Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A.Smirnov, A.Sidorin, D.Krestnikov

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A.Smirnov, A.Sidorin, D.Krestnikov"— Presentation transcript:

1 A.Smirnov, A.Sidorin, D.Krestnikov
Effective Luminosity Simulation for PANDA Experiment at FAIR A.Smirnov, A.Sidorin, D.Krestnikov (JINR, Dubna, Russia)

2 Luminosity of PANDA experiment (high-luminosity mode)
Pbar production / loss rate, s-1 1·107 Cross-section of p - pbar, barn 0,05 Maximum luminosity, cm-2 s-1 2·1032 Hydrogen density, Atom/cm3 4,26·1022 Pellet size (diameter), mm 0,028 Pellet flux radius, mm 1,25 Distance between pellets, mm 5 Effective target density, cm-2 4·1015 Revolution period, sec 2·10-6 Antiproton number 1·1011 Mean luminosity, cm-2 s-1

3 Maximum achievable luminosity
=107/5·10-26 = 2·1032 cm-2 s limit for mean luminosity From the other hand limitation for antiproton number life > 104 s N ~ 1011  ~ 4·1015 cm-2

4 Pellet target  = <>thickness Frozen hydrogen density, 
Atoms/cm3 4.261022 The pellet radius, rp m 15 The pellet flux radius, rf mm 1.5 Mean distance between pellets, <h> 5 Mean target density <> 1.71016 Mean distance between pellets Flux radius Pellet diameter  = <>thickness

5 Areal density for Gaussian beam
(pellet is in the beam centre) Peak/mean Effective density  in cm  = 1 mm,  = 4·1015 cm-2, Peak/mean = 2.5

6 Physical models of Internal target
Longitudinal degree of freedom Gaussian model Real (Urban) model ; ; n1, n2 – number of excitation events to different atomic energy levels n – number of ionization events x – uniform random number Eloss – mean energy loss, x – Gaussian random Estr – energy fluctuations (straggling) N N DP/P0 DP/P0 DP/P0+Estr DP/P DP/P Eloss Eloss

7 Transverse degree of freedom
Gaussian model Real (plural) model q – rms scattering angle x – Gaussian random numbers c – screening angle N – number of scattering events x – uniform random numbers target target qstr

8 Average luminosity calculation with BETACOOL code
x s Pellet flux for each model particle Number of events: 1) Integration over betatron oscillation 2) Integration over flux width 3) Number of turns per integration step Number of events for model particle Particle probability distribution Realistic models of interaction with pellet Urban + plural scattering

9 Parameters of COSY experiment
experiment Deuterium beam Momentum, GeV/c 1.2 Energy, MeV/u 177 Particle number 2×1010 Horizontal emittance,  mm mrad 1 Vertical emittance 0.5 Initial momentum spread 2×10-4 Deuterium target Pellet radius, mm 15 Pellet flux radius, mm 2.5 Mean distance between pellets, mm 10 Deuterium density, atom/cm-3 6×1022 COSY Circumference, m Momentum slip factor,  0.533 Horizontal acceptance,  m rad 2.2E-5 Vertical acceptance,  m rad 1E-5 Acceptance on momentum deviation ±1.2×10-3 For benchmarking BETACOOL code data from COSY experiment (June 08 run) was used COSY Parameters of COSY experiment

10 Experiments without barrier bucket
h = 8 mm d = 0.03 mm The beam momentum spread can be calculated from measured frequency spread

11 Signals from detectors
Green and yellow lines are signals from pellet counter Black line is number of particles Other colour lines are signals from different detectors Simulation of particle number on time Simulation of long scale luminosity on time

12 Designed parameters for PANDA (high-luminosity mode)
Momentum, GeV/c 9 RMS momentum spread 1·10-4 Transverse emittance (RMS normalized) 0,4 Average luminosity, cm-2 s-1 2·1032 Detector limit, cm-2 s-1 3·1032 Effective target density, cm-2 4·1015 Pellet velocity, m/s 60 Pellet flux radius, mm 1,25 Pellet size (diameter), µm 28 Distance between pellets, mm 5

13 Effective luminosity calculation
Pellet distribution Pellet distribution Ion beam profile

14 Short scale luminosity variations
Experiment h = 8 mm d = 0.03 mm Simulation h = 0.2 mm d = 0.01 mm

15 Two variants of detector limit
Top cut y Average luminosity Average luminosity Full cut y Effective luminosity x

16 Effective to average luminosity ratio for different detector limit (high-luminosity mode)
Top cut Full cut

17 Effective to average luminosity ratio for different detector limit (high-resolution mode)
Top cut Full cut

18 Conclusions In the case of high-resolution mode if the detector limit is much higher than average luminosity and effective luminosity equals average one. In the case of high-luminosity mode the effective luminosity is very sensitive to the pellet size. For designed pellet size of 28 µm and detector limit 50% over average luminosity of 2·1032 cm-2 s-1 - with top cut regime the effective luminosity is about 50% of average one - with full cut regime – less than 20%


Download ppt "A.Smirnov, A.Sidorin, D.Krestnikov"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google