Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Fig. 3. Mean percentage of landing (a) and mean trapped R

Published byDulcie Henderson Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Fig. 3. Mean percentage of landing (a) and mean trapped R"— Presentation transcript:

1 Fig. 3. Mean percentage of landing (a) and mean trapped R
Fig. 3. Mean percentage of landing (a) and mean trapped R. pomonella flies ± SE (b) in different bottle traps with color circles with, or without, colored background. Percentage of visits was also divided in reference to the lower (black), middle (white), and upper (gray) part of the bottle trap. Nontransformed means are shown. Similar letters indicate no significant differences among model traps (Tukey, P < 0.05). From: Development of a Low-Cost and Effective Trapping Device for Apple Maggot Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Monitoring and Control in Mexican Commercial Hawthorn Groves J Econ Entomol. 2017;110(4): doi: /jee/tox167 J Econ Entomol | © The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

2 Fig. 2. Mean percentage of landing (a) and mean trapped R
Fig. 2. Mean percentage of landing (a) and mean trapped R. pomonella flies ± SE (b) in colorless trap (n/c) and traps with different colored circles. Percentage of visits was also divided in reference to the lower (black), middle (white), and upper (gray) part of the bottle trap. Nontransformed means are shown. Columns headed by different letters indicate significant differences among model traps (Tukey, P < 0.05). From: Development of a Low-Cost and Effective Trapping Device for Apple Maggot Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Monitoring and Control in Mexican Commercial Hawthorn Groves J Econ Entomol. 2017;110(4): doi: /jee/tox167 J Econ Entomol | © The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

3 Fig. 4. Mean trapped R. pomonella flies ± SE in PET bottle trap with yellow colored circles and red circles with a yellow background (Fig. 1b). Different letters indicate significant differences among model traps (Tukey, P < 0.05). From: Development of a Low-Cost and Effective Trapping Device for Apple Maggot Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Monitoring and Control in Mexican Commercial Hawthorn Groves J Econ Entomol. 2017;110(4): doi: /jee/tox167 J Econ Entomol | © The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

4 Fig. 1. Traps used in the R. pomonella trapping experiments: (a) Pherocon AM adherent trap with the inclusion of a bottle trap for lure emission, (b) Adapted bottle trap, and (c) Bottle sections considered for fly landing tests. From: Development of a Low-Cost and Effective Trapping Device for Apple Maggot Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Monitoring and Control in Mexican Commercial Hawthorn Groves J Econ Entomol. 2017;110(4): doi: /jee/tox167 J Econ Entomol | © The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

Download ppt "Fig. 3. Mean percentage of landing (a) and mean trapped R"

Similar presentations

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation
From: An open day in the metric space

From: An open day in the metric space
Fig. 1 Flow chart of the COBRA-light trial and its extension study

Fig. 1 Flow chart of the COBRA-light trial and its extension study
From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*
Figure 1: effects of the fire frequency and season treatments on cumulative mean fire intensity (mean intensity of all fires on a plot × number of fires/period.

Figure 1: effects of the fire frequency and season treatments on cumulative mean fire intensity (mean intensity of all fires on a plot × number of fires/period.
From: Index Funds, Financialization, and Commodity Futures Markets

From: Index Funds, Financialization, and Commodity Futures Markets
Fig. 1 Graphical representation

Fig. 1 Graphical representation
Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.
Fig. 3 Evolutionary game types as a function of relatedness and synergy where each plot is a different social group size. The payoffs used to generate.

Fig. 3 Evolutionary game types as a function of relatedness and synergy where each plot is a different social group size. The payoffs used to generate.
Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.

Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.
Fig. 8. Mean (+ SE) initial larval weight and weight at the time of transfer to fresh diet (transfer weight) of A. planipennis fed for 31 d on artificial.

Fig. 8. Mean (+ SE) initial larval weight and weight at the time of transfer to fresh diet (transfer weight) of A. planipennis fed for 31 d on artificial.
Fig. 2. Pearson correlation analysis based on three quality parameters; sugar content, acidity, and penetrating resistance. Sixty samples of grape berries.

Fig. 2. Pearson correlation analysis based on three quality parameters; sugar content, acidity, and penetrating resistance. Sixty samples of grape berries.
Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.

Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.
From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution

From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution
Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.

Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.
Error bars represent the mean (s.e.).

Error bars represent the mean (s.e.).
Source:Ellerman, Convery, and de Perthuis (2010). Figure 6. 2, p

Source:Ellerman, Convery, and de Perthuis (2010). Figure 6. 2, p
Fig. 1. Map of sample collection sites.

Fig. 1. Map of sample collection sites.
From: Soil temperature modifies effects of soil biota on plant growth

From: Soil temperature modifies effects of soil biota on plant growth
Fig. 7. Estimated damage ratio (eqn 3) of Abies mariesii along an altitude. The lines indicate 5, 10, 20 and 40 cm of DBH, as shown. Regression lines are.

Fig. 7. Estimated damage ratio (eqn 3) of Abies mariesii along an altitude. The lines indicate 5, 10, 20 and 40 cm of DBH, as shown. Regression lines are.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google