2. Delhi MLA Report Card
First comprehensive and objective annual report card of the performance of MLAs’ of a State Assembly.
AAP by winning 67 out of 70 seats has got a mandate like no other.
A unique result which changed Indian politics.
Has AAP lived up to the desire and expectations of the people of Delhi?

3. Key highlights on the working of the MLAs
20 out of 58 MLAs ranked have a criminal record as of 31st December of the 20 MLAs had cases registered against them as per their affidavits before elections 10 MLAs have got cases against them after elections.
3 MLAs [Raghuvinder Shokeen representing Nangloi Jat, Prakash representing Deoli (SC) & Mohd. Ishraque representing Seelampur] have not raised any issues in the assembly in 2015.
16 MLAs have only raised 1 to 5 issues.
33% of the MLAs are hardly participating in Deliberations.
In our matrix for ranking, quality of issues raised has a significant weightage. We find that 72% of the MLAs are underperforming regarding this matter.

4. Key highlights regarding citizen issues
150,885 complaints registered for water supply, there were only 33 issues raised by MLAs.
‘Drainage chokes, blockages & cleaning and overflowing manholes’ – where there were 19,327 citizen complaints, only 5 issues were raised by our city’s MLAs in 2015.
‘Mosquito Nuisance & Fogging’ – where there were 10,102 complaints, there were no issues raised by any MLA.
While there were 1092 complaints on Fire Brigade & related issues, only four issues were raised by MLAs in 2015.

5. Key highlights of comparison between Mumbai and Delhi
In Mumbai 31 MLAs and Delhi 58 were ranked, only 26 meetings were held in Delhi as compared to Mumbai’s 50.
In 2015, Mumbai MLAs raised 4343 issues in the state assembly; while, Delhi’s 58 MLAs raised only 951 issues.
Delhi MLAs have raised on an average 16 issues; while, Mumbai MLAs have raised 140 issues on an average.
Delhi’s ruling party (AAP) MLAs have raised on an average 12 issues; while, Mumbai’s ruling party (BJP & Shiv Sena) MLAs have raised 69 issues on an average.
Average score of Delhi is 58.83% as per first report card for the 6th Assembly in 2016 while Mumbai’s average score is 65.11% in 2016.

6. (*) Score of Praja’s Delhi (2016) and Mumbai (2016) report card have been compared.

7. The Constitution as a Basis for monitoring of Elected Representatives
ERs derive their powers for functioning through the Constitution
They are mandated to Attend Sessions, Raise people’s Issues, Debate, Participate in Discussions and Pass legislations.
The Constitution defines their powers and rules of functioning, hence only the Constitution can provide the parameters for their monitoring.

8. Parameters for Rating MLAs (1/4)
Marks
Present1(Attendance, No. & Quality of Issues Raised, Usage of Area Development Fund) 52
Past 2(Education qualification, PAN Card, Criminal cases) 8
Perception (through an citizen survey of 29,950 people for their perception on their MLA’s accessibility/availability, performance, corruption, and satisfaction with quality of life, services provided by government) 40
Negative for new FIR cases after 2015 election 3
Minus 5
Negative for pending Charge Sheet 3
Total
100
RTI Data Source: 1 Vidhan Bhavan and Delhi Government Website; 2 Election Commission of India’s Website; 3 Delhi Police.

9. Parameters for Rating MLAs (2/4)
Present Parameter (Marks)
Sessions Attended
Based on percentage of attendance. 1) 100% to 91%- 10; 2) 90% to 76% - 8; 3) 75% to 61% -6; 4) 60% to 51% - 4; and 5) below 50% - 0 10
Number of Issues Raised
Against Group Percentage Rank. 16 being the top most percentile and so on to the lowest for 1
Importance of Issues Raised
Weightage is given to issues raised through the questions depending on whether they belong to the Central List, State List, or are in the domain of Municipal Authority. In the aggregate scale (out of 100) the following weightage is given: Centre gets 3; State gets 13; Municipal Corporation Delhi gets 4 and Centre/State/Municipal Corporation Delhi gets 7 27
Total Local Area Development Funds Utilised during April’2015 to March'2016
Calculation for the current financial year is done for the sanctioned fund of Rs. 4 crore.1) 100% (or more) to 91%- 5; 2) 90% to 76% - 4; 3) 75% to 61% -3; 4) 60% to 51% - 2; and 5) below 50% - 0 5
Back

10. Importance of Issues Raised
Step 1: Issues raised are categorised into:
Centre based
State based
Municipal Corporation Delhi based
Centre/State/Municipal Corporation Delhi based
Based on the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India.
Overall weightage is given in the ratio of 3:13:4:7 in the above categories.
Step 2: Further issues are given certain weightages depending on them being prime functions of the State Legislature or of the Municipal bodies or the Centre or jointly under Centre/State/Municipal Corporation Delhi.
Step 3: Further weighted by score for Number of Issue Raised.
Back

11. Parameters for Rating MLAs (3/4)
Past Parameter (Marks)
Education Qualification
A minimum of 10th Pass - 1; if not – 0 1
Income Tax
!) Possessing PAN Card - 1 2) Filling of last years IT returns – 1 2
Criminal Record
If the candidate has zero cases registered against her/him, then 5; else as below: 1) Criminal Cases Registered containing the following charges: Murder, Rape, Molestation, Riot, Extortion - 0 2) Other criminal cases than the above mentioned – 3 5
Back

12. Parameters for Rating MLAs (4/4)
Perception Parameter (Marks)
Perception of Public Services
Score on Public Services 20
Awareness & Accessibility
Score on Awareness amongst people about their representative, their political party and ease of access to the representative 6
Corruption Index
Score on perceived personal corruption of the representative 10
Broad Measures
Score on overall satisfaction and improvement in quality of life 4
!) The weightage for Perception of Public Services was further divided into a hierarchy of 4 levels to meet the desired objective. Level 1 included facilities which are more critical to state government whereas Level 4 included facilities that are more critical to central government.
Level 1 – This level included areas like Power supply, Law & Order situation & Instances of crime. It was given a weightage of 8 points
Level 2 – This level included areas like Availability of food through ration shops & Pollution problems. It was given a weightage of 5 points
Level 3 – This level included areas like Hospitals & other Medical facilities & Appropriate Schools & Colleges. It was given a weightage of 4 points
Level 4 – This level included rest of the areas like Condition of Roads, Traffic Jams & Congestion, Availability of public gardens, Availability of public transport facilities, Water Supply, Water logging problems & Cleanliness & Sanitation facilities. It was given a weightage of 3 points
2) Broad Overall Measures: included opinions on Satisfaction with the MLA and Improvement in Lifestyle.
Back

14. Top 3 MLAs

15. Bottom 3 MLAs

18. Top 5 MLAs in Number of Issues Raised
Zone
Constituency No.
Name of the MLA
Party
No. of Issues Raised
Shahdara North 69
Jagdish Pradhan
BJP 85
Shahdara South 59
Om Prakash Sharma 82
Rohini 13
Vijender Kumar 78
Civil Line 20
Alka Lamba
AAP 44 63
Rajendra Pal Gautam 43

20. (*) Includes 4 MLAs who had FIRs before elections as declared in their affidavit.

23. THANK YOU!!!