Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBeatrix Stafford Modified over 6 years ago
1
Quality inspection with LIBS for grey & red bathes
Sub task 3.1.3: Quality inspection with LIBS for grey & red bathes , Orleans, France Lead partner: PhD student: Han XIA Supervisor: Maarten BAKKER Delft University of Technology
2
Outline Achievement of 3rd period: quality control with LIBS (T ) Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) adaptive setup Classification of clean brick, brick with adhered mortar and tile Quantitative analysis of brick contaminated with gypsum / cement paste Economic perspective Cost for a onsite LIBS quality control system Plans for next 6 months Concrete aggregate batch (4 -16 mm) prepared for MEBIN Brick granular fraction (> 500 mm) from VITO, (gypsum & cement) Fragmented brick fraction from BRGM, (input & output) Summary
3
Overview of WP3: quality control with LIBS
4
Adaptive LIBS setup LIBS: adaptive optics design for brick and concrete aggregate quality inspection Conveyor belt speed: 350 mm/s (To scale up 20 times) Sampling rate: 100 Hz Working distance: 200 mm Surface roughness: ± 20 mm
5
Achievement during 3rd period: brick fraction
GAIK BRGM VITO TUD quality data Clean red brick: 15 kg Brick + adhered mortar: 3 kg Tile: 10 kg Classification model done. 13
6
Brick with adhered mortar
Materials from GAIKER Clean brick Brick with adhered mortar Tile
7
Classification model
8
Achievement during 3rd period: brick fraction
GAIK BRGM VITO TUD quality data LIBS quantitative analysis on Self-prepared powdered brick + gypsum / mortar (1-10 wt%, < 250 mm) done. 13
9
Emission line selection for quantitative analysis
10
Univariate calibration curves
Direct LIBS measurement on powder without any sample preparation
11
Achievement during 3rd period: concrete aggregate
STRUK/TUD MEBIN quality data TUD 150 Kg Recycled CA (4-16 mm): Characterization of inherent contamination level by hand-picking ready for LIBS test 12
12
LIBS methods: classification & quantification
Categorizing new contaminants Demolition concrete (500 Kg) -> Concrete aggregate (150 Kg) -> Sink-float (contamination level) In process Database of classified contaminants
13
Cost for onsite LIBS quality control system [€]:
Economic perspective Cost for onsite LIBS quality control system [€]: Laser unit: Spectrometer: 5.000 Optics: Software:
14
Plans for the next 6 months: brick fraction
GAIK clean brick ~3 kg adhered brick ~3 kg BRGM VITO clean brick ~3 kg adhered brick ~3 kg Brick + gypsum / mortar (> 500 mm) & Mech. Str. data TUD Clean red brick: 15 kg Brick + adhered mortar: 3 kg Tile: 10 kg Classification model done. LIBS quantitative analysis on self-made powdered bricks + gypsum/mortar (1-10 wt%) done. 13
15
Plans for the next 6 months: concrete aggregate
STRUK/TUD MEBIN TUD quality data 150 Kg recycled CA (4-16 mm): Characterization of inherent contamination level by hand-picking ready for LIBS test Delivery to MEBIN after LIBS test by the end of Feb. 2016 12
16
Summary LIBS adaptive setup: working distance vs. sensitivity
Brick fraction (samples from GAIKER, for VITO) & concrete aggregate for MEBIN Wavelength range selections: Vis. for classification, NIR for quantitative analysis Feeding may be tricky, e.g. for tile Cost: varying cost, e.g. feeding & transport, personnel and other maintenance
17
Thank you very much for your attention! Questions? Remarks?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.