Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Session 3 – Presentation of alpha version, tools and benefits

Published byTerence Hopkins Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Session 3 – Presentation of alpha version, tools and benefits"— Presentation transcript:

1 Session 3 – Presentation of alpha version, tools and benefits

2 TUV + external speakers
Agenda Presentation of alpha version, tools and benefits TUV + external speakers 11:00 – 12:30 Presentation of alpha version of platform Contractor TÜV Rheinland Ms. Zijverden / Mr. Hafner Benefits expected from data suppliers Presentation by national authority Presentation by crowdsourcing operator Mr. Ostanek, UKE, NRA Poland Mr. Anderson, M-Lab Survey on expectations and needs and discussion of feedback All

3 Information boxes for each technical term
QoS-1 Theoretical What: Predicted network performance of existing infrastructure How: Assessment / calculation by providers. Example: National data and data collected within scope of EC project (SMART 2013/0054) Select Quality of service (QoS) type or other layer QoS 1: Theoretical QoS 2: Practice optimal QoS 3: Practice experienced Select Theme Availability Wired Infrastructure Availability NGA Infrastructure

4 IHS data - Broadband Coverage in Europe (SMART 2013/0054)
Measuring household coverage of nine broadband access technologies three coverage combinations three speed categories Study question: “What is the number of homes passed by your networks providing this technology in your country?” Overall fixed broadband coverage Combination of DSL (including VDSL), cable, modem (including DOCSIS 3.0), FTTP, and WiMAX Next Generation Access (NGA) coverage Combination of VDSL, DOCSIS 3.0, and FTTP

5 Legend displayed in each query output
Select Quality of service (QoS) type or other layer QoS 1: Theoretical QoS 2: Practice optimal QoS 3: Practice experienced Select Theme Availability Wired Infrastructure Availability NGA Infrastructure Legend is displayed in data mapping screen Legend: QoS 1 (theoretical) availability wired infrastructure in % of households > 95 % > 10 – 50 % > 75 – 95 % 0 – 10 % > 50 – 75 %

6 What is NUTS 3 level? Unterallgäu NUTS 3 DE27C Schwaben NUTS 2 DE27
The current NUTS 2013 classification is valid from 1 January 2015 and lists 98 regions at NUTS 1, 276 regions at NUTS 2 and 1342 regions at NUTS 3 level Unterallgäu NUTS 3 DE27C Schwaben NUTS 2 DE27 Bayern NUTS 1 DE2 Germany NUTS 0 DE

7 Dynamic legend to reflect various value scales
Values displayed in map have different units, hence legend needs to adapt to the current layer Use of same colour categories enable easy interpretation as same colours stand for superior and inferior values Use of legend specific definitions in meta data enable dynamic switch of legend Layer combination Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Best value Limit 1 Limit 2 Limit 3 Limit 4 QoS 1 (theoretical) availability wired infrastructure in percentage of households > 95 % HH > 75 – 95 % HH > 50 – 75 % HH > % HH 0 – 10 % HH Highest 0,95 0,75 0,5 0,1 QoS 3 (practice experienced) average speed download in Mbit/s ≥ 50 Mbit/s ≥ Mbit/s ≥ Mbit/s ≥ Mbit/s < 2 Mbit/s 50 30 16 2 QoS 3 (practice experienced) average latency in ms < 5 ms ≥ 5 – 10 ms ≥ 10 – 20 ms ≥ 20 – 50 ms ≥ 50 ms Lowest 5 10 20

8 Comparison of QoS type / layers
Analysis tool - Comparison of data categories and quality criteria Analysis options Comparison of QoS type / layers NUTS 3 region xxx Technology: Wired Quality criteria: Speed down QoS 1: Theoretical QoS 3: Practice experienced Mbit/s 100 10 50 Supplier y Supplier z Supplier a Comparison of QoS type / layers QoS 1: Theoretical QoS 2: Practice optimal QoS 3: Practice experienced Supplier x Supplier y Supplier z Technology Wired Quality criteria Speed down

9 Analysis tool - Comparison of data categories and quality criteria
Analysis options Comparison of QoS type / layers NUTS 3 region xxx Technology: Wired QoS 3: Practice experienced Mbit/s 100 10 50 Supplier y Supplier z Supplier x Latency 20 ms Speed up Comparison of QoS type / layers QoS 1: Theoretical QoS 2: Practice optimal QoS 3: Practice experienced Supplier x Supplier y Supplier z Technology Wired Quality criteria Speed down Speed up Latency

