Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Feedforward runs N. Blaskovic N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting.

Published bySabina Stephany Baldwin Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Feedforward runs N. Blaskovic N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting."— Presentation transcript:

1 Feedforward runs N. Blaskovic N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

2 Introduction Mikey showed on 8th Feb that most feed-forward runs show jitter reduction: N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

3 Introduction However, the extent of jitter reduction varies greatly between runs. Today’s presentation concentrates on two issues that can limit feedforward correction: Insufficient gain DAC outputs beyond amplifier’s linear range This study makes use of plots of kick to bunch 2 vs. position of bunch 1 at IPB (charge normalised), as shown on slide 4. N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

4 Bunch 1 upstream-downstream position correlation
Example Bunch 1 upstream-downstream position correlation Ratio of calculated kick to kick that should have been applied Whether DAC outputs are within the kicker amplifier’s linear range Negative gradient: ‘correcting towards 0’ N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

5 Overview Overview 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 This presentation will assess one feedforward run per slide as follows: Assessment will be based on DAC output and gain level only, not on the level of correction achieved. ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 OK ffRun8 ffRun9 Saturating kicker amplifier / insufficient gain Wrong gain sign 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

6 Criteria Saturating kicker amplifier criterion:
Runs where most triggers have an IPK DAC output outside the range to 1200 counts Insufficient gain criterion: Runs where gradient of IPK kick to bunch 2 at IPB vs. bunch 1 position at IPB is 0 to -0.5 Wrong gain sign criterion: Runs where gradient of IPK kick to bunch 2 at IPB vs. bunch 1 position at IPB is positive N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

7 Overview ffRun1 Gain P2-IPK: Gain P3-IPK: 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Insufficient gain! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

8 Overview ffRun3 Gain P2-IPK: Gain P3-IPK: 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 OK! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

9 Overview ffRun4 Gain P2-IPK: Gain P3-IPK: 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Insufficient gain! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

10 Overview ffRun5 Gain P2-IPK: Gain P3-IPK: 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 OK! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

11 Overview ffRun6 Gain P2-IPK: Gain P3-IPK: 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Wrong gain sign! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

12 Overview ffRun7 Gain P2-IPK: Gain P3-IPK: 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 OK! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

13 Overview ffRun8 Gain P2-IPK: Gain P3-IPK: 0 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 OK! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

14 Overview ffRun9 Gain P2-IPK: Gain P3-IPK: 0 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Insufficient gain! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

15 Overview ffRun1 Gain P2-IPK: ? Gain P3-IPK: ? 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Insufficient gain! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

16 Saturating kicker amplifier & insufficient gain!
Overview ffRun2 Gain P2-IPK: Gain P3-IPK: 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Saturating kicker amplifier & insufficient gain! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

17 Saturating kicker amplifier!
Overview ffRun3 Gain P2-IPK: Gain P3-IPK: 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Saturating kicker amplifier! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

18 Saturating kicker amplifier & insufficient gain!
Overview ffRun5 Gain P2-IPK: Gain P3-IPK: 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Saturating kicker amplifier & insufficient gain! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

19 Saturating kicker amplifier & insufficient gain!
Overview ffRun6 Gain P2-IPK: Gain P3-IPK: 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Saturating kicker amplifier & insufficient gain! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

20 Overview ffRun7 Gain P2-IPK: Gain P3-IPK: 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Insufficient gain! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

21 Overview ffRun8 Gain P2-IPK: Gain P3-IPK: 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun9 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun8 Wrong gain sign! N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

22 Summary On next slide, summary of how insufficient gain and/or saturating kicker amplifier is related to extent of feedback correction. As done by Mikey, ‘Improvement’ is given by: ‘’ ′Improvement ′ = Jitter FfOn B2 − Jitter FfOff B2 Jitter FfOff B2 where B2 is bunch 2 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

23 30th Jan -7 % -29 % -12 % -28 % 60 % -15 % -4 % -9 % -13 % -16 % -6 % -5 % 61 % ‘Improvement’ -39 % -24 % -22 % -42 % -20 % -10 % -11 % -2 % -8 % -17 % 59 % 43 % 30th Jan ffRun1 ffRun1 ffRun3 ffRun3 ffRun4 ffRun4 ffRun5 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun8 ffRun9 ffRun9 Mikey’s results from 8th Feb Today’s results 1st Feb 1st Feb ffRun1 ffRun1 ffRun2 ffRun2 ffRun3 ffRun3 ffRun5 ffRun5 ffRun6 ffRun6 ffRun7 ffRun7 ffRun8 ffRun8 Feedforward reduces jitter Gain OK & DAC out OK Feedforward increases jitter Low gain / saturating amplifier Wrong gain sign N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

