Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Interpretation of the antibiogram : from the lab to the bedside

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Interpretation of the antibiogram : from the lab to the bedside"— Presentation transcript:

1 Interpretation of the antibiogram : from the lab to the bedside
Maria Virginia Villegas , MD, MSc,FIDSA Scientific Director Bacterial Resistance and Hospital Epidemiology Research Area International Center for Medical Research and Training, Cali, Colombia CIDEIM

2 MECHANISMS OF RESISTANCE IN GRAM (-) BACTERIA
Peleg AY, Hooper DC. Hospital-acquired infections due to gram-negative bacteria. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13

3 MECHANISMS OF RESISTANCE IN GRAM (-) BACTERIA
Cephalosporins slower diffusion due to bulk and ionic charges Imipenem Rapid diffusion due to small size and zwitterionic (+/-) charge Outer Membrane (Lipopolysaccharide mutated or missing D2 porin OmpF OmpC Periplasmic Space efflux pump This represents a graphic of the periplasmic space and the target sites for antimicrobial activity in gram-negative organisms. Also identified are the penetration methods for the various antibiotics depicted. Special thanks to Rich Reinert for this slide. beta lactamases (hydrolyzing enzymes) penicillin binding proteins Inner Membrane (Phosolipid) PBP1b PBP3 PBP2 PB1a

4 Mechanisms of Resistance in Gram (-) Bacteria
Altered permeability to antibiotics Changes in the Outer Membrane and Porins Efflux Target changes ( PBP, Ribosome, DNA ) Beta-lactamase production Torres JA, Villegas MV, Quinn JP. Current concepts in antibiotic-resistant gram negative bacteria. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2007; 5(5): - Briceño DF, Ruiz SJ, Villegas MV. Resistencia a antimicrobianos, Enfermedades Infecciosas CIB, 7º Edición. 2011

5 P.aeruginosa Amikacin S Gentamicina R Cefoperazone/S R Ceftazidime S
Cefepime S Imipenem R Ciprofloxacina S Meropenem S Doripenem S Pip/tazobactam S

6 OprD and P.aeruginosa

7 Different Porins and its role in Resistance
Figure: Livermore/ pg 1 OprD selective for carbapenems Cefalosphorins Porin Outer membrane This diagram depicts the entry of various carbapenems into a bacterium. Through the OprD (initially called D2 porin) and its subsequent interaction with penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) on the surface of the inner cytoplasmic membrane, P aeruginosa resistance typically invovles loss of OprD (seen here) and over expression of the efflux pump system (not depicted). Reference: 1. Livermore MD. The microbiology of ertapenem, a new carbapenem. Infections in Oncology. 2001;5(3):1–5. PBP4 PBP7 PBP1 PBP2 PBP3 Cytoplasmic membrane Penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) Livermore DM. Infections in Oncology. 2001;5:1–5.

8 P.aeruginosa Amikacin S Gentamicina R Cefoperazone/S R Ceftazidime S
Cefepime S Imipenem S Ciprofloxacina S Meropenem R Doripenem S Pip/tazobactam S

9 Efflux Transporter (AcrB)
Efflux pumps Figure: Nikaido pg 216 OM Channel (TolC) Porin Outer Leaflet (LPS) Outer Membrane Inner Leaflet Periplasmic Accessory Protein (AcrA) Periplasm Efflux pumps play an important role in the multidrug resistance of P aeruginosa and Acinetobacter. Efflux pumps can remove a wide range of antibiotic drugs from Gram-negative bacteria [Aeschlimann/ pg 916/ A].1 All efflux pump systems are energy-dependent (ie, proton motive force-driven) and they consist of an exporter protein located in the cytoplasmic membrane, a gated outer membrane protein (also called porin) located in the outer membrane, and a membrane fusion protein (linker protein) that links the exporter protein with the outer membrane channel protein [Aeschlimann/ pg 917/ A]. 1 Antibiotics can be captured from the periplasm, the cytoplasmic membrane, and/or the cytoplasmic space by the exporter protein [Aeschlimann/ pg 917/ C]. 1 The accessory proteins serve as a conduit between the cytoplasmic membrane and the outer membrane. Gated outer membrane proteins (porin) serve as the final step in the removal of the antibiotic from the cell [Aeschlimann/ pg 917/ C].1 References: Aeschlimann JR. The role of multidrug efflux pumps in the antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Gram-negative bacteria. Pharmacotherapy. 2003;23:916–924. Nikaido H. Preventing drug access to targets: Cell surface permeability barriers and active efflux in bacteria. Semin Cell Dev Biol ;12:215–23. Inner Membrane Efflux Transporter (AcrB) Nikaido H. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2001;12:215–23.