10 Comparison with other NUTS 3 regions / country
Analysis tool - Comparison of geographic reference points Analysis options Comparison with other NUTS 3 regions / country QoS 1: Theoretical Quality criteria: Speed down Mbit/s 100 10 50 Supplier y 80 110 France Paris Rhône Comparison with other NUTS 3 regions / country Country France NUTS3 Region 1 Paris NUTS3 Region 2 Rhône QoS 1: Theoretical QoS 2: Practice optimal QoS 3: Practice experienced Technology Wired Quality criteria Speed down

11 Comparison of status at different points of time
Analysis tool - Comparison of points of time Analysis options Comparison of status at different points of time NUTS 3 region xxx QoS 1: Theoretical Technology: Mobile Quality criteria: Latency April 2016 April 2015 NetBravo NetRadar 50 10 20 ms Comparison of status at different points of time Most recent available status 6 months ago 1 years ago 2 years ago QoS 1: Theoretical QoS 2: Practice optimal QoS 3: Practice experienced Supplier x Supplier y Supplier z Technology Mobile Quality criteria Latency

12 QoS development diagram
Analysis tool - QoS development Analysis options QoS development diagram NUTS 3 region xxx QoS 1: Theoretical Technology: NGA Quality criteria: Speed down Mbit/s 100 10 50 Jan 2016 June Dec QoS development diagram Starting point End point QoS 1: Theoretical QoS 2: Practice optimal QoS 3: Practice experienced Technology Quality criteria Speed down

13 Analysis tool - QoS development
Analysis options QoS development diagram NUTS 3 region xxx QoS 1: Theoretical Technology: Mobile Quality criteria: Latency Jan 2016 June Dec 50 10 20 ms QoS development diagram Starting point End point QoS 1: Theoretical QoS 2: Practice optimal QoS 3: Practice experienced Supplier x Supplier y Supplier z Technology Mobile Quality criteria Latency Supplier y Supplier z

14 Comparison of QoS type / layers
Analysis tool - Comparison of data categories Analysis options Overall fixed Mobile Comparison of QoS type / layers NUTS 3 region xxx QoS 1: Theoretical Mbit/s 100 10 50 Comparison of QoS type / layers QoS 1: Theoretical QoS 2: Practice optimal QoS 3: Practice experienced Technology Overall fixed NGA Mobile

15 Comparison with other NUTS 3 regions / country
Analysis tool - Comparison of geographic reference points Analysis options Comparison with other NUTS 3 regions / country QoS 3: Practice experienced Technology: Mobile Quality criteria: Latency Supplier y MisuraInternet Italy Perugia Catania 50 10 20 ms NetRadar Comparison with other NUTS 3 regions / country Country Italy NUTS3 Region 1 Perugia NUTS3 Region 2 Catania QoS 1: Theoretical QoS 2: Practice optimal NetRadar NetRadar QoS 3: Practice experienced Supplier x Supplier y Supplier z Technology Mobile Quality criteria Latency

16 Comparison of status at different points of time
Analysis tool - Comparison of points of time Analysis options Comparison of status at different points of time NUTS 3 region xxx QoS 1: Theoretical Technology: Wired Quality criteria: Speed down Mbit/s 100 10 50 April 2016 April 2015 Comparison of status at different points of time Most recent available status 6 months ago 1 years ago 2 years ago QoS 1: Theoretical QoS 2: Practice optimal QoS 3: Practice experienced Technology Quality criteria Speed down

Download ppt "Session 3 – Presentation of alpha version, tools and benefits"

Similar presentations

Northern Ireland’s Superfast Platform

Northern Ireland’s Superfast Platform
Fixed broadband lines penetration (lines as a % of population) reached 28.2% Fixed broadband take- up Growth has slowed down Source: Communications Committee.

Fixed broadband lines penetration (lines as a % of population) reached 28.2% Fixed broadband take- up Growth has slowed down Source: Communications Committee.
1 Office of Electronic Communications Inventory of Telecommunications Infrastructure in Poland Article 29 of Broadband Act.

