Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEgbert Merritt Modified over 6 years ago
1
INFRASTRUCTURE AND THE LAW:FLORIDA’S PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE
JULIAN CONRAD JUERGENSMEYER PROFESSOR AND BEN F. JOHNSON PROFESSOR OF LAW GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY
2
IS FLORIDA OVER?
6
GROWTH MANAGEMENT = INFRASTRUCTURE AVAILABILITY
Golden v. Planning Board of Town of Ramapo, 30 N.Y, 2d 359 (1972).
7
SMART GROWTH =INFRASTRUCTURE + DESIGN
APA “ Smart growth means using comprehensive planning to guide, design, develop, revitalize and build communities for all that have a unique sense of community and place, preserve and enhance valuable natural and cultural resources, equitable distribute the costs and benefits of development, expand the range of transportation, employment and housing choices in a fiscally responsible manner…
8
MAGNA CHARTA
9
MAGNA CHARTA CONTINUED
10
FLORIDA CASE LAW Hollywood Inc. v. Broward County, 431 So.2d 606 (Fla App. 1983) St. Johns County v. Northeast Fla. Builders Assn 583 So.2d 635 (Fla. 1991).
11
EVOLUTION OF IMPACT FEES
PREDICTION: USE OF OTHER TERMINOLOGY FOR IMPACT FEES TO ESCAPE VARIOUS JUDICIAL AND LEGISLATIVE RESTRICTIONS EXTEND IMPACT FEES TO SOCIAL AND GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE GREATER COMBINATION OF DEVELOPER FUNDING DEVICES
12
DESTIN WORKFORCE HOUSING PROGRAM
1. REQUIRE ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION 2. OFF-SITE CONSTRUCTION 3. CONVERT MARKET TO WORKFORCE 4. “TRANSFER” OBLIGATION TO NONPROFIT 5. PAY FEE-IN-LIEU
13
Impact Fee Enabling Acts And Florida
Over the years many bills introduced but only statutory references until 2006 2006 Fla. Stat 2007 SB 576 – did NOT pass
14
My Proposal I recant – lets adopt an act covering IFs BUT not just IFs
Time has come for a unified and comprehensive statutory approach to Developer provided/funded infrastructure requirements
15
Proposal Cont. Including: Dedication and Construction Requirements
Mitigation Requirements Required Contributions Concurrency Requirements Consistency Standards
16
Federal Role A Resurrected/Improved National Infrastructure Funding Initiative Remember Hart Proposal (introduced 4/3/1985) S.849 Title: A bill to establish a National Infrastructure Fund to provide funds for interest-free loans to State and local governments for construction and improvement of highways, bridges, water supply and distribution systems, mass transportation facilities and equipment, and wastewater treatment facilities, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Sen Hart, Gary W. [CO]
17
CURRENTLY BEFORE CONGRESS
REBUILDING AMERICA’S INFRASTRUCTURE ACT, HR 3400 NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 2007, S775, HR 3538
18
State Role Formulation and a Enforcement of New Comprehensive Code on a Regional as well as Local Basis State Infrastructure Funding Program Similar to Federal: To Supplement/Match Federal To Pay for Existing Deficit and Protect New Development from Disproportionate Share of the Bill
19
Remember Dual Rational Nexus Test
PRONG 1 IMPACT FEES MAY BE NO MORE THAN THE GOVERNMENT’S INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS WHICH ARE REASONABLY ATTRIBUTABLE TO NEW DEVELOPMENT aka PROPORTIONATE SHARE
20
DRN Test Prong II The new development required to pay impact fees must benefit from the expenditure of those fees
21
Difficult Issues Include
Credits Operation and Maintenance Benefit Districts/Service Areas Regional Needs and Coordination
22
Florida: Sunrise or Sunset?
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.