Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJocelyn Henderson Modified over 6 years ago
1
Ultra Wideband UK Test Results Presented by John Mettrop UK CAA
(Press)
2
What is Ultra WideBand? Short Duration Pulse
Occupies significant Bandwidth (Normally >500MHz) High Instantaneous Power Low average Power Flux Density Intended to Operate Below Noise Floor
3
Ultra Wideband Applications (1)
Communications 3.1 – 10.6 GHz Range <30 Metres Bandwidth 480 MBits/Sec Replacement of USB, Video Streaming Ground/Wall Penetrating Radar < 3 GHz Range <2 cm to contact face Road/Runway/Wall Assessment Licensed and Co-ordinated
4
Ultra Wideband Applications (2)
Building Material Analysis < 4 GHz Range <1 Metre through Wall Location of Pipes/Cables/ Imperfections Intended to Be Unlicensed
5
Theoretical Studies ITU ECC TG1/8 Established in 2002
Completed it’s work in 2005 Produce 1 report and 4 Recommendations ECC PT 3 Report 64 ECC Decision Further Consultation on PFD Limits 3.1 – 4.4 GHz On-going Work on GPR/WPR/BMA Due to Complete June 2006
6
Practical Testing in the UK
7
Aggregate Effects? Decreasing antenna gain UWB Devices ~300m
Radar Antenna 4° 2° Sidelobes Azimuth beamwidth ~2 to 4 degrees
8
Antenna Elevation Difference in antenna gain < 1dB One storey Two
building Two storey building Handheld External? Shielding Glass 0 dB Brick ~10 dB dB
9
Antenna Elevation Difference in antenna gain < 1dB
More important is number of devices rather than height e.g. departure lounge. Eastleigh? Shielding Glass 0 dB Brick ~10 dB dB
10
I/N versus UWB EIRP Radar IF Filter Response
Single UWB spike e.g. 50 MHz PRF Multiple UWB spikes e.g. 1.5 MHz PRF Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
11
1.5 MHz Undithered, 1 MHz bandwidth
Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
12
Dithered UWB Undithered Dithered
Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
13
Dithered UWB Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
14
OFDM UWB 1 MHz measurement bandwidth Bandwidth correction factor
channel width 1 MHz measurement bandwidth Bandwidth correction factor for noise-like signals: C = 10log10(BW ratio) C = 10log10(5) = 7 dB BW Ratio = Radar IF BW/1 MHz Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
15
Effect of Radar Processing on Interference Type
Radar return pulse 20 dB 20 dB 50 MHz undithered spike Frequency 20 dB Radar return pulse 30 dB OFDM Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
16
False Targets: Early Warning Mode
Targets start at 40 nm Target spacing 2.5 nm Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
17
Determining Pd: 100% 5 targets, no interference
Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
18
Determining Pd: 80% 4 targets
Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
19
Determining Pd: 60% 3 targets
Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
20
Determining Pd: 40% 2 targets
Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
21
Determining Pd: 3 faint targets
1 2 3 Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
22
Pd vs EIRP: Radar B Uncorrected
Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
23
Pd vs EIRP: Radar A Uncorrected
Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
24
Correcting for wrong Pd
Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
25
Correcting for wrong Pd
Measured at 90% +9.6 dB Perform correction Curve Fit Model for 90% dB At 50% point Model Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
26
Pd vs EIRP: Radar B Corrected
-90 dBm/MHz at 358m -70 dBm/MHz at 358m -56 dBm/MHz at 358m ~20 dB Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
27
Pd vs EIRP: Radar A Corrected
-53 dBm/MHz at 358m -84 dBm/MHz at 358m ~30 dB Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
28
Distance correction Antenna near field effects ~ 100m?
First Fresnel Zone At 3 GHz > 2 km Field strength ITU Propagation Models 20 Log D1/D2 40 Log D1/D2 Distance Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
29
UWB Allowable Field strength vs Distance
30
UWB Allowable Field strength vs Distance
31
I/N versus EIRP: UWB to Radar B
Shows how decreasing PRF or dithering can increase the I/N for a 20 MHz bandwidth
32
Propagation: Onset of UWB interference
33
Key factors Setting of targets to 90% Pd
Determining when a target is visible IF measurement bandwidth Location of IF measurement in radar chain
34
Faulty Baby Alarms Purpose Potentially Affect Services
Monitoring baby activity during sleep Potentially Affect Services VHF Communications Documented Cases of Interference Numerous in the UK Solution Supply replacement unit Studies None
35
Industrial/Scientific/Medical 5th Harmonic of 27 MHz
Purpose Various including RF drying ovens for biscuits etc Potentially Affect Services VHF Communications Documented Cases of Interference Numerous within the UK Solution Retune centre frequency of the RF unit Better RF Shielding Studies None
36
Cable TV Purpose Potentially Affect Services
Provision of television and internet services Potentially Affect Services ILS, VOR, VHF Communications Documented Cases of Interference Numerous in Germany and Belgium Initial Problems in the UK Solution Improved termination of cables Frequency avoidance Studies ECC Report 24 May 2003
37
Wireless Cameras Purpose Potentially Affect Services
Wireless CCTV cameras Potentially Affect Services DME, SSR, GNSS Documented Cases of Interference See WG F Working Paper 9 Solution Confiscation Prosecution Studies None
38
GSM On-board Aircraft Purpose Potential Impact Studies
Provide mobile phone communications in flight Potential Impact Interference to Aircraft Systems Passenger Behaviour (Air Rage) Interference to Ground Non-Aeronautical Services Studies RTCA 202 (on-going) Eurocae WG58 (on-going) CEPT SE 7 Technical Report (on-going)
39
Windfarms 1 Purpose Potentially Affect Services
Renewable Energy Provision Potentially Affect Services Radar (ILS, MLS, VHF Communications) Documented Cases of Interference See next slide Solution Objection to Development Studies None published Work on-going
40
Windfarms 2
41
Questions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.