Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Materials and Methodology
INHIBITORY ACTIVITY OF POSTBIOTIC PRODUCED BY LAB USING RECONSTITUTED MEDIA SUPPLEMENTED WITH INULIN K. Y. Kareem1,5, Loh, T. C.1, 2, Foo, H. L.3, 4 Asmara, A.1, Akit, H.1 and Abdulla. N. R.1,5 1Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia 2Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. 3Department of Bioprocess Technology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.4Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. 5Department of Animal Resource, University of salah al-din, Erbil, Iraq. Corresponding Introduction The act of feeding antibiotics to livestock has been practiced for over fifty years (Choe et. al., 2013). However, the use of antibiotics has been criticized for having negative impacts on animal production and health as it could have residual effects on tissues long after withdrawal and microbial resistance. The bacteria considered as the main cause for food poisoning are L. monocytogenes, Campylobacter, Salmonella, and pathogenic E. coli. Because of these consequences, there is increasing public awareness and pressure to search for alternatives to antibiotics (McCartney, 2002). Prebiotics, probiotics, postbiotics, and synbiotics are common natural feed additives recently used in poultry industries to promote the immune response and the performance of birds. Postbiotics are substances produced in the final or intermediate stage of metabolic process in Lactic acid bacteria (LAB), while prebiotics are defined as indigestible carbohydrates that leave a desired effect on the host by selective growth stimulation or activation of one or more beneficial bacteria in gut (Gibson and Roberfroid,1995). The objective of this study is to determine the inhibitory activity of postbiotic produced by 6 strains of L. plantarum using reconstituted media supplemented with different levels of inulin (a prebiotic) and to select the best combination based on the modified inhibitory activity against pathogens and an indicator bacterium. Materials and Methodology Postbiotic Two fold serial dilution of postbiotic, using sterile NaCl 0.85% (w/v) (20-2 5) Inoculate 20 μL of postbiotic into the prepunched agar plate Let the postbiotic diffuse for 1-2hrs at room temperature Overlay the agar plates with 3ml of soft agar seeded with 1% (v/v) indicator Incubate at 30 ̊C for 24hrs The highest dilution factor with the clear zone was measured and the modified bacteriocin activity was calculated based on the formula as below Agar well diffusion assay Production of postbiotics Reconstituted media for RG11, RG14, RI11, UL4, TL1 and RS5 were prepared Different level of inulin was added & mixed 0.2 % (w/v), 0.4 % (w/v), 0.6 % (w/v), 0.8 % (w/v) and 1.0 % (w/v) Autoclave at 1180C, 15min. Fermented by L. plantarum strains respectively Modified bacteriocin activity (MAU/ml) = * diameter of zone (mm) The highest dilution factor Incubate at 300C for 24hrs Volume of postbiotic (mL) Centrifuge at 10,000 xg, 15min. to obtain the postbiotics 3 Results 3 1 4 1 4 Table 1. Result modified bacteriocin activity (MAU/ml) score rank of top 10 combinations of postbiotics produced by using reconstituted media supplemented with inulin against pathogens 2 5 2 5 Trts. P. Acidilactici VRE L. monocytogenese S. enterica E. coli Score4 MAU/mL Rank3 Rank P31.I52 ±133.33a 1 ±88.88a 2240.0±0.00bc 3 433.33±3.33g 7 _ 6 162 P3.I6 7200.0±0.00bc 4 ±88.88cd 5 ±53.33a 157 P2.I5 ±0.00ab 2 ±26.66d 193.33±1.66k 12 154 P2.I1 186.66±1.66k 13 153 P3.I1 ±133.33c ±88.88bc ±53.33c 380.0±0.00hi 9 152 P3.I4 ±88.88f ±53.33b 386.66±3.33f 8 151 P3.I2 6800.0±0.00cde 150 P2.I6 ±133.33b 1120.0±0.00de 149 P2.I3 ±133.33b ±26.66de 170.0±0.00l 14 148 P4.I5 ±0.00d 10 ±26.66g 446.66±3.33f 3 1 4 2 5 Figure 1: Inhibitory activity of postbiotic produced by LAB using reconstituted media supplemented with inulin against P. acidilactici Discussion The inhibitory effect, exhibited the postbiotics and inulin combinations which were observed by the formation of clear and distinct zones around the wells, may be due to the presence of several antimicrobial compounds such as bacteriocins or organic acids (Labioui et. al., 2005). Bacteriocin from L. plantarum is a natural antimicrobial compound capable of inhibiting the growth of pathogens at molecular and cellular levels. fermentation of inulin and FOS leads to a considerable production of organic acids. It is also able to increase acidification of gut contents (Yang et. al., 2009). a-o Means (mean of modified bacteriocin activity ± SEM) in the same column with common superscripts are non-significantly different. 1P1-P6=different postbiotics (RG11,RG14,RI11,UL4,TL1 and RS5), which were numbered 1,2,3,4,5,6. 2I1-I6=Inulin levels (0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1%). 3Rank of modified bacteriocin activity against single indicator strain, 4Score is the sum of single indicator score as a subtraction of 36 and rank number (score=36-rank). The treatment with higher score has stronger inhibitory activity against 5 above-mentioned indicator strains. It was arranged in descending order in the column. Trts. (treatments) Conclusion The combinations have a stronger inhibitory activity than the postbiotic alone due to the synergistic effect of postbiotic and inulin. The results of this study show that postbiotics and inulin supplementation enable to inhibit proliferation of pathogenic bacteria. Among the 36 treatments, P3.I5, P3.I6, and P2.I5 showed a higher level of modified bacteriocin activity Acknowledgements References This project was supported by Long-Term Research Grant Scheme (LRGS) from Ministry of Education Malaysia. Choe, D., Foo H., Loh T., Hair-Bejo, M. and Awis, Q Inhibitory Property of Metabolite Combinations Produced from Lactobacillus plantarum Strains. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science, 36: McCartney, A Application of molecular biological methods for studying probiotics and the gut flora. Br J Nutr, 88:29–37. Gibson, G. R., and Roberfroid, M. B Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota. Introducing the concept of prebiotic. J Nutr, 125:1401–1412. Labioui, H., Elmoualdi, L., El Yachioui, M. and Ouhssine, M Sélection de souches de bactéries lactiques antibactériennes. Bull Soc Pharm Bordeaux, 144:237–250. Yang, Y., Iji, P. and Choct, M Dietary modulation of gut microflora in broiler chickens: a review of the role of six kinds of alternatives to in-feed antibiotics. Worlds Poult Sci J, 65:97–114. Project leader: Prof. Dr. Loh Teck Chwen Tel: Fax: Expertise: Animal Feed Additive/Animal Nutrition/Swine Production
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.