Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Lecture 2-6 Polynomial Time Hierarchy
2
Nonunique Probe Selection and Group Testing
3
DNA Hybridization
4
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
cell-free method of DNA cloning Advantages much faster than cell based method need very small amount of target DNA Disadvantages need to synthesize primers applies only to short DNA fragments(<5kb)
5
Preparation of a DNA Library
DNA library: a collection of cloned DNA fragments usually from a specific organism
6
DNA Library Screening
7
Problem If a probe doesn’t uniquely determine a virus, i.e., a probe determine a group of viruses, how to select a subset of probes from a given set of probes, in order to be able to find up to d viruses in a blood sample.
8
Binary Matrix viruses c1 c2 c3 cj cn
p … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … p … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 p … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 probes … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 . pi … 0 … 0 … 1 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 pt … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 The cell (i, j) contains 1 iff the ith probe hybridizes the jth virus.
9
Binary Matrix of Example
virus c1 c2 c cj p p p probes Observation: All columns are distinct. To identify up to d viruses, all unions of up to d columns should be distinct!
10
d-Separable Matrix _ All unions of up to d columns are distinct.
viruses c1 c2 c cj cn p … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 p … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 p … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 probes … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 . pi … 0 … 0 … 1 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 pt … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 … 0 All unions of up to d columns are distinct. Decoding: O(nd)
12
Nonunique Probe Selection
_ Given a binary matrix, find a d-separable submatrix with the same number of columns and the minimum number of rows. Given a binary matrix, find a d-disjunct submatrix with the same number of columns and the minimum number of rows. Given a binary matrix, find a d-separable submatrix with the same number of columns and the minimum number of rows
13
Complexity? All three problems may not be in NP, why?
Guess a t x n matrix M, verify if M is d-separable (d-separable, d-disjunct). -
14
Problem
15
- d-Separability Test - Given a matrix M and d, is M d-separable?
It is co-NP-complete.
16
- d-Separability Test - Given a matrix M and d, is M d-separable?
This is co-NP-complete. (a) It is in co-NP. Guess two samples from space S(n,d). Check if M gives the same test outcome on the two samples. -
17
(b) Reduction from vertex-cover
Given a graph G and h > 0, does G have a vertex cover of size at most h?
19
d-Separability Test Reduces to d-Separability Test
Put a zero column to M to form a new matrix M* Then M is d-separable if and only if M* is d-separable. -
20
d-Disjunct Test Given a matrix M and d, is M d-disjunct?
This is co-NP-complete.
21
Minimum d-Separable Submatrix
Given a binary matrix, find a d-separable submatrix with minimum number of rows and the same number of columns. For any fixed d >0, the problem is co-NP-hard. In general, the problem is in and conjectured to be –complete.
23
Polynomial Time Hierarchy
24
PSPACE PH P
25
Oracle TM Query tape yes Query state no Remark:
26
A is polynomial-time Turing-reducible to B if there exists a polynomial-time DTM with oracle B, accepting A.
27
Example
28
Example
29
Definition
30
Definition
31
Definition Remark
32
Theorem Proof
33
PSPACE PH P
34
Characterization THEOREM PROOF by induction on k
35
Induction Step on k>1
40
Characterization THEOREM PROOF by induction on k
41
Induction Step on k>1
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.