Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAmbrose Small Modified over 6 years ago
1
High Operating Temperature Split-off Band IR Detectors
Viraj Jayaweera Department of Physics and Astronomy Georgia State University
2
Outline Types of IR Detectors
Difference Between Mechanisms of Other types of detectors and Split-off Detector Detector Structure and Experimental Results Advantages for the Split-off detectors Conclusion
3
Types of Infrared Detectors
IR Detectors Photon Detectors Thermal Detectors Pyroelectric Detectors Bolometer Thermopile Photo Conductive Photovoltaic QWIP (Quantum Well Infrared Photodetectors) DWELL (Quantum Dots-in-a-Well Infrared Photodetectors) T-QDIP (Tunneling Quantum Dot Infrared Photodetectors) HIWIP (Homojunction Interfacial Workfunction Internal Photoemission) HEIWIP (Heterojunction Interfacial Workfunction Internal Photoemission)
4
Detector Mechanisms Intrinsic (InSb, HgCdTe) Quantum Well
Conduction Band E Conduction Band E k k ESO Heavy Hole Band Light Hole Band Heavy Hole Band Light Hole Band Split-off Band Split-off Band Intrinsic (InSb, HgCdTe) Quantum Well
5
Split-off Mechanism IR Photon excites holes from the light/heavy hole bands to the split-off band (Solid Arrow) Excited holes may escape in split-off band or, May scatter into the light/heavy hole bands and then escape (Dashed Arrow) Conduction Band E Transition is entirely in hole bands Carrier energies are continuous not quantized Split-off response is inherently broadband k Ef ΔL/H Heavy Hole Band Light Hole Band ΔSO Split-off Band
6
Response Mechanism I E escape Free Carrier Absorption Light/Heavy Hole Band Split-off Band k EF ΔL/H Heavy Hole Band Light Hole Band ΔSO Split-off Band The photoexcitation process consists of the standard free carrier absorption.
7
Response Mechanism II Light/Heavy Hole Band E k EF ΔL/H Split-off Absorption Heavy Hole Band Light Hole Band scattering ΔSO Split-off Band Split-off Band direct photoabsorption to the split-off band, followed by a scattering to the light/heavy hole band.
8
Response Mechanism III
Light/Heavy Hole Band E k Ef ΔL/H Split-off Absorption Heavy Hole Band Light Hole Band ΔSO Split-off Band Split-off Band escape Single indirect photoabsorption into the split-off band.
9
Response Mechanism IV Light/Heavy Hole Band E k Ef ΔL/H Split-off Absorption Heavy Hole Band escape Light Hole Band scattering ΔSO Split-off Band Split-off Band indirect photoabsorption, followed by a scattering event to the light or heavy hole band.
10
Detector Structure (HE0204)
i p+ hν Δ After processing Substrate ~1000 A Metal p GaAs AlGaAs ++ + n Periods Top Contact Barrier Emitter
11
Detector Structure (HE0204)
400 μm Au contact layers Top Contact p++ GaAs <2.5μm ~1.5mm N Periods GaAs (barrier) p+ GaAs (emitter) Homojunction Heterojunction AlGaAs (barrier) p+ GaAs (emitter) Bottom Contact p++ GaAs Substrate
12
Absorption (HE0204) Absorption Wavelength (mm)
13
Split Off Response (HE0204)
Mechanism III Mechanism II/IV Responsivity (A/W) Wavelength (mm)
14
Quantum Efficiency of Detector “1332”
50K Reducing threshold to 10 µm should increase operating temperature to ~200 K Increasing emitter doping should further increase T
15
Advantages h+ h+ h+ Δ Δ ESO ESO ESO Δ Δ Δ
Increased operating Temperature Use of the split-off band provides increased absorption at short wavelengths Increased escape due to high carrier energies Increased gain due to impact ionization from high energy carriers h+ i p+ h+ i p+ h+ i p+ Δ Δ Dark Current ~e-Δ/kT ESO ESO ESO Δ Δ Δ
16
Advantages Different material will cover different split-off ranges
Antimonides – µm Arsinides – µm Phosphides – µm Nitrides – µm
17
Conclusion SO detector shows improved response
Optimized devices should operate near room temperature for µm detector Use of other materials will allow tailoring of the response range
18
End
19
Advantages over other 3-5 µm detectors
Arsenides will be used for this range Have advantage of allowing integrated electronics Present Detector Advantage Proposed Split-off Detector InSb 77 K Operating Temperature 300 K HgCdTe K ~4% Bad Pixels (256x256) Uniformity ~0.1% Bad Pixels (600x512) PbSe Threshold depends on Temperature Better Stability Threshold fixed by split-off energy
20
Advantages over other 8-14 µm detectors
Phosphides will be used for this range Present Detector Advantage Proposed Split-off Detector Quantum Wells 77 K Narrow Response Operating Temperature Response width 200 K Broadband Response HgCdTe
21
Advantages over other 30-60 µm detectors
Nitrides will be used for this range Nitrides are radiation hard, allowing high background operation Present Detector Advantage Proposed Split-off Detector BIB Detectors 4.2 K Operating Temperature 77 K Ge:Ga Extrinsic Split-off detectors will be much faster than thermal detectors
22
Differences from other approaches
Intrinsic Detectors (InSb, HgCdTe) Transition is entirely in hole bands Quantum Wells Carrier energies are continuous not quantized SO Response is inherently broadband
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.