Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Patricia Solvignon Temple University

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Patricia Solvignon Temple University"— Presentation transcript:

1 Patricia Solvignon Temple University
Study of Quark-Hadron Duality on Neutron and 3He Spin Structure Functions Patricia Solvignon Temple University Hall A Interview Seminar Jefferson Lab, Newport News March 24, 2006

2 Outlines Brief theoretical description of Quark-Hadron Duality
Experimental setup Analysis steps Preliminary results on the Spin Structure Functions Preliminary test of Quark-Hadron Duality on Neutron and 3He

3 Inclusive Electron Scattering
Photon momentum transfer Invariant mass squared Bjorken variable

4 Inclusive Electron Scattering
Photon momentum transfer Invariant mass squared Bjorken variable { Unpolarized case

5 Inclusive Electron Scattering
Photon momentum transfer Invariant mass squared Bjorken variable { Unpolarized case { Polarized case

6 Resonance region Q2 Low Q2 and W<2 GeV : coarse resolution  we don’t see partons. The nucleon goes through different excited states: the resonances

7 Deep Inelastic Scattering
Q2 u d d High Q2 and W>2GeV: fine resolution  we see partons asymptotic freedom of the strong interaction Parton model: scaling 2004 Nobel Prize D. J. Gross, H. D. Politzer and F. Wilczek

8 Scaling of F2 F2= 1990 Nobel Prize
Figure from: H. W. Kendall, Rev. Mod. Phys. 63 (1991) 597 1990 Nobel Prize J. I. Friedman, H. W. Kendall and R. E. Taylor

9 Structure functions in the parton model
In the infinite-momentum frame: no time for interactions between partons Partons are point-like non-interacting particles: Nucleon = i i No simple partonic distribution for g2(x,Q2)

10 First observed by Bloom and Gilman in the 1970’s on F2
Quark-hadron duality First observed by Bloom and Gilman in the 1970’s on F2 Scaling curve seen at high Q2 is an accurate average over the resonance region at lower Q2 Global and Local duality are observed for F2 I. Niculescu et al., PRL 85 (2000) 1182

11 Theoretical interpretations
Lattice QCD PT Quark models OPE pQCD Q2 =∞ Q2 =0 Operator Product Expansion (Rujula, Georgi, Politzer):  Higher twist corrections are small or cancel. pQCD (Carlson, Mukhopadhyay):  Q2 dependence of transition form factors vs. x dependence of parton distribution functions SU(6) symmetry breaking in the quark model (Close, Isgur and Melnitchouk):  investigate several scenarios with suppression of: spin-3/2 helicity-3/2 symmetric wave function

12 Scaling of g1 moments proton neutron
M. Amerian et al., PRL 859(2002) R. Fatemi et al., PRL 91 (2003)

13 World data HERMES for A1p Jlab Hall B for g1p preliminary
A. Airapeian et al., PRL 90 (2003) Jlab Hall B for g1p From DIS 2005 proceedings preliminary

14 World data Indication of duality from Jlab Hall A for g13He

15 The experiment E01-012  Test of spin duality on the neutron (and 3He)
Ran in Jan.-Feb. 2003 Inclusive experiment: Measured polarized cross section differences Form g1 and g2  Test of spin duality on the neutron (and 3He)

16 3He as an effective neutron target

17 The E Collaboration K. Aniol, T. Averett, W. Boeglin, A. Camsonne, G.D. Cates, G. Chang, J.-P. Chen, Seonho Choi, E. Chudakov, B. Craver, F. Cusanno, A. Deur, D. Dutta, R. Ent, R. Feuerbach, S. Frullani, H. Gao, F. Garibaldi, R. Gilman, C. Glashausser, O. Hansen, D. Higinbotham, H. Ibrahim, X. Jiang, M. Jones, A. Kelleher, J. Kelly, C. Keppel, W. Kim, W. Korsch,K. Kramer, G. Kumbartzki, J. LeRose, R. Lindgren, N. Liyanage, B. Ma, D. Margaziotis, P. Markowitz, K. McCormick, Z.-E. Meziani, R. Michaels, B. Moffit, P. Monaghan, C. Munoz Camacho, K. Paschke, B. Reitz, A. Saha, R. Sheyor, J. Singh, K. Slifer, P. Solvignon, V. Sulkosky, A. Tobias, G. Urciuoli, K. Wang, K. Wijesooriya, B. Wojtsekhowski, S. Woo, J.-C. Yang, X. Zheng, L. Zhu and the Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration

18 Experimental setup Standard Hall A equipment:
Polarized electron beam Standard Hall A equipment: Both HRS in symmetric configuration double the statistics control the systematics Particle ID = Cerenkov + EM calorimeter  /e reduced by 104 Polarized 3He target

19 Electron Beam Polarization
Used Moller Polarimeter: measurements performed by E. Chudakov et al. 70 < Pbeam < 85% for production data

