1. 2016/2017 EC* Pilot *Motor Carrier Electronic Credentials
Paul Bernander, WI
Annual Business Meeting
August 17, 2016, Indianapolis
Begin with – in this pilot, I’m grateful for participation by, and support of: 1) Participating states’ IFTA offices, Participating states’ law enforcement, Participating carriers and their innovation, the IFTA ICWG, IFTA, Inc. staff and IRP, Inc. staff, and specifically including Lonette Turner and Tim Adams.

2. Extended a year – now: April 1, 2016 – September 30, 2017
Ballot timing for IFTA and IRP

3. IMAGES phase – the EC Pilot DATA phase
Neither paper nor electronic images in the cab
Rely on enforcement access to databases
Like UCR (Unified Carrier Registration)

4. During the EC Pilot, paper in the cab
IMAGES:
pdf
URL (Uniform Resources Locator) – a web address
During the EC Pilot, paper in the cab

5. 2016 ABM
Update on EC Pilot
Ballot discussion
Informal
Town Hall

6. Preliminary observations
Update
Number of carriers
Preliminary observations
Images
pdf
URL
not so much yet

7. Enforcement responses Jur admin office responses
Carrier responses
Enforcement responses
Jur admin office responses
pdf’s
Scanned by carrier is ok

8. In the months ahead: September 2016 Second carrier/driver webinar
Second survey – look back 30 days

9. December 2016 – initial report for review
What we’ve learned
Recommendations

10. Recommendations
Technology
Best practices

11. Recommendations (continued)
Model statutes – three elements:
Accepting electronic credentials
Limiting enforcement use of the device
Limiting enforcement liability for damage to devices

12. February 2017 Draft ballot language Seek reactions and suggestions
Maybe a ballot webinar

13. DATA phase food for thought:
Real-time data – not overnight
All jurisdictions’ data, including provinces
All-geographic – “dead zones?”
Easy to access
Desirable: multiple credentials in one place
Leadership: Which entity(ies)?

14. IMAGES PHASE – ballot ideas for discussion Electronic images
pdf
URL
Other?

15. Substitute for paper
At the option of the carrier
Effective date - delayed

16. Questions and feedback, please!
Paul Bernander, WI

17. Draft model statutory language – for discussion
Bonus content!
Draft model statutory language – for discussion
Electronic format: At the option of the driver, the proof required under this subsection may be produced in either printed or electronic format, including by display of electronic images on a cellular telephone or other electronic device, by website, or by Modeled largely after Section (2), Wisconsin Statute.

18. Limited use of the device: If this proof is displayed in electronic format on any cellular telephone or other electronic device, the traffic officer may not view, and producing proof in electronic format is not considered consent for the traffic officer to view, any content on the telephone or other electronic device except the proof required under this subsection. Modeled after Section (2), Wisconsin Statutes.

19. Limited liability for damage to the device: Whenever a person presents a mobile electronic device as proof of a credential to any peace officer, commercial vehicle enforcement officer, or commercial vehicle inspector pursuant to this section, that person shall assume all liability for any damage to the mobile electronic device, except for damage willfully or maliciously caused by a peace officer, commercial vehicle enforcement officer, or commercial vehicle inspector.  Modeled largely after Missouri Revised Statutes, Section ] 8/17/2016