1. Benchmarking & Metrics Committee
Committee Presentation
What the Data Tell Us
I am here today to introduce you to some recent additions to the CII benchmarking program. What is remarkable about these developments is their move toward the use of “absolute” measurements compared with “relative” measurements. I will be explaining the difference. These absolute metrics are often more easily understood and more meaningful by being closely tied to specific work or a specific type of project. We have witnessed an increase in the participation in the CII benchmarking program which can be attributed to these additions.
Before I address these new additions, it is helpful to understand the foundation and history of the CII benchmarking program.
Benchmarking & Metrics Committee
CII Annual Conference
Orlando, Florida
July 31 – August 1, 2007

2. Committee Roster Name Company Gibson, James B. (Jim) - CoCh
Alstom Power Inc.
Helland, Harold L. - CoCh
Abbott
Allmen, Carol
General Motors Corporation
Butts, Tom
CH2M HILL
Caggiano, John J. (Joe)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Chapman, Robert E. (Bob)
National Institute of Standards & Tech.
Davis, Shari
Mustang Engineering, L.P.
Dove, Ralph
Gokey, Mark E.
Bechtel Corporation
Green, Charles M. (Charlie)
Aramco Services Company
Herrington, Robert A. (Bob)
Jacobs
Hile, David G. (Dave)
Black & Veatch
Kass, Howard
National Aeronautics & Space Admin.
Neale, David
Fluor Corporation
Nielsen, Michael J. (Mike)
Merck & Co., Inc.
Orellana, Roberto H.
The Procter & Gamble Company
Perkins, David M.
Rohm and Haas Company
Pitcher, Jonathan D. (Jon)
Eli Lilly and Company
Schilhab, Richard B. (Brad)
CB&I
Scott, Danny
BE&K Engineering Company
Slaughter, James
S&B Engineers and Constructors, Ltd.
Warnock, Stephen D. (Steve)
Washington Group International Inc.
Woldy, Paul N.
Chevron Corporation

3. CII Database 12 Years in the Making!
292
(19%)
1,270
(81%)
Domestic
International
686
(44%)
876
(56%)
Owners
Contractors
1,562 projects
Worth > $72 Billion

4. CII Database 69 146 1287 56 26 54 2 1 14 9 3 A S I A PACIFIC OCEAN80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10
EQUATOR
TROPIC OF CANCER
TROPIC OF CAPRICORN
TROP OF CAPRICORN
AUSTRALIA
A S I A
A F R I C A
E U R O P E
GREENLAND
NORTH
AMERICA
ANTARCTICA
SOUTH
P A C I F I C
O C E A N
I N D I A N
PACIFIC
OCEAN
A T L A N T I C 56 69 26 1 3 9
1287
146 14 54 2

5. CII Database

6. Focus of Recent Years Metrics Development Productivity Measurement
Industry Specific Metrics
Performance & Practice Use Metrics
Systems Development
Online Data Collection & Reporting
Electronic Data Entry (XML)
Company Level Rollup Reports

7. 2007 Focus – Analysis/Follow-up
What the Data Tell Us
Productivity Metrics Analysis
Pharma Metrics Analysis
Value of Best Practices Analysis
Continue Systems Development
Electronic Data Entry (XML)
Downloadable Data Sheets for Company Use
Company Level Rollup Reports
Internal & External Comparisons
Continue Industry Specific Team Development
Pharma
Oil & Gas
Other?

8. Pharma Benchmarking Teams
Owner Team
Abbott
Amgen
Biogen Idec
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Eli Lilly and Company
Genentech
GlaxoSmithKline
Johnson & Johnson
Merck
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories
Analysis & Team Development

9. Pharma Metrics Analysis
What Distinguishes 1Q Performers?
What is Project Success?
How to Summarize All of This Data and Make It Useful For Management?
Analysis

10. Industry Specific Metrics for Oil & Gas (Downstream)
Complete first round of data collection and validation
Perform data review with team
Define & develop reports
Assess and renew
Increase participation
Current Team
Aramco
Chevron
CITGO
Marathon Oil
Shell Oil
Petrobras
Collect/Validate Data & Team Development

11. Deliver on Existing & Pending Contracts
COAA – Benchmarking Oil Sands Projects
NIST Study on Productivity, Technology & Practice Use
Collect/Validate Data & Analysis

12. Value of Best Practices Study Joint Committee Team
Benchmarking & Metrics Committee
Implementation Strategy Committee
Knowledge Management Committee
Kim Allen – CII
Carol Allmen – General Motors
Tom Butts – CH2M Hill
Eskil Carlsson – CSA Group
Paul Chinowsky – University of Colorado
Shari Davis – Mustang Enginering
Jim Gibson – Alstom Power Inc
Charles Green – Aramco Services Company
Harold Helland – Abbott
Bob Herrington – Jacobs
Jay Hoover – NASA
Bill Kelly – University of Texas
Sang-Hoon Lee – University of Houston
Bill Mogan – Harper Industries
Mike Nielsen – Merck
Jon Pitcher – Eli Lilly
Danny Scott – BE&K Engineering
Paul Woldy – Chevron

13. Value of Best Practices Study List of Best Practices
Change Management
Front End Planning
Constructability
Zero Accident Tech
Benchmarking & Metrics
Alignment During PPP
Planning for Start-up
Team Building
Partnering
Disputes Resolution & Prevention
Project Delivery & Contract Strategy
Project Risk Assessment
Collect/Validate Data & Analysis

14. Productivity Metrics Analysis What the Data Tell Us
Quantity Based Engineering Productivity Measurement Works: The Relationships Are Strong!
Engineering Productivity is Significantly Influenced by Design Quantity: Trend Drivers are Being Identified.
Project characteristics such as project type, contract type, project size and main driver significantly impact engineering productivity.
Analysis

15. Productivity Metrics Analysis What the Data Tell Us
Implementation of 2D and 3D design platforms have a substantial impact on engineering productivity (surprising findings).
Project location affects both engineering and construction productivity
Construction and engineering productivity is impacted by the amount of overlap between the two phases.
Analysis

16. 2007 Focus – Analysis What the Data Tell Us
Productivity Metrics Analysis
Pharma Metrics Analysis
Value of Best Practices
Systems Development
Electronic Data Entry (XML)
Downloadable Data Sheets for Company Use
Company Level Rollup Reports
Internal & External Comparisons
Team Development of Specific Metrics Programs
Pharma
Oil & Gas
Other?