20 How to polarize 3He ? Two step process:
Rb vapor is polarized by optical pumping with circularly polarized light Rb e- polarization is transferred to 3He nucleus by spin-exchange interaction A small amount of N2 is added for quenching

21 The polarized 3He target
Two chamber cell Pressure ~ 14 atm under running conditions High luminosity: 1036 s-1cm-2 Ltg ~ 40cm

22 The polarized 3He system
Longitudinal and transverse configurations 2 independent polarimetries: NMR and EPR

23 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
P3He = w S w : from calibration with an identical target cell filled with water S Apply perpendicular RF field Ramp holding field (H0) } flip the 3He spins under AFP conditions

24 Electron Paramagnetic Resonance
2 P3He = epr  Polarized 3He creates an extra magnetic field: B3He Measure the Zeeman splitting frequency when B0 and B3He are aligned and anti-aligned. epr : depend of cell density and holding field.

25 Target performance Pavg~ 37% Statistical errors only

26 Analysis scheme Radiative corrections

27 Pion asymmetries Statistical errors only 4GeV, 25o 3GeV, 25o 5GeV, 25o

28 The CO2 gas Cerenkov counter
Index of refraction: n = Knock-out e- & Low energy e-

29 Lead Glass Calorimeter
Cuts applied for electron efficiency > 99%

30 Unpolarized cross sections
4GeV, 25o 3GeV, 25o 5GeV, 25o 5GeV, 32o

31 Unpolarized cross sections
3GeV, 25o 4GeV, 25o 5GeV, 25o 5GeV, 32o

32 Unpolarized cross sections
3GeV, 25o 4GeV, 25o 5GeV, 25o 5GeV, 32o

33 Unpolarized cross sections
3GeV, 25o 4GeV, 25o 5GeV, 25o 5GeV, 32o

34 Unpolarized cross sections
3GeV, 25o 4GeV, 25o 5GeV, 25o 5GeV, 32o

35 Radiative corrections
At reaction point: E0 Ep External

36 Radiative corrections
Internal At reaction point: E0 Ep External

37 Radiative corrections
Internal At reaction point: E0 Ep External

38 Radiative corrections
Internal At reaction point: E0 Ep External Computation to get the real reaction

39 Radiative corrections
Used QFS model for o. Next will use E data for o: Used E data as a model for radiative corrections at the lowest energy:

40 Unpolarized cross sections
3GeV, 25o 4GeV, 25o 5GeV, 25o 5GeV, 32o

41 Unpolarized cross sections
3GeV, 25o 4GeV, 25o 5GeV, 25o 5GeV, 32o

42 Asymmetries 3GeV, 25o 4GeV, 25o 5GeV, 25o 5GeV, 32o

43 Asymmetries Statistical errors only 3GeV, 25o 4GeV, 25o 5GeV, 25o

44 g13He at constant Q2

45 g13He at constant Q2

46 g13He at constant Q2

47 g13He at constant Q2

48 g13He at constant Q2

49 g13He at constant Q2

50 1 in the resonance region
Extract the neutron from effective polarization equation: Pn=86% Pp=-2.8% Statistical errors only

51 Test of Duality on Neutron and 3He
Used method defined by N. Bianchi, A. Fantoni and S. Liuti on g1p Get g1 at constant Q2 Define integration range in the resonance region in function of W Integrate g1res and g1dis over the same x-range and at the same Q2 PRD 69 (2004) If  duality is verified

52 Test of duality on 3He Statistical errors only

53 Test of duality on neutron
Statistical errors only

54 Spin asymmetries In the parton model:
 and  depend on kinematic variables D and d depend on R=L/ T for 3He In the parton model: If Q2 dependence similar for g1 and for F1  weak Q2 dependence of A1

55 A13He

56 A13He

57 A13He Statistical errors only

58 A13He Statistical errors only

59 A13He Statistical errors only

60 A13He Statistical errors only

61 Summary E provides precision data of Spin Structure Functions on neutron (3He) in the resonance region for 1.0<Q2<4.0(GeV/c)2 Direct extraction of g1 and g2 from our data Overlap between E resonance data and DIS data First precise test of Quark-Hadron Duality for neutron and 3He SSF Global duality seems to work for g1 for all our Q2 Too early to draw conclusions on A1 behavior. E data combined with proton data test of spin and flavor dependence of duality Our data can also be used to extract moments of SSF (e.g. Extended GDH Sum Rule, BC Sum Rule)

62 Jlab at 12 GeV

63 Extra Slides

64 Systematics Target density polarization 1.0-2.0% 3.0-4.0% Beam charge
energy 1.0% 3.0% 0.5% N2 dilution % Detector efficiencies 2.5% Acceptance % Radiative corrections ?

65 A23He

66 Particle identification performance
/e reduced by 104 and electron efficiency kept above 98%

67 NMR: water calibration
NMR analysis done by Vince Sulkosky

68 Elastic asymmetry Check of the product:

69 Nitrogen cross sections
Modified the QFS model by adding energy dependence to the cross sections


Download ppt "Patricia Solvignon Temple University"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google