1. PAB-MDM Meeting – Bihar
Mid Day Meal Scheme
PAB-MDM Meeting – Bihar

2. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Review of Implementation of MDMS in Bihar (Primary + Upper Primary) ( to )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

3. Coverage : Institutions : Approval Vs Achievement (Pry)
No. of Institutions
100%
100%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

4. Coverage Institutions Approval Vs Achievement (U. Pry)
No. of Institutions
100%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

5. Coverage : Children Enrolment Vs Achievement ( Pry)
No. of Children (in Cr.)
61%
55%
44%
56755 NCLP Children were covered against the pab approval of 83788
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

6. Beneficiary Vs. Enrolment (Primary)
Districts
Enrolment
Average
Children availed MDM
Diff in percentage children not covered
Anaemia among children
Under Weight Children(-3 SD)
Patna
631725
237340
62%
0.6
18.4
Buxar
282029
108938
61%
3.1
21.6
Bhojpur
367751
183624
50%
1.3
18.5
Gaya
528193
244492
54%
0.0
25.1
Nalanda
334899
170362
49%
2.2
24.2
Rohtas
397290
211320
47%
2.3
20.3
Kaimoor
247850
178718
28%
1.6
26.3

7. Coverage : Children Enrolment Vs Achievement Upper Pry .
No. of Children (in lakh)
59%
48%
39%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

8. Beneficiary Vs. Enrolment ( Upper Primary)
Districts
Enrolment
Average Children
Diff in percentage
Anaemia among Children
Underweight (-3 SD)
Saran
200735
40284
80%
3.2
15.3
Patna
273660
81859
70%
0.6
18.4
Siwan
228051
68386
0.0
21.7
Nalanda
397290
112628
72%
2.2
24.2
Muzaffarpur
202978
74159
63%
27.5
22.4
Bhojpur
117662
43620
1.3
18.5
Kaimoor
194830
81388
58%
1.6
26.3
Buxar
116789
58044
50%
3.1
21.6
Nawada
95274
44580
53%
0.2
20.5

9. Drought affected children : PAB APPROVAL Vs COVERAGE

10. Coverage : Working Days Approval Vs Achievement (Pry)
No. of Working Days
68%
58%
67%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

11. Coverage : Working Days Approval Vs Achievement ( Upper Pry)
No. of Working Days
69%
66%
55%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

12. Approval Vs Achievement Number of Meals (Pry + UPy.)
No. of Meals (in crore)
60%
43%
58%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

13. FOOD GRAIN : ALLOCATION vs. UTILISATION
Quantity in MTs
46%
43%
43% .
87.6 % of Children age months
are anemic (Source - NFHS -3)

14. Food Grain Availability – District wise
Bihar
Rajasthan
Districts with less availability of food grains
Purnia 24%, Vaishali 24%, Katihar 42% Begusarai 43%, Bhojpur 45%

15. Food Grain Utilization – District wise
State Level utilization 43%

16. Severe Anemia among children Severe Anemia among adolescent girls
Districts
FG Utilization
During first 3 quarters
Severe Anemia among children
Severe Anemia among adolescent girls
-3SD (Underweight)
Children
Kishanganj
17%
0.0%
21.6%
22.3%
Sheohar
19%
0.2%
8.1%
18.2%
Khagaria
20%
0.3%
19.4%
26.7%
Madhepura
22%
17.7%
40.7%
Supaul
24%
1.8%
38.3%
28.6%
Jehanabad
27%
0.5%
40.6%
29.9%
Source DLHS 2006

17. Payment of cost of Food grains to FCI
47% of the Bills raised have been paid
Rs is out standing as on

18. COOKING COST : ALLOCATION vs UTILISATION
Rs in Lakh
46%
42%
47%

19. Engagement of Cooks-cum-Helpers during 1.4.11 to 31.12.11
Primary + Upper Primary
No. of CCH
100%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

20. Honorarium to Cooks-cum-Helpers
Rs. In Lakh
90%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

21. MME : ALLOCATION vs UTILISATION
Rs in Lakhs
75%
87%
30%

22. Transportation Assistance ALLOCATION vs UTILISATION
Rs in Lakhs
25%
50%
62%
79%

23. FG Utilization Vs CC Vs TA Vs Lifting (1.4.11 to 31.12.11)

24. Achievement up to 2011-12 (Kitchen cum Stores)
Total Sanctioned : Kitchen Cum Stores
Progress (in %)
16908
GOB has returned an amount of Rs lakh in respect of kitchen shed

25. Achievement up to 2011-12 (Kitchen Devices)
Total Sanctioned :86428 units of Kitchen Devices
Progress (in %)
GOB has returned lakh to GOI, in respect of Kitchen devices.

