ASP
Applicability: To be determined locally. Potentially applicable to airports with simultaneous operations on closely spaced parallel or near-parallel instrument runway.
Link to ATM MP: [AO-0403]-Optimised Dependent Parallel Operations
Implement optimised dependant parallel operations aiming at:
increasing utilisation of the parallel runway operations;
reducing dependencies between the runways with more accurate surveillance techniques and controller tools as well as associated procedures; and
obtaining capacity gains.
Applicability to <State> to be discussed
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

19. New Objectives: ATC15 – Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations
FOC: 01/2017; Stakeholders: REG, ASP
Applicability: In ECAC airspace, for selected En-Route environments (ACCs) interfacing with AMAN systems and operations.
Link to ATM MP: [TS-0305]-Arrival Management Extended to En Route Airspace
Implement objective by:
Implementing the necessary functionality and information exchanges in ATC systems to support the use of AMAN information in En-Route sectors from adjacent/subjacent TMAs;
Implementing ATC procedures in En-Route airspace/sectors to support the use of AMAN information in En-Route sectors interfacing with ad/subjacent TMAs.
Applicability to <State> to be discussed
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

20. New Objectives: ATC16 – ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1
FOC: 01/2015; Stakeholders: REG, ASP, MIL
Applicability: ECAC states.
Link to ATM MP: Enabler - [CTE-S11a]-Upgrades to TCAS, TAWS etc
Enhance TCAS in compliance with TCAS II Version 7.1:
Mandatory for forward fit from ;
Mandatory for retrofit from ;
Applicable to all flights performed by airframes of a given category, regardless of State of Registry:
with MTOW > 5700 kg, or
authorised to carry more than 19 passengers; or
any other aeroplane equipped with ACAS II.
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

21. New Objectives: COM11 – Voice over Internet Protocol (IP)
FOC: 12/2020; Stakeholders: REG, ASP, MIL
Applicability: ECAC states.
Link to ATM MP: Enablers - [CTE-C8]; [CTE-C9]
Implement Voice over IP:
Covering inter centre (encompassing all type of ATM Units) voice communication and the links with the ground radio stations.
Considering that a number of Telecom Service Providers are planning to phase out analogue and digital 64k circuits that support current analogue and digital ATM voice services.
Retrofit dates: 12/2018 for inter-centre telephony and 12/2020 for links to the ground radio stations.
Forward fit date is 01/2013 for both inter-centre telephony and the links to the ground radio stations.
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

22. New Objectives: ITY-ADQ – Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information
Timescales: Articles 4, 5(1) and 5(2) -> 07/2013; Articles 5(3) and 5(4)(c) -> 07/2014; Fully applicable -> 07/2017
Stakeholders: REG, ASP, MIL, APO
Applicability: EU+ states
Link to SES: Regulation (EU) No 73/2010
Link to ATM MP: OI Steps - [IS-0202]; IS-0203]; [IS-0204]
It applies to the following aeronautical data and aeronautical information:
the integrated aeronautical information package (IAIP), with the exception of AICs;
electronic obstacle and electronic terrain data or elements thereof;
aerodrome mapping data.
It applies to systems, their constituents and associated procedures involved in the origination, production, storage, handling, processing, transfer and distribution of any of the above.
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

23. Objectives with potential FAB dimension
List to be discussed and agreed at FAB level but, initially:
AOM13.1, AOM19, AOM20
ATC02.2, ATC02.5, ATC02.6, ATC02.7, ATC12; ATC15
COM06, COM09, COM10, COM11
FCM01, FCM03
ITY-ADQ, ITY-AGDL, ITY-AGVCS, ITY-FMTP, ITY-COTR
SUR02, SUR04, SUR05
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

24. Airport-related objectives - Applicability
The only reference for the applicability area of airport-related objectives, is contained in the list of airports included in the Table 8 of ESSIP 2011 Part IV, Annex B;
This list of airports is built on the basis of the initial list of 57 Airports identified as potentially having an impact on network operations by SCG/14 and aligned to IP1 deployment criteria for airports;
The list is/will be updated/agreed every year based on the feedback by the states which may require to drop any airports (i.e. Salzburg, Innsbruck, Southampton) from the initial list; In addition, states may add additional airports on voluntary basis to the list covering all (Bristol, Newcastle) or only a limited number (Antwerp, Charleroi, etc) of objectives.
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

25. Key Definitions - Reminder
> TYPE
SES – SESAR – ECIP
> STATUS
Draft - Active - Achieved – Removed
(LSSIP reporting only for Active)
SCOPE
SES and SESAR: ECAC, Multi-National (MN), EU+, Airport
ECIP: Pan European (PE), MN, Harmonisation (H)
(See ESSIP Plan « Key definitions for ESSIP objectives descriptions» p 19-24)
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

26. ESSIP Plan Information EIPR Coordinators additional guidance
Detailed Information
Details on all objectives to be found in the ESSIP Plan - Edition
Additional guidance produced by EIPR objective coordinators available through the LSSIP Database:
ESSIP Plan Information
EIPR Coordinators additional guidance
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

27. ESSIP on the web @ http://www.eurocontrol.int/essip
Also on the ESSIP website:
Mapping with European ATM Master Plan and SES legislation
How to join the applicability area of an ESSIP Objective
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

28. Corrigendum ESSIP plan – Edition 2011
Each file any possible issue in the corrigendum e.g mistakes, a question, a proposal to simplify, etc.
Send your proposals to the CP
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

29. Corrigendum ESSIP plan – Edition 2011
Each fills in columns X/Y/Z.
The EIPR Objective Coordinator regularly checks 'his' Objectives with the AutoFilter one can easily spot his/her name) and puts proposal in column AA.
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

30. Defining top 5-10 ESSIP objectives for each State
Why?
Focusing the ESSIP Report for 2011 on most important issues for the States (all objectives will be represented in the Annexes but only the prioritized ones in body)
Complete restructuring of the ESSIP Report for 2011
Efficient use of resources
The idea has been presented to SESAR WP C-2 partners and accepted
How?
The request will be sent to each State FP
Follow up during the kick-off meeting
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

31. Defining top 5-10 ESSIP objectives for each State
The Question: Depending on your local situation, what are the most beneficial (priority) ESSIP objectives (chose 5-10) for implementation in your State and how do they contribute to key performance areas listed in the table below? Use the following scale to assess the contribution to respective KPA: ++ high positive impact positive impact no impact negative impact
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM

32. Questions?
ESSIP Plan - LSSIP Year 2011 KoM