Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

LAW 221: INTERNATIONAL LAW

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "LAW 221: INTERNATIONAL LAW"— Presentation transcript:

1 LAW 221: INTERNATIONAL LAW
Dr. Başak Çalı

2 Outline History of IL: continued Is international law ‘law’?
Enforcement of international law Outline

3 Where were we?

4 The beginnings of modern IL
Expansion of European powers to the rest of the world The creation of jurisdictional entities in Europe The beginnings of modern IL

5 Vattel ( )

6 Vattel (1714-1767) The Law of Nations (1758)
A central text of classical positivism There is natural law, but only sovereign states can decide what it is. (Compare with Goldsmith and Posner -2006) Absolute sovereignty paradigm in IL Potential problems? Vattel ( )

7 How to interpret IL?

8 The problem of moving goal-posts
If only states know what the international law is, how do we know what international law is? But traditional positivism still struck a chord in IL jurisprudence. The problem of moving goal-posts

9 Positivist v. natural law accounts of International Law
An epic battle?

10 An epic battle? Natural law-based views of IL
State Sovereignty makes sense as part of a larger web of values. There are moral limits to sovereignty of each and every state - consent does not always matter. Positivist views Sovereignty is an independent value Sovereign acts of states define the scope of international law and the limits to sovereignty – consent always matters

11 19th century Expansion of IL to China and the Ottoman Empire
Balance of power in Europe: war is lawful means to achieve political ends The notion of ‘family of nations’ and the distinction between civilised and non-civilised states 1863: The creation of the ICRC 1885: Berlin Conference: the creation of African states 1899: Hague Law: limits on means and methods of warfare 19th century

12 Membership of the League of Nations: 1920-46

13 League of Nations Covenant
THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES, In order to promote international co-operation and to achieve international peace and security by the acceptance of obligations not to resort to war, by the prescription of open, just and honourable relations between nations, by the firm establishment of the understandings of international law as the actual rule of conduct among Governments, and by the maintenance of justice and a scrupulous respect for all treaty obligations in the dealings of organised peoples with one another, Agree to this Covenant of the League of Nations. League of Nations Covenant

14 Big Break: The League of Nations – 1919-46
The creation of the ILO (1919) The first individual petition mechanism at an international organisation The mandate system: transfer of authority to an international organisation Permanent Court of International Justice: first ever international court (1920) Big Break: The League of Nations –

15 The Manchurian and Abyssinian crises (1932 & 1935)
The start of the Second World War (1939) States start pulling out of the League of Nations President Woodrow Wilson failed to get the League of Nations Treaty through US Congress The League of Nations

16 Contemporary IL

17 Contemporary IL Sovereign states are still here.
Vattel’s views continue to carry weight, BUT: There are very wide ranging and –at times- deep international laws. The skeptic sees the Vattel everywhere The optimist points at the myriad of laws that have come about, especially since 1945. The well-informed knows that some areas of international law are stronger than others both in terms of content and enforcement. Contemporary IL

18 Is international law ‘law’?
Why would someone ask this question? Is international law ‘law’?

19 The question is at once odd and important
It is odd because, there are so many international laws around in year 2013 and these laws have real consequences. It is important because international law is still different from domestic law The question is at once odd and important

20 Is international law ‘law’?
To ask this question someone must: already have a definition of law think that international law does not fit into that definition Is international law ‘law’?

21 John Austin

22 Austin’s three propositions
Law is the command of a sovereign Commands are backed up by sanctions Law as command of sovereign - backed up by sanctions – attracts obedience Austin’s three propositions

23 Next Week: Sources of IL
No LECTURE NEXT MONDAY. For Lecture NEXT WED: Read pages AND Chapter on Treaties AND the Vienna Convention on the Law of the Treaties. Bring your VCTL with you to class. There is also a lecture NEXT Thursday. Next Week: Sources of IL

24 GOLD DUST CASE 1: 2 October at 5 pm


Download ppt "LAW 221: INTERNATIONAL LAW"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google