26. Coverage : Inspections
No. of Institutions
24%

27. Coverage : School Health ProgrammE Against Enrolment (children in cr.)5% 7% 3%
73942 Children were provided Spectacles

28. ISSUES
Less number of children covered against Enrolment in Patna (38%), Nalanda (51%), Saran (20%), Bhojpur (37%), & Buxar (50%).
Less number of days covered (129 against 187) whereas HP covered (192 against 190) .
Less utilization of food grains (43%).
No SSMC Meeting held.
Less availability of FG (57%):- Purnia (24%), Vaishali (24%), Bhojpur(45%).
Less Utilization of FG(43%) :- Kishanganj (17%), Khagaria(20%) & Madhepura (22%).
Less coverage of children under SHP

29. Unavailability of rice and cooking cost in the visited schools.
MI ISSSUES : A.N. Sinha Institute of Social Studies (Districts covered : Jamui, Lakhisarai, Munger and Shekhpura)
Unavailability of rice and cooking cost in the visited schools.
Average quality of food grains are being provided.
Buffer stock was not maintained in maximum schools.
VSS is not formed in any school.
Health Check- up was not done in any visited schools
Food is cooked and kept in open and dirty ground.
Poor quality of food items is often served. .

30. MI ISSSUES : Jamia Millia Islamia (Districts covered : EAST CHAMPARAN, GOPALGANJ, MADHEPURA, SUPAUL, WEST CHAMPARAN
EAST CHAMPARAN : 1. 63% Visited schools were not getting regular food supply 2. 95% visited schools have not maintained health cards GOPALGANJ : (55%) visited did not received food - grains regularly. MADHEPURA : 1. Interruption in the midday meal in 11 (27.5%) of the schools due to the non supply of food grains. 2. Inspection is never done by any state authority SUPUAL: 1. Variation of 30% is found in enrolment and attendance was found in visited schools (95%) schools have not maintained health card WEST CHAMPARAN: (90.4%) schools have not maintained health card.

31. SCORE CARD- ALL COMPONENTS
As per DISE availability of functional girls toilet %

32. Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2012-13
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

33. Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2011-12 and proposal for 2012-13 (Primary) Children in Cr.
(Proposed)
Q-1
Q-2
Q-3

34. Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2011-12 and proposal for 2012-13 ( Upper Primary) children in Lakh
Q-1
Q-2
Q-3
(Proposed)

35. Proposal for Cook-cum-helper engaged in MDM Scheme
Already Engaged
Additional requirement ( )
Cook-cum-helper
183583
In CCH Approved , State Engaged all CCH.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

36. Proposal for Construction of Kitchen-cum-Store
No. of institutions
Sanctioned
Constructed through convergence
Gap
Proposal
65977
Nil
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

37. Proposal for Construction of Kitchen - Devices
No. of institutions
Sanctioned
Procured through convergence
Gap
Proposal
68991
86428
Nil
As number of Institutions have decreased in , institutions are eligible for Kitchen devices.
GOI has already sanctioned units of Kitchen devices as per the earlier number of institutions reported by GOB.
GOB has returned lakh to GOI
16780 KD replacement of the old utensils of 37

38. Component PAB Approval 2011-12 Proposal 2012-13 Recommendation 6798447
Children (Pry)
Children (U Pry)
NCLP
83788
56755
Drought affected (Primary)
Drought affected (Upper Primary)
Working Day
254
251
312
310
D. Affected 21 18
Kitchen cum Store
3790
Nil
Cook cum Helper
183583
No additional
Kitchen Devices
16780 replacement of
MME Plan
Proposed
Rs.22. Cr
Not approved

39. The MDM Logo should be Widely Publicized.
It may be Painted at prominent Places on the outside wall of the school.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

40. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Dinning Hall in Tripura
Thank you
Thank You
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India