Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Changing Digital Economy: Rise of Platforms

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Changing Digital Economy: Rise of Platforms"— Presentation transcript:

1 The Changing Digital Economy: Rise of Platforms
Vili Lehdonvirta Associate Professor Oxford Internet Institute @ViliLe transaction platforms, not media platforms

2 another way: labour platforms vs. capital platforms
new platforms that mediate between buyers and sellers of services and labour as well as older platforms that mediate between buyers and sellers of goods, whether physical or digital another way: labour platforms vs. capital platforms there used to be a saying, there’s an app for that 5 July 2016

3 Vili Lehdonvirta @ViliLe
5 July 2016

4 http://ilabour.oii.ox.ac.uk/ It’s not all hype
Uber is the biggest labour platform by revenue Ebay and iTunes App Store likewise very significant large market share Vili

5 What is the problem that platforms solve?
Where are they therefore likely to appear? What types of policy issues do they give rise to? fundamental theory from institutional economics that helps us to understand what is the problem that platforms solve and therefore where they are likely to appear, and where not and what types of policy questions they will give rise to are you ready? Vili

6 Player A Cooperate Defect 2, 2 3, 0 0, 3 1, 1 Player B
Prisoners’ dilemma; but instead of prisoners, let’s analyse trade between two rational choosers Vili

7 🚚 , 💶 💶 , 🚚 Buyer Cooperate Defect 🚚+💶, 0 0, 🚚+💶 Seller
Vili

8 🚚 , 💶 💶 , 🚚 Buyer Cooperate Defect 🚚+💶, 0 0, 🚚+💶 Seller social optimum
equilibrium the best outcome is that both cooperate and the trade takes place: social optimum but the tragedy is that the equilibrium outcome in this game, that is the outcome that rational players will end up choosing in a one-off game, is that both defect: no trade takes place *fundamental problem of cooperation* this model can also be used to analyse f2f trade: buyer and seller can exchange the goods and payment simultaneously, but then later the buyer may find out that the goods are defective, or the seller may find out that the cash was forged or the credit card stolen Vili

9 Solutions to the Problem of Cooperation
Reputation Informal reputation in personal networks Third-party enforcement Formal contracts enforced by state = ”Institutions” problems with reputation in personal networks: limited scope: can only trade with people you know not as effective: defection can happen when value of defecting is higher than value of losing one’s reputation; so only really applicable to low-value transactions state institutions: - can trade with strangers! enforcement is costly, so only really applicable to high-value transactions Vili

10 State institutions Personal networks
High-value transactions among strangers Personal networks Low-value transactions among friends ”sharing economy gap” Vili

11 Sharing economy platforms
State institutions High-value transactions among strangers Sharing economy platforms Low-value transactions among strangers Personal networks Low-value transactions among friends technology enables Vili

12 Vili Lehdonvirta @ViliLe
5 July 2016

13 State A’s institutions State B’s institutions
Transactions within state A’s jurisdiction State B’s institutions Transactions within state B’s jurisdiction - there’s a huge rift in the institutional matrix: the gap within states - state institutions only extend as far as state borders do enforcing a contract in another country is costly, enforcement is often biased in favour of locals personal networks also tend to be quite geographically bound Brexit and looming trade wars only widen this gap Vili

14 but these are not open at all; TNCs become gatekeepers
UNCTAD Global Value Chains and Development 2013 because of the transnational gap in public institutions, most cross-border exchange happens within TNCs’ private governance frameworks but these are not open at all; TNCs become gatekeepers 24 June 2016

15 Bridging the transnational gap: eBay
eBay, Inc (2013) Micro-multinationals, global consumers, and the WTO eBay: prime example of how platforms can provide an alternative institutional framework to bridge the transnational gap Almost 150 million active traders today, around $20bn worth of goods annually very international: enforces cooperation via a reputation system like BlaBlaCar and other platforms but also through formal dispute resolution resolves three times as many disputes a year as there are lawsuits filed in the entire US legal system Vili

16 3 billion Internet users
Global online outsourcing platforms connect tens of millions clients and workers World bank estimates: value of projects traded via outsourcing platforms I 2015 $4.8 billion I .. by 2020 $15-25 billion reputation system + online dispute resolution Vili 5 July 2016

17 Solutions to the Problem of Cooperation
Reputation Informal reputation in personal networks Rating systems on platforms Third-party enforcement Formal contracts enforced by state Formal dispute resolution performed by platform Vili

18 State A’s institutions Transnational platforms State B’s institutions
Transactions within state A’s jurisdiction Transnational platforms Transactions across national boundaries State B’s institutions Transactions within state B’s jurisdiction Platforms solve the Problem of Cooperation in places where there is a gap in the society’s existing institutional matrix So if you want to find areas that are ripe for disruption by platforms, find gaps in the matrix, or places where institutions are functioning poorly Vili

19 Platforms solve the Problem of Cooperation.
They are likely to appear where there is a gap in existing institutions. What types of policy issues do they give rise to? fundamental theory from institutional economics that helps us to understand what is the problem that platforms solve and therefore where they are likely to appear, and where not and what types of policy questions they will give rise to are you ready? Vili

20 Edelman, B. , Luca, M. , & Svirsky, D
Edelman, B., Luca, M., & Svirsky, D. (2016) Racial Discrimination in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from a Field Experiment. HBS Working Paper Vili

21 Platforms’ institutional failings
Discrimination Consumer protection Externalities Can the technology be improved? Can national regulators encourage improvement? Also child labour? Forced labour? Back to square one in terms of developing institutions that are safe and fair for everyone? Can national policy makers encourage platforms to improve their technology to address these issues? Vili

22 Rosenblatt, A. & Stark, L. (2016) Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers. International Journal of Communication 10: Vili

23 Platform State institutions
Employees managerial control legal protection Platform Platform workers platform control? no protection? Contractors freedom no protection Firm Firm State institutions Vili

24 Platforms’ policy failings
Labour rights Consumer rights Access How can workers and consumers affect the new rules that bind them? Who makes the rules now? Vili

25 State institutions Platform
usurper / replacer Vili

26 Firm Firm Platform State institutions Vili

27 Potential ways forward
Distinguish between gap-fillers and replacers Go easier on gap-fillers Encourage improvements to address institutional failings Encourage accountability / openness in how the platform sets its policies Don’t hesitate to regulate replacers But also learn from them: why are their institutions winning over people? Vili


Download ppt "The Changing Digital Economy: Rise of Platforms"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google