1. Project hammer Cluster C00200 CA - SSO Celcom CA Project 2017-03-15
© Ericsson AB 2016

2. PROJECT BAU MODERNIZATION
CONTENTS
SINR
Throughput Analysis

3. B00666 CA-report – DT KPI overview – 4G
Celcom CA Project
B00666 CA-report – DT KPI overview – 4G #
KPI
Cluster KPI Target
Result
PASS/
Remarks
Celcom
FAIL A
Coverage & Quality A
RSRP (Objective 95%)
95% of the sample
100.00%
Pass A
SINR (Objective >60% of samples >10dB; >95% samples >+5dB)
>=5 95% of the sample
85.05%
Fail
Refer to DT Analysis
>=10 60% of the sample
56.87% A
LTE cell overlapping (LTE1800)
No. of cells within 4dB window: >=4 <2% of area (RSRP>=-105 dbm)
0.63%
No. of cells within 4dB window: >=2 <30% of area (RSRP>=-105 dbm)
29.69%
No. of cell with 10dB window: >=7 <2% of area (RSRP>=-105 dbm)
0.36%
LTE cell overlapping (LTE2600)
0.35%
26.99%
0.06% A
Primary and Secondary Cities A
Download throughput (5Mbps where applicable as per design criteria)
95% of bins in a cluster >= 5Mbps
99.58% A
Upload throughput (250 kbps where applicable as per design criteria)
95% of bins in a cluster >= 250kbps A
Mobility Test (PS Short Call Open mode) A
Network Accessibility Success 50km/h
>=99.5% A
Call Drop 50 km/h
<=0.6%
0.00% A
LTE -> UMTS re-selection success ratio
>=95% A
LTE <-> GSM re-selection success ratio A
Mobility Test (PS Long Call Locked to LTE) A
Download average throughput (long call locked to LTE)
95% of bins in a cluster meeting the throughput as per design A
Upload average throughput (long call locked to LTE) A
Intra-LTE Handover Failure
<= 2% A
CS Services A
CSFB call setup success rate
>=98% A
CSFB Call setup time
95% of samples <=6.5 sec for Mobile-to-Mobile calls
76.81% A
Reselection time back to LTE (after CSFB)
95% <=5 sec
97.10% A
VolTe Call setup success ratio A
Volte MOS
>3.5
3.88 A
VolTe Call drop
<=0.5%
© Ericsson AB 2016

4. PROJECT BAU MODERNIZATION
SINR Analysis

5. lte SINR analysis No dominance cell Summary:
Celcom CA Project
lte SINR analysis A
SINR (Objective >60% of samples >10dB; >95% samples >+5dB)
>=5 95% of the sample
85.05%
Fail
Refer to DT Analysis
>=10 60% of the sample
56.87%
Summary:
1 areas are identified with poor SINR issue, circled as the left.
Area1 PA
Comments 1
No dominance cell
© Ericsson AB 2016

6. LTE SINR analysis 1/1 Analysis:
Celcom CA Project
LTE SINR analysis 1/1
SINR overview
SINR simulation
Analysis:
Target area is in the middle of multiple cells, no cell is shooting directly at this area, site lobe resulting no dominance at this area.
DL THP indicate good throughput in this area, which indicate good end user experience
Simulation plot indicate SINR in this area was almost match with nominal plan.
SINR
RSRP
DL THP
© Ericsson AB 2016

7. PROJECT BAU MODERNIZATION
CSFB analysis

8. CSFB analysis Analysis:
Celcom CA Project
CSFB analysis A
CSFB call setup success rate
>=98%
100.00%
Pass A
CSFB Call setup time
95% of samples <=6.5 sec for Mobile-to-Mobile calls
76.81%
Fail
Refer to DT Analysis A
Reselection time back to LTE (after CSFB)
95% <=5 sec
97.10%
Analysis:
There are 69 times CSFB, and 76.81% of samples CSFB Call Setup time is less than 6.5s.
3. As below graph shows. All call CST are less than 9s.
© Ericsson AB 2016

9. Celcom CA Project
© Ericsson AB 2016