Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJohn Walsh Modified over 6 years ago
1
A Fractal Thinker Looks at Learning, Observing and Assessing
Ed Nuhfer, Center for Teaching and Learning, Idaho State University
2
KS 20 “…a generator?”
3
KS 20, 21 philosophy, 22 philosophy/assessment
4
The brain learns by building and stabilizing neural connections (see Leamnson, 1999). Some practices make sense from this standpoint; some just do not.
5
All learning produces complex interconnected
affective and cognitive synaptic “wiring.”
7
Concept of a Knowledge Survey
1. = I have insufficient knowledge to answer this question. 2. = I have partial knowledge or know where to quickly (20 minutes or less) obtain a complete answer to this question. 3. = I can fully answer this question with my present knowledge.
8
Split-halves tests of knowledge surveys always show high reliability of pre- and post- measures and changes. R (Spearman-Brown) =.98 pre- and 0.96 post-. KS 23 tests?
9
Pre-course surveys offer useful affective information
Confidence Rating -->
11
Pedagogy: Formative Surveys
These look for useful teaching traits and the degree to which each is visible to students. Good reliability provides a “pedagogical fingerprint” Multiple measures of specifics without global generalizations Can monitor change Firmly grounded in the research
12
“pedagogical practices”
A way to document “pedagogical practices” Look for employment of practices that research shows are useful to students’ learning. Use multiple measures (rather than a single global item). Many tools--formative surveys, SGID, SMTs, CATs.
13
KS 15 an invention? 18 ct courses?
14
Change in Levels of Thinking through a Curriculum
KS 17hs/college, 19 coord?
15
Is the course appropriately challenging? Once it is over,
how did students do across different levels of challenge? KS 16
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.