Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Alternative Evaluation and Choice

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Alternative Evaluation and Choice"— Presentation transcript:

1 Alternative Evaluation and Choice
BABIN / HARRIS CB PART 4 CHAPTER 13 Decision Making II: Alternative Evaluation and Choice ©PETER SAMUELS/THE IMAGE BANK/GETTY IMAGES 1

2 Learning Outcomes LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Understand the difference between evaluative criteria and determinant criteria. Comprehend how value affects the evaluation of alternatives. Explain the importance of product categorization in the evaluation of alternatives process. Distinguish between compensatory and noncompensatory rules that guide consumer choice. LO2 LO3 LO4

3 Exhibit 13.1: Consumer Decision- Making Process
LO1

4 LO1 Understand the difference between evaluative criteria and determinant criteria. 4

5 Evaluative Criteria LO1 The attributes, features, or potential benefits that consumers consider when reviewing possible solutions to a problem.

6 Exhibit 13.2 Product, Feature, and Benefit
LO1

7 Value Equation LO1

8 Determinant Criteria LO1 The evaluative criteria that are related to the actual choice that is made.

9 Example of a Determinant Criterion
LO1 When the MacBook Air was introduced, the product was promoted largely on thinness and portability. © JOHN GREEN/SAN MATEO COUNTY TIMES/MCT/NEWSCOM

10 Comprehend how value affects the evaluation of alternatives.
LO2 Comprehend how value affects the evaluation of alternatives. 10

11 Value and Alternative Evaluation
LO2 Hedonic criteria – emotional, symbolic, and subjective attributes or benefits that are associated with an alternative. Utilitarian criteria – functional or economic aspects associated with an alternative. Bounded rationality – perfectly rational decisions are not always feasible due to constraints found in information processing.

12 Types of Evaluation Processes
LO2 Affect-based evaluation Evaluate products based on the overall feeling that is evoked by the alternative. Attribute-based evaluation Evaluate alternatives across a set of attributes that are considered relevant to the purchase situation.

13 LO3 Explain the importance of product categorization in the evaluation of alternatives process. 13

14 Product Categories LO3 Mental representations of stored knowledge about groups of products. Category levels: Superordinate Subordinate

15 Exhibit 13.4: Superordinate and Subordinate Categorization
LO3

16 Attributes LO3 Perceptual attributes Underlying attributes

17 Signals LO3 A characteristic that allows a consumer to diagnose something distinctive about an alternative Signals include: Brand name Price Appearance Retailer reputation Signals are used when consumers are trying to collect information about quality.

18 Factors Determining Evaluative Criteria Used
LO3 Situational influences Product knowledge Expert opinions Social influences Online sources Marketing communications

19 Green Marketing LO3 Focuses on offering sustainable products to consumers. AP IMAGES/TOM UHLMAN

20 Consumer Judgment LO3 Mental assessments of the presence of attributes and the benefits associated with those attributes. Consumers make judgments about: Presence of features Feature levels Benefits associated with features Value associated with the benefit How objects differ from each other

21 Issues Affecting Consumer Judgments
LO3 Attribute correlation Brand name associations Just noticeable difference Quality perceptions

22 Brand Names and Judgment
LO3 ©MARK YAMAMOTO/NEWSCOM What can a brand name tell you about a product?

23 Exhibit 13.5 Missing Information
LO3

24 LO4 Distinguish between compensatory and noncompensatory rules that guide consumer choice. 24

25 Consumer Choice: Decision Rules
LO4 Compensatory rules Allow consumers to select products that may perform poorly on one attribute by compensating for the poor performance by good performance on another attribute. Noncompensatory rules Strict guidelines are set prior to selection, and any option that does not meet the specifications is eliminated from consideration.

26 Exhibit 13.6: A Compensatory Approach
LO4 The formula [Ao = Σ(bi)(ei)] allows for poor scores on one attribute to be compensated for by good scores on another.

27 Noncompensatory Models
LO4 Conjunctive rule Disjunctive rule Lexicographic rule Elimination-by-aspects rule (EBA)

28 Exhibit 13.7 Noncompensatory Decision Approaches
LO4

29 Retail Outlet Selection
©RICHARD LEVINE/ALAMY Online retailers have to thoroughly describe the evaluative criteria that consumers may use.


Download ppt "Alternative Evaluation and Choice"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google