Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCora Washington Modified over 6 years ago
1
From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2014;136(2): doi: / Figure Legend: Clockwise from left: spar-buoy, TLP, and semisubmersible floating wind turbines utilized in model testing
2
From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2014;136(2): doi: / Figure Legend: Orientations and degrees of freedom (DOF) used during model testing
3
From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2014;136(2): doi: / Figure Legend: Theoretical and measured spectra for the (a) U10 = 17.0 m/s and (b) 24.0 m/s NPD dynamic winds
4
From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2014;136(2): doi: / Figure Legend: Theoretical and measured spectra for the (a) Hs = 2.0 m, Tp = 7.5 s, (b) Hs = 7.1 m, Tp = 12.1 s, and (c) Hs = 10.5 m, Tp = 14.3 s Joint North Sea Wave Observation Project (JONSWAP) irregular waves
5
From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2014;136(2): doi: / Figure Legend: Surge response spectra for all three systems under wave only loading for the (a) Hs = 2.0 m, (b) 7.1 m, and (c) 10.5 m irregular waves
6
From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2014;136(2): doi: / Figure Legend: Pitch response spectra for all three systems under wave only loading for the (a) Hs = 2.0 m, (b) 7.1 m, and (c) 10.5 m irregular waves
7
From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2014;136(2): doi: / Figure Legend: TLP (a) surge and (b) pitch response spectra for an Hs = 10.5 m sea state with three different wind conditions
8
From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2014;136(2): doi: / Figure Legend: Spar-buoy (a) surge and (b) pitch response spectra for an Hs = 10.5 m sea state with three different wind conditions
9
From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2014;136(2): doi: / Figure Legend: Semisubmersible (a) surge and (b) pitch response spectra for an Hs = 10.5 m sea state with three different wind conditions
10
From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2014;136(2): doi: / Figure Legend: Nacelle surge acceleration spectra for all three systems under three distinct combined steady wind and irregular wave conditions of (a) Um = 11.2 m/s and Hs = 2.0 m, (b) Um = 11.2 m/s and Hs = 7.1 m, and (c) Um = 21.8 m/s and Hs = 10.5 m
11
From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2014;136(2): doi: / Figure Legend: Tower base bending moment spectra for all three systems for two combined wind/wave conditions with U10 = 17.0 m/s dynamic wind and (a) Hs = 2.0 m and (b) Hs = 10.5 m sea states
12
From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 2014;136(2): doi: / Figure Legend: Fairlead mooring tension response spectra for the (a) TLP, (b) spar-buoy, and (c) semisubmersible systems in a combined U10 = 17.0 m/s dynamic wind and Hs = 2.0 m sea state environment
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.