Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Longer term outcomes & Stop smoking services
See acknowledgement slide at the end for detail on CIs, project team, disclaimer etc.
2
Stop Smoking Service Sites Bristol County Durham and Darlington
Study Team Stop Smoking Service Sites Linda Bauld Fiona Dobbie Rosemary Hiscock Jo Leonardi – Bee Andy McEwen Paul Aveyard Tim Coleman Carol Anne Greenan Leonie Brose Maureen Kennedy Hayden McRobbie Susan Murray Richard Purves Lion Shahab Sarah Simms Advisory group chair: Ann McNeill Bristol County Durham and Darlington Hull and East Riding Leicestershire County and Rutland Oldham Northamptonshire North East and North Lincolnshire Rotherham South East Essex Do you want titles added? Do you want members of the advisory group added also? If alphabetical should Paul appear above Leonie??
3
Acknowledgements This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) Programme (project number 09/161/101) and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment. The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the HTA programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health. Thanks to the UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, North51, National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training, participating Stop Smoking Services, PCRN/CLRN, TNS-BMRB. Note I’m not sure this is in line with NIHR guidance see relevant text copied from guidance document below: 4.4. Presentations Researchers can include the NIHR logotype on presentations about NIHR-funded research projects or awards, but not in the top right-hand corner. The NIHR logotype must be positioned bottom right, accompanied by a funding acknowledgement and disclaimer. If another NHS organisation logo is used, there are two options: 1. Use the NIHR logotype positioned bottom right on the opening slide, with a relationship statement giving details of the NIHR funding or award, and use the NHS organisation logo on all the other slides. 2. Use the NHS organisation logo on all the slides, but add a funding statement giving details of the NIHR funding or award on the opening slide. 4. The second slide on study design (slide 5 in your version) needs to be in larger font/may require some cutting of words
4
Outline Background to the study – Evaluating Longer-term Outcomes from NHS Stop Smoking Services (ELONS) Overall results: 4 and 52 week quit rates 4 and 52 weeks quit rates by key variables ELONS compared with previous studies Impact
5
Aim and objectives The study aimed to: Objectives were to:
explore the factors that determine longer term abstinence from smoking following intervention by NHS stop smoking services. Objectives were to: examine the effectiveness of NHS stop smoking services by PCT and intervention type using routine data explore the reach of services by identifying what proportion of the local population set a quit date with services using routine data describe the factors that determine longer term abstinence from smoking or relapse to smoking examine the relationship between client characteristics, adherence to treatment, intervention type received, and longer term abstinence
6
Study design Observational study
Part 1 - Secondary analysis of routine data collected by SSSs using the North51 database – completed Spring 2012 Part 2 - Prospective study of clients from 9 Stop Smoking Services in England examining different types of behavioural support: closed groups rolling groups one to one drop-in one to one sessions with a specialist advisor one to one sessions with a sessional advisor (i.e. practice nurse or pharmacist)
7
Prospective study Baseline
Stop Smoking Advisors collected additional monitoring data and saliva samples (at or around the time a quit date was set ) 4 weeks post quit date via N51 QuitManager database Self reported abstinence and CO measurement Client satisfaction survey Record of pharmacotherapy taken and session attendance 52 weeks post quit date via TNS-BMRB Self reported abstinence and CO measurement (CO measurements taken during a home visit for those who report they have quit) Collection of saliva samples Baseline: Stop Smoking Advisors collected additional monitoring data and saliva samples (at or around the time a quit date was set): Linda I've kept this vague because there were issues around when clients were recruited to ELONS. We briefed that it should be when a quit date is set but this didn’t work for some sites – remember some site were doing strange things with quite dates (ie not setting them or changing them etc) Also the issue with the time it took to obtain consent meant some site recruited clients before the set a quit date
8
Prospective study analysis
Final achieved sample was 3075 Weights created to improve the representativeness of the data (for the nine study sites) 2 stages of analysis: Bivariate descriptive analysis Multivariate logistic regression Weights were created because we achieved around 5% of the eligible number of clients who could have participated from the 9 SSS who recruited to ELONS. This level of non response means the raw data is not representative. To create the weights we used the N51 data on all clients (from the 9 sites who recruited for ELONS only) over the study recruitment period March March 2013 Data presented today will be weighed data unless otherwise specified 2 stages of analysis: Bivariate descriptive analysis - descriptive frequencies, crosstabs and chi square tests to explore the data and generate ideas for further multivariate analysis Multivariate logistic regression – to explore the relationship between quit attempt outcomes and the wide range of client and service characteristics that we collected (e.g. behavioural support, socio economic status, gender, age, level of support from family, friends)
9
CO validated quit rates (n=3057)
Raw Weighted* 4 weeks 44% 41% (35% to 48%) 52 weeks 9% 8% (7% to 9%) * Weighted for behavioural support, location, age, gender, SES.
