Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBriana Rodgers Modified over 6 years ago
1
A proficiency test system to improve performance of milk analysis methods and produce reference values for component calibration samples for infrared milk analysis1 Karen L. Wojciechowski, Caterina Melilli, David M. Barbano Journal of Dairy Science Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016) DOI: /jds Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
2
Figure 1 Euclidean distance plot of ether extraction method (AOAC Method ; AOAC International, 2000) variation among laboratories in Software: Lab Compare V1.30, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. RR=round robin; SDD=standard deviation of the difference. Color version available online. Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
3
Figure 2 Euclidean distance plot of Kjeldahl true protein method variation (AOAC method ; AOAC International, 2000) among laboratories in Software: Lab Compare V1.30, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. RR=round robin; SDD=standard deviation of the difference. Color version available online. Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
4
Figure 3 Euclidean distance plot of enzymatic lactose method variation (AOAC method ; AOAC International, 2000) among laboratories in Software: Lab Compare V1.30, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. RR=round robin; SDD=standard deviation of the difference. Color version available online. Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
5
Figure 4 Euclidean distance plot of oven-drying TS method variation (AOAC method ; AOAC International, 2000) among laboratories in Software: Lab Compare V1.30, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. RR=round robin; SDD=standard deviation of the difference. Color version available online. Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
6
Figure 5 Pareto diagram of ether extraction performance (AOAC method ; AOAC International, 2000) among laboratories in Software: Lab Compare V1.30, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. RR=round robin; SDD=standard deviation of the difference. Color version available online. Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
7
Figure 6 Pareto diagram of Kjeldahl true protein method variation (AOAC method ; AOAC International, 2000) among laboratories in Software: Lab Compare V1.30, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. RR=round robin; SDD=standard deviation of the difference. Color version available online. Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
8
Figure 7 Pareto diagram of enzymatic lactose method variation (AOAC method ; AOAC International, 2000) among laboratories in Software: Lab Compare V1.30, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. RR=round robin; SDD=standard deviation of the difference. Color version available online. Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
9
Figure 8 Pareto diagram of oven-drying TS method variation (AOAC ; AOAC International, 2000) among laboratories in Software: Lab Compare V1.30, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. RR=round robin; SDD=standard deviation of the difference. Color version available online. Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
10
Figure 9 Residual plot of differences from the all-laboratory mean ether extraction (AOAC method ; AOAC International, 2000) result for laboratory 4, as a function of fat content of milk. Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
11
Figure 10 Residual plot of differences from the all-laboratory mean ether extraction (AOAC method ; AOAC International, 2000) result for laboratory 10, as a function of fat content of milk. Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
12
Figure 11 Residual plot of differences from the all-laboratory mean ether extraction (AOAC method ; AOAC International, 2000) result for laboratory 11, as a function of fat content of milk. Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
13
Figure 12 Residual plot of differences from the all-laboratory mean Kjeldahl true protein (AOAC method ; AOAC International, 2000) result for laboratory 4, as a function of true protein content of milk. Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
14
Figure 13 Residual plot of differences from the all-laboratory mean Kjeldahl true protein (AOAC method ; AOAC International, 2000) result for laboratory 2, as a function of true protein content of milk. Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
15
Figure 14 Residual plot of differences from the all-laboratory mean Kjeldahl true protein (AOAC method ; AOAC International, 2000) result for laboratory 3, as a function of true protein content of milk. Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
16
Figure 15 Residual plot of differences from the all-laboratory mean Kjeldahl true protein (AOAC method ; AOAC International, 2000) result for laboratory 7, as a function of true protein content of milk. Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
17
Figure 16 Sensitivity analysis demonstrating the influence N HCl titrant concentration uncertainty on the residual difference from the all-laboratory mean in a laboratory proficiency test evaluation using 14 milks over a range of protein from 2 to 4.3% true protein for the Kjeldahl method (AOAC method ; AOAC International, 2000). Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
18
Figure 17 Residual plot of differences from the all-laboratory mean forced-air, oven-drying TS (AOAC method ; AOAC International, 2000) result for laboratory 1, as a function of TS content of milk. Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
19
Figure 18 Residual plot of differences from the all-laboratory mean forced-air, oven-drying TS (AOAC method ; AOAC International, 2000) result for laboratory 10, as a function of TS content of milk. Journal of Dairy Science , DOI: ( /jds ) Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.