Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMarian Wilkins Modified over 6 years ago
1
Transitioning Welsh EIA to the amended Directive 2014/52/EU
6 October 2016
2
Speakers Josh Fothergill - IEMA Hywel Butts – Welsh Government You?
4
Outline Welcome EIA Directive Context – Josh
Wale’s EIA Consultation – Owen Discussions Process Refreshments Quality Other Issues Summary & IA News Update - Josh
5
EIA Directive Context Josh Fothergill Policy Lead IEMA
6
Revisions to EU EIA Directive (1985 – 2014)
Time-limit for transposition 85/337/EEC 3 July 1988 97/11/EC – Amendment 14 March 1999 2003/35/EC – Amendment 25 June 2005 2009/31/EC – Amendment 25 June 2011 2011/92/EU Consolidation No transposition required 2014/52/EU – Amendment 16 May 2017
7
Overview: Revising the EIA Directive
EC proposals for revising EIA Directive EIA Directive amendment 2014/52/EU EC Public Consultation 2010 2012 2014 2013 2009 2011 2016 2017 EU EIA Effectiveness Review New EIA Directive Proposal Revised by EU Parliament & Council Member State transposition [by May 2017] 2011/92/EU
8
2014/52/EU European Commission Goals
Core Rule: Maintain the level of environmental protection established within the existing EIA Directive Three Aims to drive Effective EIA: Harmonisation between Member States Efficiency to streamline multiple EU assessments & reduce burdens Quality moving away from a purely procedural focus in EIA laws Also: Improve consideration of Climate Change and Biodiversity in EIA
9
2014/52/EU Significant Scale of Change
10
Challenges Balancing the EC’s goals: Harmonisation, Efficiency, Quality Lack of definitions in amended Directive (experts, health, reasonable alternatives) = Risk to Harmonisation Changing words in legislation will not easily erode established culture in EIA practices = Risk to Efficiency Adverse approach to amendment process by some Member States (monitoring, ecosystem services) = Risk to Quality
11
Transposition - Progress
EU Member States Complete: Bulgaria, (Poland) 2016: Luxembourg, Cyprus, Slovenia 2017: UK, Sweden, (Poland) Within UK Scotland: Consulting now on 8/11 EIA regimes Wales: Consulting now on T&CP EIA regime England and Northern Ireland: Awaiting consultations
12
Member Views “Much of this is already good practice” “Avoid undue burden” “An opportunity to streamline” “How will x,y,z… work in practice?”
13
Avoiding undue Burden The changing requirements will add / extend tasks… How do we enable this efficiently? Local Authority - Process changes (screen, scope, examination) Developer - Topics (CC & Health) and Monitoring More complex as: Only T&CP EIA regime consultation
14
Opportunity to… Streamline EIA
Amendments provide context for a change in EIA… Recognise EIA regulations acting alone could backfire Co-ordinated EIA and other assessments EIA Report ‘based on’ scoping opinion Limiting assessment only to significant effects Pleased to see: Funding scoping training across LPA & CBs
15
Develop a culture of proportionate assessment across the EIA community in Wales
16
How will xxxxxxx work in practice?
