Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAustin Ward Modified over 6 years ago
1
Soil examination for a forensic trace evidence laboratory—Part 1: Spectroscopic techniques
Brenda Woods, Chris Lennard, K. Paul Kirkbride, James Robertson Forensic Science International Volume 245, Pages (December 2014) DOI: /j.forsciint Copyright © Terms and Conditions
2
Fig. 1 Map of Australia [21] with approximate locations of soil sites used in this study. Forensic Science International , DOI: ( /j.forsciint ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions
3
Fig. 2 Microspectrophotometer (MSP) spectra for soil specimens from site 2 surface (spectrum b) and site 1 surface and sub-surface (spectra a and c respectively). Using the MSP spectra the surface soil specimen from site 2 (spectrum b) can be differentiated from the surface and sub-surface soils of site 1. The surface and sub-surface soils of site 1 cannot be differentiated using this MSP spectra alone. Forensic Science International , DOI: ( /j.forsciint ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions
4
Fig. 3 Matrix plot of the CIE L*a*b* chromaticity coordinates for triplicate analyses of the 12 soil specimens from the Canberra area. Forensic Science International , DOI: ( /j.forsciint ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions
5
Fig. 4 Microspectrophotometer (MSP) spectra for soil specimens from sites 11 (near Weipa, Queensland–spectrum a), 17 (near Millicent, South Australia – spectrum c) and 21 (near Alice Springs, Northern Territory – spectrum b). All these soil specimens can be differentiated using MSP. Forensic Science International , DOI: ( /j.forsciint ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions
6
Fig. 5 Matrix plot of the CIE L*a*b* chromaticity coordinates for triplicate analyses of the CSIRO soil specimens. Forensic Science International , DOI: ( /j.forsciint ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions
7
Fig. 6 Spectral variation observed between site 1 surface (spectrum a), site 3 surface (spectrum b) and site 4 (spectrum c) possibly due to the presence of kaolin minerals (indicated by peaks at 3700/3620cm−1). Forensic Science International , DOI: ( /j.forsciint ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions
8
Fig. 7 Spectral variation observed between site 1 surface (spectrum a), site 3 surface (spectrum b) and site 4 (spectrum c) possibly due to the presence of quartz (indicated by peaks at 796/779/694cm−1). Forensic Science International , DOI: ( /j.forsciint ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions
9
Fig. 8 Score plots of the first two principle components for both the original (a) and the 1st derivative spectral (b) data for the 12 Canberra area soil specimens. Forensic Science International , DOI: ( /j.forsciint ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions
10
Fig. 9 A section of the score plot of the first two principle components for the original IR spectral data for the CSIRO soil specimens showing the grouping into 10 groups. Sites 13, 14, 16, 17 and 21 could also be differentiated from the groups illustrated, however these are not shown on the plot as they fall outside the chosen axes. Forensic Science International , DOI: ( /j.forsciint ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions
11
Fig. 10 A section of the score plot of the first two principle components for the 1st derivative IR spectral data for the CSIRO soil specimens showing the grouping into 15 groups. Site 17 could also be differentiated from the groups illustrated, however this is not shown on the plot as it falls outside the chosen axes. Forensic Science International , DOI: ( /j.forsciint ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.