Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBarry Parker Modified over 6 years ago
1
Figure 1. Meta-analysis of prospective biomarker studies examining associations between eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and total, low-, and high-grade prostate cancer risk. Dots and horizontal lines correspond to relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively, comparing the highest vs lowest quantile of EPA measured in blood for each study. The size of the shaded square represents the study-specific weight in the meta-analysis. The diamond represents the meta-relative risk and 95% confidence interval. Relative risks estimated assuming fixed effects. All statistical tests were two-sided. From: Plasma Phospholipid Fatty Acids and Prostate Cancer Risk in the SELECT Trial J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(15): doi: /jnci/djt174 J Natl Cancer Inst | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
2
Figure 2. Meta-analysis of prospective biomarker studies examining associations between docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and total, low-, and high-grade prostate cancer risk. Dots and horizontal lines correspond to relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively, for each study for comparisons of the highest vs lowest quantile of DHA measured in blood. The size of the shaded square represents the study-specific weight in the meta-analysis. The diamond represents the meta-relative risk and 95% confidence interval. Relative risks estimated assuming fixed effects. All statistical tests were two-sided. From: Plasma Phospholipid Fatty Acids and Prostate Cancer Risk in the SELECT Trial J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(15): doi: /jnci/djt174 J Natl Cancer Inst | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
3
Figure 3. Meta-analysis of prospective biomarker studies examining associations between total long-chain ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and total, low-, and high-grade prostate cancer risk. Dots and horizontal lines correspond to relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively, for each study for comparisons of the highest vs lowest quantile of long-chain ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids measured in blood. The size of the shaded square represents the study-specific weight in the meta-analysis. The diamond represents the meta-relative risk and 95% confidence interval. Relative risks estimated assuming fixed effects. All statistical tests were two-sided. From: Plasma Phospholipid Fatty Acids and Prostate Cancer Risk in the SELECT Trial J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(15): doi: /jnci/djt174 J Natl Cancer Inst | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.