Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Work-in-progress – not for distribution

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Work-in-progress – not for distribution"— Presentation transcript:

1 Work-in-progress – not for distribution
Iowa Topline Planning March 2015 Work-in-progress – not for distribution

2 Iowa Caucus Turnout History Organizing Model and Approach
IA Contents 1 6 Iowa Caucus Turnout History Budget Focus 2 7 SWOT Analysis Staff Structure 3 8 Strategy Organizing Model and Approach 4 9 Guiding Principles Phases 5 10 Goals and Tactics Candidate Requests Work-in-progress – not for distribution

3 Historical Democratic Caucus Turnout
“` IA Historical Democratic Caucus Turnout Percent of Democratic Registrants who Caucused Raw Democratic Caucus Turnout Estimated 2016 Democratic Caucus Turnout = 31,908 (5% of 638,157 Registered Democratic Voters) Ceiling Benchmark = 2000 (Gore vs. Bradley) Floor Benchmark = 2012 (Obama unopposed) Work-in-progress – not for distribution

4 Work-in-progress – not for distribution
“` IA Caucus Overview Maps Work-in-progress – not for distribution

5 Work-in-progress – not for distribution
“` IA Caucus Overview Maps Work-in-progress – not for distribution

6 Work-in-progress – not for distribution
“` IA Caucus Overview Maps Work-in-progress – not for distribution

7 Work-in-progress – not for distribution
“` IA 2008 Clinton Support Map Work-in-progress – not for distribution

8 Work-in-progress – not for distribution
IA SWOT analysis Strengths Likely organizational advantage Likely resource advantage High initial approval ratings Historic context Lack of strong competition Weaknesses Historically apathetic caucus electorate Lack of existing organization in state Diminishing party infrastructure and pessimistic Democratic base Perception that the candidate does not prioritize the caucus Opportunities Significant interest in candidate Low expectations among activists in terms of commitment to Iowa Ability to develop an organization early Ability to demonstrate that campaign is going “all in” on Iowa Threats Inflated expectations about win margin and turnout Media and activist desire for competitive caucus Sustained Republican attacks Poor history with female candidates in the IA caucus Work-in-progress – not for distribution

9 Strategic Summary – Iowa:
IA Strategic Overview Strategic Summary – Iowa: In many ways Iowa will set the tone for the campaign at large. We must show that we’re different, committed to highlighting and empowering Iowans and the stories that connect them to the campaign, and focused on building a powerful organization inclusive of everyone who wants to take part especially people who never have before. SET EXPECTATIONS EARLY BUILD AN UNPRECEDENTED AND UNEXPECTED ORGANIZATION CONNECT IOWA TO THE CANDIDATE THROUGH IOWAN STORIES ENGAGE AND MOBILIZE A TARGETED EXPANSION UNIVERSE Work-in-progress – not for distribution

10 IA Guiding Principles

11 Goals and Tactics IA Organize, Energize, and Mobilize Democrats
Combine digital and field organizing Ubiquitous precinct-level organization Two-tiered organizing model Supporter/Commitment Signatures Targeted caucus expansion program Connect Iowans to the Candidate Identify and communicate stories of Iowans Let Iowans speak for the candidate – not politicians or well-known endorsers Use events to highlight Iowan stories Build an Iowa Coalition Make the campaign the vehicle for strengthening and sustaining the Party Build relationships with supportive groups and organizations around program Work-in-progress – not for distribution

12 Iowa Event Strategy Personal and Unexpected IA Non-Traditional Retail
Farmers Markets Women-focused Events Iowa Cultural Events RAGBRAI Intimate Message Events Organizing house parties Roundtables Local media focus Off the Record Built into every trip Ample time to interact with people Work-in-progress – not for distribution

13 Organizing and Outreach
IA Budget Focus In-House video and design team Invest in hardware and software for content creation and editing Social media coordinator for strategic distribution Quality content for paid distribution Iowa Specific Content Investment in organizing staff Investment in digital organizing staff Invest in large political and outreach team Organizing and Outreach Invest in true in-state analytics program Integrate analytics into departments outside of field Data and Analytics Work-in-progress – not for distribution

14 Traditional/Digital Integration The New Organizing Model
IA Traditional Field + Digital Organizing = IA ORGANIZING Traditional/Digital Integration The New Organizing Model Training Building a digital organization in your turf Using the digital organization to engage your volunteers Using the digital organization to get results through affirmation and social pressure ORGANIZER Technology Tracking organizer activity online Accurately measuring engagement and outcomes of engagement Creating mechanisms for testing the theory and providing insight into maximizing efficacy of the program Work-in-progress – not for distribution

15 Work-in-progress – not for distribution
IA Organizing Takeaways from Iowa and 2012 Iowa Model revolves around precinct captains (1774 precincts) Teams formed around precinct captains What worked Caucus representation at every precinct Manage supporter lists Localized What didn’t work Never full representation No volunteer leadership in early stages of campaign 2012 Neighborhood Teams Model focused on teams of volunteers in designated geographies Volunteers from within designated geography assume different responsibilities What worked Localized the volunteer model Gave responsibility to top volunteers Utilized an organizing approach What didn’t work Significant disparity among teams skill and output Not localized for a caucus operation Designated geography hampered even distribution of volunteer resources Work-in-progress – not for distribution

16 Work-in-progress – not for distribution
IA Two-Tiered Organizing Model Community Lead Responsible for recruiting precinct captains and voter contact volunteers in a designated group of precincts Responsible for organizing two weekly voter contact or volunteer recruitment activities per week Time commitment: 8-15 Hrs/Week Programmatic Lead Highly trained in a specific component of the program Programmatic leads will be recruited on a timeline based on needs of their skill Time commitment: 4-12 Hrs/Week Work-in-progress – not for distribution

17 Volunteer Leader Testing Tracks
IA Volunteer Leader Testing Tracks Community Leads Active Volunteer Community Lead Prospect Elevation 1:1 with Organizer Test 1 – Manage DVC Activity Test 1 Evaluation Test 2 – Recruit and Manage DVC Activity Organizer 1:1 – Confirm Lead Programmatic Leads Active Vol or Supporter/Activist Programmatic Lead Prospect Elevation 1:1 with Organizer Training Test 1 Test 1 Evaluation and Training Test 2 Organizer 1:1 – Confirm Lead


Download ppt "Work-in-progress – not for distribution"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google