24 Conclusions Some of the underperforming feedforward runs seem to be limited by: Insufficient kicks due to diluted gains or incorrect sign of one of the gains Operating beyond the kicker amplifier’s linear range Ensure that average DAC out is centred at zero counts on shift. N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

25 Appendix Summary of the four feedforward runs deemed to have OK gain and OK DAC out N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

26 Summary of OK! runs 30th Jan 30th Jan 30th Jan 30th Jan ffRun3 ffRun5
N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

27 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

28 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

29 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

30 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

31 Appendix Analysis concerns N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

32 Possible analysis improvements
Reconsider double 3σ flier removal on position. Calculate the jitter from a Gaussian fit, as opposed to just finding the std of the data. Try Young-Im’s calibration, using reference cavity for charge normalisation. N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

33 Apparent extraneous orbit
Trigger 267 from fbRun1 on has normal charge upstream and at IP and yet has a strange response at IPB: trigger 267 trigger 267 N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting

Download ppt "Feedforward runs N. Blaskovic N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting."

Similar presentations

ATF2: Status Update Glenn Christian (on behalf of FONT group) 10 th ATF Project Meeting.

ATF2: Status Update Glenn Christian (on behalf of FONT group) 10 th ATF Project Meeting.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 Preliminary resolution study results N. Blaskovic.

N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 Preliminary resolution study results N. Blaskovic.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 November 2013 week 2 FONT shift summary N. Blaskovic.

N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 November 2013 week 2 FONT shift summary N. Blaskovic.
FONT Meeting1 Calibrations over IP LO power scan N. Blaskovic.

FONT Meeting1 Calibrations over IP LO power scan N. Blaskovic.
October 12, 2006 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS Undulator Good Field Region and Tuning Strategy 1 Undulator Good Field Region and.

October 12, 2006 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS Undulator Good Field Region and Tuning Strategy 1 Undulator Good Field Region and.
ATF2 FB/FF layout Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 11, 2007.

ATF2 FB/FF layout Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 11, 2007.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.

Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.

Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo 20014.02.04. ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.

ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF February-March 2014 shift plan N. Blaskovic.

N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF February-March 2014 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.

1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
ATF2 Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group 5th ATF2 project meeting, KEK December 19-21, 2007.

ATF2 Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group 5th ATF2 project meeting, KEK December 19-21, 2007.
Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales (FONT) - Review of Feedback Prototype Tests at ATF(KEK) Glenn Christian John Adams Institute, Oxford for FONT collaboration.

Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales (FONT) - Review of Feedback Prototype Tests at ATF(KEK) Glenn Christian John Adams Institute, Oxford for FONT collaboration.
1 FONT Results 2010 Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Glenn Christian Michael Davis, Colin Perry, Javier Resta Lopez John Adams Institute Oxford.

1 FONT Results 2010 Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Glenn Christian Michael Davis, Colin Perry, Javier Resta Lopez John Adams Institute Oxford.
FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF21 FONT digitisation studies of IP BPMs D. Bett, N. Blaskovic, P. Burrows, G. Christian, M. Davis, Y. I. Kim, C. Perry John.

FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF21 FONT digitisation studies of IP BPMs D. Bett, N. Blaskovic, P. Burrows, G. Christian, M. Davis, Y. I. Kim, C. Perry John.
FLC Group Test-beam Studies of the Laser-Wire Detector 13 September 2006 Maximilian Micheler Supervisor: Freddy Poirier.

FLC Group Test-beam Studies of the Laser-Wire Detector 13 September 2006 Maximilian Micheler Supervisor: Freddy Poirier.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.

Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.

AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Robert Apsimon, Philip Burrows, Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Davide Gamba,

Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Robert Apsimon, Philip Burrows, Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Davide Gamba,
Magnet Motion Produces Luminosity Loss. NLC Feedback Operation Kicker Gain Bunch Charge Measure deflected bunches with BPM and kick other beam to eliminate.

Magnet Motion Produces Luminosity Loss. NLC Feedback Operation Kicker Gain Bunch Charge Measure deflected bunches with BPM and kick other beam to eliminate.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google