Competent Experts Screening Scoping Monitoring More complex as: no draft EIA Regulations set out in the consultation
17
Guidance will be crucial - Provides need to work together
18
Hywel Butts Planning Directorate Welsh Government
19
Environmental Impact Assessment
Transposition of Directive 2014/52/EU for Town and Country Planning Hywel Butts Head of Development Management Branch Planning Directorate Welsh Government
20
Overview Background to the new Directive 2014/52 Brexit
Consultation on transposition proposals Other amendments Your views - Workshop session
21
Background to the new Directive 2014/52/EU
Commission’s Review of the effectiveness of the EIA Directive Proposal to lighten administrative burdens and prepare for emerging challenges Negotiations lead to Directive of May 2014 Transposition required by 16 May 2017
22
Transposition so far… 2016 Regulations in Wales
UK wide inter-government cooperation Stakeholder engagement
23
Brexit Rio Declaration on Environment and Development
The Espoo Convention The Aarhus Convention
24
Consultation E Proposed changes to how Environmental Impact Assessment applies to Town and Country Planning Responses by 11/11/2016
25
Areas with little discretion
Examples Introduction of more specific information that developers will have to provide at the screening stage (Annex IIA; Art.4(3)) New phrases, e.g. Human health (Annex II; Art 4(3)) Information included in the ES “a description of the reasonable alternatives studied by the developer” Includes alternatives including re: project design, technology, location, size and scale (Annex IV, para.2)
26
Areas with little discretion od
Our proposals The use of ‘Copy out’ The role of guidance
27
Co-ordination od Provide coordinated and/or joint procedures where projects fall to be assessed simultaneously under the EIA, Habitats and Birds Directives (Directives 2011/92/EU, 92/43/EEC and 2009/147/EC respectively)(Art. 2(3)) The option to include other Directives, such as Water Framework, IED, Waste Framework, Seveso (Art. 2(3))
28
Co-ordination od Our proposals Co-ordinated not joint assessment
What should we co-ordinate: Screening? Scoping? The environmental information? The decision? Single and multi regime consents
29
Consultation and participation
Article 6(2) requires the public to be informed electronically of the application and how to participate in the decision making process Article 6(5) requires that the relevant information (application and ES) is also available electronically through at least a central portal or easily accessible points of access Article 6(7) has required that the public consultation on the ES should last for at least 30 days
30
Consultation and participation
Our proposals The LPA to publicise and make the application and ES available online Paper and electronic copies to be submitted to help achieve these processes
31
Monitoring of significant effects
The decision to grant development consent should include, where appropriate, monitoring measures (new Art. 8a(4)) Member States have freedom to determine the procedures regarding the monitoring of significant adverse environmental effects (new Art. 8a(4))
32
Monitoring of significant effects
Our proposals Impose a general requirement on the LPA, or Welsh Ministers to include monitoring measures where appropriate, leaving it to their discretion as to what factors should be monitored and for how long Use the existing system of planning conditions and obligations The need for proportionality
33
Conflict of interest and functional separation
Competent authorities perform the duties of the EIA Directive in an objective manner and do not find themselves in a situation giving rise to a conflict of interest (New Art. 9a) Where the competent authority is also the developer there shall be an appropriate separation between functions (New Art. 9a)
34
Conflict of interest and functional separation
Our proposals Existing provisions. Clarify when any authority has a duty under the EIA Regulations they must take any steps to ensure they do so in an objective manner Provide where the developer and the relevant authority are the same person, the relevant authority must ensure a functional separation between those persons seeking development consent and those responsible for determining whether development consent should be granted
35
Penalties and enforcement
The 2014 EIA Directive requires that Member States shall lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive. The penalties thus provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive (New Art. 10a)
36
Penalties and enforcement
Our proposals Provision of false information If someone intentionally provided false or misleading information, intending by doing so to make a gain, this would constitute the offence of fraud by false representation. Fraud is covered by criminal law
37
Penalties and enforcement
Our proposals Unlawful development Reinforce the existing caselaw through an explicit duty on LPAs to consider if the requirements and objectives of the EIA Directive have been met when they are considering taking enforcement action
38
Competent experts The developer must ensure that their ES is prepared by competent experts (Art.5(3)(a)); and, The competent authority ensures that it has, or has access as necessary to, sufficient expertise to examine the ES(Art.5(3)(b))
39
Competent experts Our proposals
The ES must be prepared by persons who by virtue of their qualifications or experience have in the opinion of the competent authority sufficient expertise to ensure the completeness and quality of the ES
40
Competent experts Our proposals
Require the competent authority to have access to sufficient expertise to examine the ES In house expertise or external ‘bought in services’ if required
41
Other amendments Third party screening requests Scoping timeframes
Purchase notices under Section 141 of the TCPA
42
Your views….. Consultation at www.gov.wales/consultations/
closes: 11/11/2016
43
Insert Owen’s Slides here…
44
Ice Breaker My biggest concern is…
45
Discussion 1 EIA Process Changes, e.g. Screening Scoping Monitoring
46
Refreshments
47
Discussion 2 EIA Quality Changes, e.g. Experts & Expertise
Joint / Co-ordinated Assessments New Topics Annex 4: Reasonable Alternatives
48
Discussion 3 Other Issues
49
Summary & IA News Update
50
Thank You Josh Fothergill E:
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.