Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Projects & Wireless Transport

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Projects & Wireless Transport"— Presentation transcript:

1 Projects & Wireless Transport

2 Puzzle You have an unfair coin (prob(H) = p != ½)
Use TH and HT as the two events with equal probability p(1-p). Ignore events TT and HH You have an unfair coin (prob(H) = p != ½) How will you generate a fair toss?

3 Projects 6 projects 1 team (2 students)/project
Doubling up on some projects allowed only after discussions with me Send to me on your top 2 choices before 11.59pm tomorrow (Wednesday) I will resolve conflicts

4 Timeline Projects chosen: September 15th Synopsis: September 21st (1%)
Preliminary presentation: October 26th/28th (4%) Final presentation: November 30th/December 2nd (8%) Final report: December 4th (2%)

5 Project Grading Abstract/Synopsis (1%)
1 page .doc document Preliminary presentation/report (4%) 8 pages .doc document Final presentation/demo/results (8%) Final report (2%) 15 pages .doc document

6 List of Projects Dynamic Spectrum Management (*****)
Information Networking (***) Transport Caching (****) Sensor Network Testbed (***1/2) Web Usage Analysis (**) Literature survey on e-waste and health impacts of Wireless Networking (*)

7 Recap TCP/IP/MAC Overview of wireless systems Wireless MAC
Wireless Scheduling Mobility Support Wireless Transport …

8 Outline TCP over wireless networks
TCP assumptions Wireless network characteristics Impact on TCP performance Approaches to improve TCP performance Link layer approaches TCP-aware link layer approaches Split connection approaches End-to-end approaches TCP over satellite and ad-hoc networks

9 TCP Congestion control Window based Slow start LIMD
Congestion detection Self-clocking Window limitation

10 TCP (Contd.) Reliability Cumulative ACKs DUPACKs and Timeouts
Timeout calculation RTTavg + 4 * RTTmdev Coupling between congestion control and reliability

11 Wireless Networks Wide-area wireless Metropolitan-area wireless
Local-area wireless Ad-hoc wireless Satellite wireless

12 Wireless Characteristics
Low bandwidths 10-20Kbps WWANs, 1-10Mbps WLANs, Kbps satellite Random wireless losses Upto 10% packet loss rates Hand-offs Depending on cell coverage and user mobility (30m/s in an network will result in a hand-off every seconds)

13 Wireless Characteristics (Contd.)
Black-outs Fading, temporary disconnections etc. Can last from a few seconds to less than a minute Large and Varying Delay WWANs have typical RTTs of 400ms and deviations of up-to a few seconds Path asymmetry Reverse path characteristics different from forward path characteristics (e.g. satellite, WWANs)

14 Characteristics (Contd.)
Local-area wireless Frequent hand-offs when mobile Ad-hoc wireless Routers mobile! Frequent disconnections Network partitions? Satellite wireless Large bandwidth delay products (why?)

15 TCP on Wireless – Random Losses
TCP uses losses as indication of congestion Reduces congestion window by half (LIMD) when it experiences congestion Even when no congestion, if packets are dropped due to random losses, TCP will cut down its rate (is this right?)

16 Other Losses TCP will interpret hand-offs related losses also as congestion based losses Hence, it will reduce the congestion window every time hand-offs related losses occur Black-outs will further result in TCP experiencing multiple timeouts of increasing granularity

17 Large and Varying Delay
TCP uses RTTavg + 4 * RTTmdev as the retransmission timeout If there is large variance in delay, mean deviation is high resulting in inflated timeout values Hence, if there are burst losses resulting in a timeout, the sender would take longer time to detect losses and recover

18 Path Asymmetry TCP relies on ACK arrivals for congestion window progression If path asymmetry exists, a TCP connection’s performance will be influenced by the reverse path characteristics also Indirect effects of path asymmetry (ACK bunching)

19 Low Bandwidths TCP uses window based congestion control
If there is free space in the congestion window, TCP will transmit Hence, TCP’s output can be bursty This coupled with the low bandwidths can result in queue build-ups in the network adversely affecting RTT calculations and causing packet drops

20 Large Bandwidth Delay Products
TCP’s header has 16 bits allocated for receiver window advertisement Maximum of 64KB can be advertised Consider a satellite link with 1Mbps bandwidth and 1 second RTT (BDP = 1Mb) But, TCP can only achieve 500Kbps (resulting in only 50% utilization)

21 Slow-start TCP uses slow-start to ramp up rate to the available capacity Whenever timeouts occur, TCP uses slow-start If hand-offs, black-outs, or route re-computations are frequent, TCP will constantly be in slow-start, lowering performance

22 Recap TCP over wireless networks
Several factors contribute to the performance degradation of TCP when used in a wireless environment Approaches to improve TCP performance …

23 Approaches Reliable link layers TCP-aware link layers
Split connection protocols

24 Reliable Link Layers Help in recovering from losses that occur on the wireless link Can potentially hide such losses from the TCP layer Can be implemented without requiring any changes at all to the sender and the receiver

25 Reliable Link Layer (contd.)
Losses can still occur Retransmission can interfere with TCP retransmissions worsening the performance TCP timeouts similar LL timeouts DUPACKs Can introduce variations in TCP’s rtt estimation increasing the RTO

26 Snoop Module Resides in the base-station
Caches packets sent from fixed host to mobile host TCP-aware functionality for retransmissions, and ACK suppression Improves on the performance of reliable link layers

27 Snoop (Contd.) Two modules:
Snoop_data() – for processing data packets on the forward path (from FH – MH) Snoop_ACK() – for processing ACK packets on the reverse path (from MH – FH)

28 Snoop_data() 3 scenarios Normal packet in sequence Cache packet
Forward to MH Timestamp if necessary (once per window) – for RTOs

29 Snoop_data() Scenario 2 Out of sequence (S) but already cached
If highestACK < S Forward packet Else Generate an ACK from the snoop module for the highestACK

30 Snoop_data() Scenario 3
Out of sequence (S) and has not been cached earlier Either out-of-order or packet that was lost earlier Heuristically assume retransmission Packet forwarded, and marked as having been retransmitted due to congestion loss

31 Snoop_ACK() Scenario 1 New ACK Spurious ACK Clean snoop cache
Round-trip estimate updated Spurious ACK ACK# less than highestACK# Discard ACK

32 Snoop_ACK() Duplicate ACK (DUPACK)
If sender retransmitted packet or packet not in cache, forward ACK to sender Unexpected DUPACK (loss between BS and MH) Retransmit packet Keep track of maximum number of relevant DUPACKs possible Expected DUPACKs Suppress

33 Mobile host to Fixed host
Cannot use only base-station based mechanisms Need to change the mobile host NACKs from the base-station to the mobile-station Mobile-station retransmits immediately and does not perform window reduction for NACKed losses

34 Split Connection Approaches
Fixed Host Base Station Mobile Host TCP Wireless aware TP

35 Advantages Wireless aware congestion control and flow control
Wireless link characteristics completely decoupled from the progress of TCP on the wired leg Better service to mobile applications possible Potentially simpler protocol stack at mobile Improved performance

36 Cons Application layer re-linking End-to-end semantics
Software overheads Hand-off latency

37 Recap Wireless networks and TCP Reliable link layers Snoop module
Indirect TCP (split connection) WTCP …


Download ppt "Projects & Wireless Transport"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google