Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
SEWER SERVICE FEE RATE STRUCTURE ALTERNATIVE
March 26, 2012 WORKSHOP SEWER SERVICE FEE RATE STRUCTURE ALTERNATIVE
2
The Wastewater System 59 miles of pipe 2 pump stations
Large portion: 50+ years old Serves 5,170 homes and businesses WW conveyed from private laterals to sewer mains to treatment plant
3
Why Was a 2011 Rate Increase Necessary?
Protect Public Health & Environment Higher Operating Costs to Meet Tighter Environmental Standards Renew Aging Infrastructure Higher SASM Treatment Fees
4
Revenue Requirement Projections
Projected Costs City Operating Costs $ ,000 $ ,000 $ ,000 $ ,000 $ ,000 $ ,000 SASM Treatment Costs $ 1,459,000 $ ,675,000 $ ,843,000 $ ,027,000 $ 2,074,000 $ 2,122,000 EPA Compliance Costs $ $ ,000 $ ,000 $ ,000 $ ,000 $ ,000 Capital Improvements $ ,000 $ ,180,000 $ ,510,000 $ ,310,000 $ 1,310,000 $ 1,380,000 Reserves $ ,000 $ ,000 $ ,000 Total $ 2,728,000 $ ,039,000 $ 4,558,000 $ 4,553,000 $ 4,612,000 $ 4,611,000
5
Capital Improvements Sewer rehabilitation construction
Largest increase is to accelerate CIP $2,500,000 per year recommended
7
CIP Work Plan Examples
8
Current Rate Structure
Ordinance 1250 increased fees by 102% for 2011/12 and set annual rates through 2016/17 Single family dwelling units: $600 for 2011/12 2nd Dwelling Units charged 0.67 of single-family dwelling unit Fee= 0.67 x 600 = $402
9
Single Family Residential Customer
Adopted Sewer Charges Current Fixed-Rate Basis Fiscal Year: Prior 6 Years Residential Sewer Service Charge per dwelling unit $297 $600 $677 $685 Percent Increase None 102% 13% 0% 1%
10
Alternative Fee Structure Study
Council adopted rates and directed immediate study of flow-based residential rates Alternative rates structure objectives Encourage conservation Provide greatest equity for customers Achieve simplicity and transparency Improve predictability regarding: Costs to customers, and; Revenues to City
11
Proposed Flow-Based Rates
Charge per hundred cubic feet of water use Marin Municipal Water District meter readings used because sewer flows are not metered Single and multi family – based on winter water use Commercial – winter/summer average Minimum charge for all customers
12
Single Family FY12-13 Flow-Based Bills
13
Proposed Rate Summary
14
Single Family Residential Bill Impacts
15
Commercial FY 11-12 Bill Impacts
16
Multi Family Residential Bill Impacts
17
Current Provision for Financial Hardship
Based on economic need eligibility for PG&E CARE program Provides a fee credit of 25%
18
Next Steps Finalize model
Present recommendation to Council at April 2, 2012 meeting Council authorizes initiating Prop 218 public-notice process Public hearing to adopt rate increase June 18, 2012 Charges placed on tax rolls August 6, 2012
19
Questions & Answers
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.