10 Eflux pumps

11 Acinetobacter baumannii
Susceptibility: amikacina R cefepime R ceftazidime R tigeciclina R ampicilina/sulb R meropenem R imipenem R >8 R amikacina R

12 “A.baummanii resistant Island
45 resistant genes for : Aminoglicosydes Tetracyclin Cotrimoxazol Chloramphenicol Betalactams (VEB-1, OXA-10) Sulfonamides These genes belongued to other Gram (-) bacteria like Pseudomonas sp., Salmonella sp., y E. coli. AbaR1-10! Fournier, P. E., D. Vallenet, V. Barbe, S. Audic, H. Ogata, L. Poirel, H.Richet, C. Robert, S. Mangenot, C. Abergel, P. Nordmann, J. Weissenbach,D. Raoult, and J. M. Claverie Comparative genomics of multidrug resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS Genet. 2:e7.

13 BETA-LACTAMASE CLASSIFICATION Bush – Jacoby - Medeiros
Group Characteristics Representative Enzymes 1 2a 2b 2be 2br 2c 2d 2e 2f 3 4 Cafalosporinases not- inhibited by Clav acid ( C.A) Penicilinases inhibted by C.A Broad spectrum B-lactamases inh by C.A Extended spectrum B-lactamases inhibited by C.A (ESBLs) Broad spectrum B-lactamases with reduced Af to Inhs (IRTs) Carbenicilinases inhibited by C.A Cloxacilinases inhibited by C.A Cefalosporinases inhibited by C.A Carbapenemases non metallo b -lactamases Metallo b – lactamases Penicilinases not- inhibited by C.A AmpC PC1 (S. aureus) TEM-1, TEM-2, SHV-1 TEM , SHV-2 - 6 TEM , TRC-1 PSE-1, CARB-3 OXA-1, PSE-2 P. Vulgaris IMI-1, NMC-A, Sme-1 L1 (Sten. maltophilia) P. cepacia

14 Enterobacter cloacae Amikacina S Ampicilina R Cefazolina S
Ceftazidime S Cefepime S Ceftriaxone S Gentamicin S Levofloxacin S

15 Amp C B-lactamases Hydrolyze 3rd generation cefalosphorins and
B-lactamase Inhibitors A Aereomonas/ A.baumannii M Morganella P Providencia/P.aeruginosa C Citrobacter freundii ● E Enterobacter ● S Serratia

16 AmpC de-repression Lister PD. et al. Clinical microbiology reviews, Oct. 2009, p. 582–610

17 Selecting Enterobacter R to 3rd gen cephs during Rx
Rx included Selection (49) No selection (428) Pen/ampicillin 44.9% 43.05 1 gen cephs 24.5% 26.9% 3 gen cephs 63.3% 30.4% (P<0.001) Imipenem 16.3% 8.2% (NS) Pip/tazo 10.2% 8.2% Amp/sulb 26.5% 28.5% Kaye et al. AAC 2001, 45, 2628

18 Selecting Enterobacter R to 3rd gen cephs during Rx
Kaye et al. AAC 2001, 45, 2628; Cosgrove et al. Arch Intern Med 2002, 162, 185

19 Prevalence of de-represion
Varies with time, place and patient 30-40% of Enterobacter spp & C. freundii 10-20% of M. morganii ● There is no way to predict it from the micro lab ● Phenotype : resistance to 3rd gen cephalosporins and Pip/taz, but S to Cefepime and Carbapenems.