1 Office of Electronic Communications Inventory of Telecommunications Infrastructure in Poland Article 29 of Broadband Act.
MOBILE/WIRELESS BROADBAND QUALITY OF SERVICE EVALUATION, SPRK EXPERIENCE Aleksandrs Čerņakovs-Neimarks Deputy Director of Electronic Communications and.

MOBILE/WIRELESS BROADBAND QUALITY OF SERVICE EVALUATION, SPRK EXPERIENCE Aleksandrs Čerņakovs-Neimarks Deputy Director of Electronic Communications and.
The Technical and Market Study for WiMAX Name: GAO FENG Department: Wireless Communication and Networking.

The Technical and Market Study for WiMAX Name: GAO FENG Department: Wireless Communication and Networking.
© 2006 | Professor Yale Braunstein | School of Information | U.C. Berkeley s l i d e 1 © 2006 | Professor Yale Braunstein | School of Information | U.C.

© 2006 | Professor Yale Braunstein | School of Information | U.C. Berkeley s l i d e 1 © 2006 | Professor Yale Braunstein | School of Information | U.C.
Next Generation Access: A Global / Policy Perspective Maury D. Shenk 27 June 2007.

Next Generation Access: A Global / Policy Perspective Maury D. Shenk 27 June 2007.
Measuring the experience consumers have when using broadband services Tim Gilfedder Technical Advisor 3 rd July 2015.

Measuring the experience consumers have when using broadband services Tim Gilfedder Technical Advisor 3 rd July 2015.
1 Connecting All Americans Link Hoewing VP, Internet and Technology Policy July 15, 2007.

1 Connecting All Americans Link Hoewing VP, Internet and Technology Policy July 15, 2007.
Pro-competitive EU Framework delivered a success story: affordability, higher speeds, more investment 2.

Pro-competitive EU Framework delivered a success story: affordability, higher speeds, more investment 2.
CMR Scotland 2011. The market in context Figure 1.1, Fast facts 3 Source: Ofcom research, Quarter 1 2011 Base: All adults aged 16+ (n = 3474 UK, 1983.

CMR Scotland The market in context Figure 1.1, Fast facts 3 Source: Ofcom research, Quarter Base: All adults aged 16+ (n = 3474 UK, 1983.
Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2013: Lithuania. Standard fixed broadband* availability Basic broadband for all by 2013 adding wireless, EU coverage is 99.97%

Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2013: Lithuania. Standard fixed broadband* availability Basic broadband for all by 2013 adding wireless, EU coverage is 99.97%
Views expressed are those of the author and may not reflect opinion of ITU, its members or the government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

Views expressed are those of the author and may not reflect opinion of ITU, its members or the government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
October 2013. Penetración de principales servicios finales | Penetration rates for final services (lines/100 inhabitants) 2.

October Penetración de principales servicios finales | Penetration rates for final services (lines/100 inhabitants) 2.
LATVIAN EXPERIENCE IN QOS MEASUREMENTS ON INTERNET, INCLUDING ON MOBILE INTERNET Elmars Lipenbergs Senior expert of Quality of Service Division, Electronic.

LATVIAN EXPERIENCE IN QOS MEASUREMENTS ON INTERNET, INCLUDING ON MOBILE INTERNET Elmars Lipenbergs Senior expert of Quality of Service Division, Electronic.
1 European sector regulation and investment incentives for NGA to meet objectives for Digital Agenda Harald Gruber Project Directorate, European Investment.

1 European sector regulation and investment incentives for NGA to meet objectives for Digital Agenda Harald Gruber Project Directorate, European Investment.
Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2014: Czech Republic. Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2014 2 Basic Broadband for all by 2013 Considering all technologies, Broadband.

Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2014: Czech Republic. Digital Agenda Scoreboard Basic Broadband for all by 2013 Considering all technologies, Broadband.
Methodology of the European Commission’s project “Mapping study (phase II): Mapping of Broadband Services in Europe - SMART 2014/0016” Christiane Lehmann,

Methodology of the European Commission’s project “Mapping study (phase II): Mapping of Broadband Services in Europe - SMART 2014/0016” Christiane Lehmann,
Atlantic Coast Operations Business Intelligence Mobility Project.

Atlantic Coast Operations Business Intelligence Mobility Project.
International Telecommunication Union 1 The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the ITU.

International Telecommunication Union 1 The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the ITU.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google