10
Participant characteristics Multivariate regression
Weighted means Multivariate regression Not quit Quit Odds ratio (95% CI) Age (p<.05) 43 years 47 years 1.011 (1.002 to 1.020) WHO_5 Wellbeing (p<.05) 53/100 59/100 1.007 ( to 1.013) Gender N % % quit Female 1710 55.9 7.2 (6.0 to 8.5) 1.0 Male 1347 44.1 8.4 (6.8 to 10.2) 1.2 (0.9 to 1.5) SES More affluent 1123 36.7 10.3 (8.4 to 12.7) 1.4 (1.1 to 1.9) More disadvantaged 1934 63.3 6.2 (5.0 to 7.7)
11
Smoking-related characteristics
N % % quit Multivariate OR (95% CI) Dependence other 1681 55.0 9.8 (7.7 to 12.4) 1.5 (1.1 to 1.9) highly dependent 1376 45.0 4.9 (2.9 to 8.2) 1.0 Determination to quit 328 10.7 5.9 (4.3 to 8.0) NS very/extremely determined 2729 89.3 8.0 (6.7 to 9.5) Support for quit attempt from spouse/partner 1507 49.3 6.2 (4.5 to 8.5) support from spouse/partner 1550 50.7 9.2 (7.4 to 11.3) 1.4 (1.0 to 1.8) Friends and family 771 25.2 3.4 (2.6 to 4.4) half or fewer smoke 2286 74.8 9.1 (7.5 to 10.9) 2.0 (1.4 to 2.9)
12
Service and timing N % % quit Multivariate OR (95% CI)
N % % quit Multivariate OR (95% CI) Behavioural support group specialist 652 21.3 12.1 (10.5 to 13.8) 3.4 (1.7 to 6.7) drop in specialist 887 29.0 7.6 (5.1 to 11.0) 1.7 (0.9 to 3.5) one to one specialist 1131 37.0 10.2 (7.6 to 13.7) 2.3 (1.2 to 4.6) GP practice or pharmacy 366 12.0 5.1 (2.8 to 9.3) 1.0 other or unknown 21 .7 Not available 2.3 (0.5 to 11.6) Quit date other months 767 25.1 7.0 (5.2 to 9.4) 1.2 (0.8 to 1.7) Summer- July, Aug 970 31.7 6.3 (4.4 to 8.9) back to school- Sept, Oct 1128 36.9 8.7 (6.4 to 11.7) 1.2 (0.9 to 1.6) New Year- Jan, Feb 192 6.3 13.1 (5.1 to 29.6) 1.7 (1.0 to 2.9) Medication in week 1 Varenicline not recorded 1661 54.3 6.2 (4.9 to 7.7) took varenicline 1396 45.7 10.0 (7.2 to 13.8) 1.7 (1.3 to 2.3)
13
Comparison with previous studies
14
Comparison with monitoring: UK
Survival/relapse curves Data collated from published data April March (except 2012 data from Scotland and 2011/12 data for NI 52 week follow up) Only self report data is collected by the devolved services rather than CO validated No published data for England on 52 weeks – hence need for ELONS
15
Impact 724,247 quit attempts with services in England
April 2012 to March 2013 373,872 quit at 4 weeks (265,140 CO validated) 55,767 estimated quit at 12 months from ELONS data 879,458 quit attempts with services across the UK 67,718 estimated quit at 12 months if we assume similar outcomes to ELONS
16
Impact Best estimates suggest that the lifetime risk of relapse to smoking after one year is 35% On this basis if we use the ELONS results, then smoking cessation services in the UK prevented just over 44,000 premature deaths from smoking in the UK in 2012/2013. That’s more than the entire population of towns such as Dover and Bury St Edmunds.
17
Thank you 17
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.