20 Klebsiella pneumoniae
Amikacin S Ampicillin R Cefazolin R Ceftazidime S/R Cefepime S/R Ceftriaxone R/S Ertapenem S Meropenem S Levofloxacin S Pip/tazobactam S/R

21 ESBLs B-lactamases 3rd gen cephalosporins and Aztreonam.
● Hydrolyze 3rd gen cephalosporins and Aztreonam. ● Lab can diagnose an ESBL in Klebsiella, E.coli & Proteus but they can be found in any Gram (-) ● Plasmids can carry genes that confer resistance to : Chloramfenicol Aminoglycosides Tetracyclines TMP – S Quinolones.

22 ESBLs : plasmid mediated
Transposons: (mobile genetic elements) Transferable Plasmid carries genetic information, including codes for various resistance factors beta-lactamase resistance genes coding for Figure developed from: Livermore/ pg S13/ A; pg s14/ A; Jacoby; pg 1700/ A This slide illustrates plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance, which includes genes for ESBL production/regulation and aminoglycoside modification (multiresistance) [Livermore/ pg S13/ A; pg S14/ A].2 Resistance factors other than those for ESBLs may reside on the transferable plasmids observed in enterobacteriaceae. The plasmids tend to be large (80 kb) and carry variable resistance to different antimicrobial agents [Jacoby/ pg 1700/ A]. Plasmids encoding ESBLs may carry numerous antibiotic-resistance genes [Jacoby/ 1700/ A].1 Transposons are genetic elements that may encode ESBL production or other resistance and can replicate and reinsert into other plasmids or a host chromosome, thus spreading resistance [Livermore/ pg S13/ A].2 References: 1. Jacoby GA, Medeiros AA. More extended-spectrum b-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother ;35:1697–1704. 2. Livermore DM. Bacterial resistance: Origins, epidemiology, and impact. Clin Infect Dis ;36:S11–S23. 1. Jacoby. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2. Livermore DM. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36(Suppl 1):S11–23.

23 Mortality among 60 patients with ESBL producing Klebsiella Bacteremia
Paterson DL. CID 2004

24 Carbapenamases Enzyme Classification Most Common Bacteria Class A
(serine-b-lactamase) KPC, SME, IMI, NMC, GES Enterobacteriaceae (less common in P. aeruginosa) Class B (metallo-b-lactamase) IMP, VIM, GIM, SPM NDM P. aeruginosa Enterobacteriacea Acinetobacter spp. Class D OXA ( less common in Enterobacteriacea)

25 Klebsiella pneumoniae
Amikacin S/R Tygecicline S/R Fosfomycin S/R Ceftazidime R Ceftaz/avibactam S Ceftriaxone R Ertapenem R Meropenem S/R Levofloxacin S/R Pip/tazobactam R

26 Modified Hodge Test POSITIVE NEGATIVE

27 Observational Studies Associating Therapy and Clinical Outcome Bacteremia Caused by KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Study (Year) Treatment (# of patients) Mortality Daikos et al. ( ) Greece Combination Therapy (n=103) Carbapenem-containing (n=31) Carbapenem-sparing (n=72) Monotherapy (n=72) 27.2%a 19.3% 30.6% 44.4%a For carbapenem-containing combinations; mortality higher for MIC >8 mg/L (35.5%) vs 8 mg/L (19.3%) a 28-day mortality rate; P = 0.003 Colistin and meropenem generally given at higher doses (270 mg/day and 6 g/day, respectively) Daikos GL, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58:

28 In Summary The interpretation of the mechanisms of resistance in an Antibiogram will help the clinician to : 1. Select the righ antibiotic 2. Decrease the patients morbility and mortality 3. Build Antibiotic Guidelines according to the hospital data 4. Implement strategies through the ID committee in order to contain the MDR bacteria 5. Decrease hospital costs


Download ppt "Interpretation of the antibiogram : from the lab to the bedside"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google